Results 1 to 24 of 24
Thread: Royal Myth
-
2008-10-03, 12:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Royal Myth
Has it been confirmed that royalty exists as a visible label/stat? or do sides just assume someone is a royal because they have high stats. If people dont walk round tagged as royalty it would explain why Ansom wasnt 100% certain about Jillian. Any thoughts on this?
GENERATION 19: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and add 1 to the generation. This is a social experiment.
''Never argue with idiots, they'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.''
''Common sense is very uncommon.''
''It ain't sin if you crack a few laws now and then, just so long as you don't break any.''
-
2008-10-03, 12:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- The Great State of Texas
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Maybe they are tagged with a royal label. It is just that Jillian was from a defeated kingdom. It could be her label was removed when her kingdom fell.
Sniper Extraordinaire for Clan Giant (now defunked)
Thanks in order Shades of Gray, LordRod,and rtg0922 for the awesome avatars.They really made my day!Spoiler,,
-
2008-10-04, 04:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Re: Royal Myth
Being a barbarian shouldnt negate her royal or heir status though since she's still both those things. Unless theyre hidden from other units until she tells them about it?
GENERATION 19: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and add 1 to the generation. This is a social experiment.
''Never argue with idiots, they'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.''
''Common sense is very uncommon.''
''It ain't sin if you crack a few laws now and then, just so long as you don't break any.''
-
2008-10-04, 04:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Obviously, Jillian's stats don't say "Royal" -- there'd be no way to keep it secret. That might mean that "royal" isn't something that routinely shows up in visible stats, or that a royal who survives the fall of their side's capital is no longer "royal" in game-stat terms, or something else.
-
2008-10-04, 04:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Re: Royal Myth
GENERATION 19: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and add 1 to the generation. This is a social experiment.
''Never argue with idiots, they'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.''
''Common sense is very uncommon.''
''It ain't sin if you crack a few laws now and then, just so long as you don't break any.''
-
2008-10-04, 06:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- In search of cheese
Re: Royal Myth
Royalty in Erf is probably the same as "royalty" in the real world.
Being royal means you're descended from a royal, who was in turn descended from a royal who was in turn descended from a royal.... The only difference is what defines the original royal. In erf's case, it's some dude who claimed he was descended from the titants.
Though, there was also mentioned that royal units gain experience a little faster or something.Belkar's Bad to the Bone.
Dispossible a fetter hein and bemay kine a sinder's tock.
-
2008-10-04, 11:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Roma
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Parson explained the Royals benefits quite clearly, and I think that it's out of option to consider that in the game mechanics. Royals levels faster, to say one. It would be very hard to fake such an occurrence.
If Jillian has never shown to be royal, it's just two option:
- Barbarian can't be royals (makes sense);
- Royalty is not a shown stat (like Natural Thinkmancery)
-
2008-10-04, 11:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
-
2008-10-05, 02:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Singapore
Re: Royal Myth
Ansom might simply not be able to see Jillian's stats. Do we have confirmation that allied unit stats are visible, for one? You might only be able to see stats for units that are actually on your own side.
-
2008-10-05, 06:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Zwolle, the Netherlands
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Please buy my lo-fi mini-album at:
http://www.musicfan.fm/beechcraftbonanza
Chaos Farts on your Face Phase, Warhammer, tales of the Oldskool
-
2008-10-05, 07:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Roma
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Could be just Ansom's trip. For what we know, Titans' mandate could be to fight-dance.
Theory: Royals are better units (faster leveling, more stats) because royalty presume inbreeding (even in a world where reproduction is a matter or ordering a son to the Pop-O-Matic.
And if you played Final Fantasy VII, you should know that inbreeding leads to better units. ChoCOOOOO!
-
2008-10-08, 06:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: Royal Myth
I wonder if Erfworlders see titles the way Parson can.
Remember, one of the big plot elements was that nobody knew Jack's name, yet Parson was able to see it through the 3D glasses.
The same could apply to a lot of other things.
-
2008-10-08, 07:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
Casters and warlords can naturally see a unit's stats. Apparently, they don't see the unit's individual name (at least, not if they don't know it already), or else Stanley would have known Jack's name.
-
2008-10-08, 07:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
-
2008-10-08, 09:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: Royal Myth
Parson was able to see the name once he learned it. Before that he would have seen the stats but not the name.
-
2008-10-08, 09:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Royal Myth
Hmmmmm, I assumed (and I'm probably wrong) that a Royal unit must have a capital city for their side. Hence when Faq was taken Gillian didn't disband (being an heir) but as she had no city to call her capital the game automatically branded her a "barbarian" (which I assume is the term for any active unit without a capital)
-
2008-10-09, 01:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
-
2008-10-11, 04:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
Re: Royal Myth
Back to the topic....
My completely unsupported theory:
Royals are....the original players of the game, and whoever gave their accounts to when they got sick of it.
Stanley represents the new players who actually pay to play: attuning to an arkentool costs real bucks.Last edited by Brewdude; 2008-10-11 at 04:29 AM.
-
2008-10-11, 06:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Vienna, Europe
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
it seems Parson was rather surprised to see Jack's last name in http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0120.html ('Jack...Snipe?'). i dont think Wanda told him before that thinkagram.
maybe those goggles give him more information than the usual warlord ability. remember, he's the perfect warlord now.
-
2008-10-11, 05:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: Royal Myth
He's not surprised. That's how a lot of people make initial contact with another person. They say the first name, pause, and say the last name as a question. I do it that way sometimes.
-
2008-10-12, 09:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Fith layer of Heck.
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
-
2008-10-12, 10:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
-
2008-10-12, 10:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Royal Myth
I would imagine Royals are the units that first popped when the first "game" of Erfworld started. In this way they claim to have some relation to the Titans because they were clearly not ordered to be "popped" by others. Its the whole "king by divine right" thing.
-
2008-10-13, 02:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Roma
- Gender
Re: Royal Myth
I'm losing the purpose of this thread. It was about the fact that Royalty could be a fake myth in Erfworld. Actually I think there are objective reason to consider it as real.
The hypothesis that Royal are just the first players, or the beta tester, would means that this privilege is inherit by units descending from the original player unit. Kinda a game breaker, in my opinion.