Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
2008-10-01, 06:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
Fighter BAB
d12 HD
All good saves
Martial weapon proficiency
Heavy Armor proficiency
Max skills (I think 8+Int is max? I don't recall)
No class features.
Granted, it would probably be rather boring.
But would it be balanced?Currently playing as:
Eodrick, LG Dwarven Urban Ranger
Avatar is Balthazar, a currently retired character, by Shades of Grey
Vaulthfaer, a 4E Campaign Setting
-
2008-10-01, 06:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
It would be unbalanced (powerful) for a few levels early on.
Then it would skew STRAIGHT down.
No reason to take beyond one or two levels, but I can't think of anyone who wouldn't dip it instead of fighter. You lose one feat, get +4 saves and a stronger hit die, not to mention an extra 6 skill points.Last edited by afroakuma; 2008-10-01 at 06:43 PM.
Need a place to hang? Like Discord? Don't mind dealing with a capricious demon lord? Then you're welcome to join our LGBTQ+ friendly, often silly, very geeky server to discuss food, music, video games, tabletop, and much more.
Manual of the Planes 5th Edition: for all the things the official 5E Planescape didn't cover. Check it out.
-
2008-10-01, 06:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
Hey Kara. Funny seeing you around here.
Anyway, afro's got it right. Heavily unbalanced as a dip, the god of all martial classes from level 1-3, and completely pathetic by level 10.
-
2008-10-01, 07:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Near Atlanta,GA USA
- Gender
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
Grape (sic) minds think alike... I was just about to do just about exactly this (except I was going to give it 2+INT for its base skill points (quad at first level of course) )...
I recommend making all skills class skills. (Either that or only the most intituiive to use skills)...
I also recommend this class for newbie's first character due to its simplicity.
No idea on the power level...[Public Service Announcement]P.E.A.C.H stands for Please Examine And Critique Honestly[/Public Service Announcement]
Currently Running: Equestria Begins (A High Tactics campaign)
Extended Signature
My Homebrew is meant to be used, but, if you do, PLEASE tell me how it goes.
-
2008-10-01, 07:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
It would be very boring. I'm curious as to why you're creating a class with such bloated generic features...then a total lack of actual features. Is it merely an exercise in game balance, or is this really going to be somehow utilized?
-
2008-10-01, 07:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
Barbarian with more skill points, better saves and heavy armor, but without the abilities that actually make barbarians worthwhile?
Pass.
Siela Tempo by the talented Kasanip. Tengu by myself.
Spoiler
-
2008-10-01, 07:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
There simply can't be balance later on. It could have 2d10 for Hit Dice each level and still drop off the face of the Oerth/Toril/Krynn/what have you past levels 6-10. A fighter would still mop the floor with it, a ranger would double-team it, a barbarian would power up and SMASH.
Only a paladin would try redeeming this class idea.Need a place to hang? Like Discord? Don't mind dealing with a capricious demon lord? Then you're welcome to join our LGBTQ+ friendly, often silly, very geeky server to discuss food, music, video games, tabletop, and much more.
Manual of the Planes 5th Edition: for all the things the official 5E Planescape didn't cover. Check it out.
-
2008-10-01, 07:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: How balanced would this be as a 3.5 base class?
I think Monk, Ranger or Paladin are much better newbie first characters. Monk's simple but is all WOOSH and ZOOM and Ranger and Paladin start out simple and add in a little bit of spellcasting, a few cool features, etc.
All three have issues (esp. Monk and Pally) but are much more interesting at least.