Results 1 to 30 of 35
Thread: Dominate Person Question
-
2012-01-19, 07:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Dominate Person Question
Once a person is Dominated, is an attempt to re-Dominate them automatically successful to keep them in a state of perpetual Domination? If allies can willingly fail a save, and a Dominated person is more loyal than an ally, I'd assume so, but there might be some errata that I missed.
Edit: Sorry - this probably goes in the Q&A thread...Last edited by Torq; 2012-01-19 at 07:51 AM.
"Make a smell check."
-
2012-01-19, 09:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Yes, that is completely possible. Behold, you just found one of the many ways a Wizard can be broken. This isn't even one of the bad ones.
-
2012-01-19, 09:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Mountain View, CA
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
In most cases, I would rule that an order to fail a save against a new Dominate Person would be at least against the subject's nature and possibly even obviously self-destructive. Thus, attempting to do this would either not work at all or would give the subject a chance to break free immediately.
Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.
Avatar by Ceika.
Archives:
SpoilerSaberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)
-
2012-01-19, 09:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
Re: Dominate Person Question
If the target doesn't know he is dominated and doesn't know it will be dominate spell (bluff him think it is buff or something.) yeah sure.
But if he has reason to doubt then perhaps it would give some penalty to saving throw
and if he knows he is dominated then normal saving throw.
-
2012-01-19, 09:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Re: Dominate Person Question
So I say to them, "Hey, I have this awesome buff for you so just go with it." They have no reason to distrust me. They love me.
Of course, I wanted to do this to a caster, so they'd likely make the Spellcraft check, thereby calling my bluff. My buff bluff.
EDIT: Ninja'd. Basically what he said ^^^Last edited by Torq; 2012-01-19 at 09:57 AM.
"Make a smell check."
-
2012-01-19, 10:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
-
2012-01-19, 01:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Icy Evil Canadia
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
While limited, Enchantment could be one of the most powerful and useful schools. In fact, the reason there are so many immunities to it is otherwise it's far too powerful.
It's one thing to kill an enemy. It's another thing to collect enemies as slaves and turn them against their former allies.
-
2012-01-19, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
So powerful, in fact, that a first-level spell can render it irrelevant.
Also, you'd better keep them from interacting with... well, anyone who isn't you, because a DC 15 Sense Motive check is peanuts.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-19, 03:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Icy Evil Canadia
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Yeah, I kinda just mentioned the reason for that.
Anyway, "Protection from [Alignment]" doesn't render it irrelevant. The spell has a duration of only minutes, and only temporarily suppresses Dominate, which will last 9 days at the lowest level you can cast it.
Because of those defenses, Enchantment is weaker than it should be, no question. Without them, it would be way too powerful. Either way, when it works, Dominate is about the most powerful spell in the game.Last edited by Talya; 2012-01-19 at 03:34 PM.
-
2012-01-19, 03:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
-
2012-01-19, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Yeah, but getting it constant is easy. In fact, anyone can suppress it indefinitely with a single feat.
I disagree, even when it works there are fundamental drawbacks to the spell. The "against its nature" clause can add a bunch of saving throws if you don't know your victim inside out, good luck killing your slave if it gets captured or otherwise becomes trouble, language barrier is a factor... there are much more powerful spells out there even if we handwave the difficulty of landing it to begin with.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-19, 04:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
-
2012-01-19, 05:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Icy Evil Canadia
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Oh, true. But that's not as easily doable in the same fight, is it? At the very least, you first need to kill them, THEN animate them. (And I don't have the books handy, how long is the casting time on Animate Dread warrior?) Dominate turns them into your servant on this turn, instantly. Instead of instantly killing your target, you instantly gain the target as an ally.
Note, I'm not saying enchantment is overpowered, doing so would be silly, because it's so easy to defend against. I'm saying without excellent enchantment defenses, enchanters would easily rule every campaign setting in a matter of weeks.
I think defenses against enchantment should be less...absolute. Force some kind of roll...CL check or something, then they still get the saving throw. It's okay for a spell which turns your enemy into your ally to have twice the failure rate as a spell which kills your enemy outright. But the absolute defenses available go a bit overboard.Last edited by Talya; 2012-01-19 at 05:16 PM.
-
2012-01-19, 05:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Buenos Aires
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
No, you can't force someone to fail his save against domination. If a wizard sneaks behind someone and cast Dominate that someone still gets his save, even if he didn't saw the spell coming. In the same way, lying to the victim of a Dominate Person won't prevent him from making a save.
Most importantly, the spell never says that the person loves the caster or cares for him. It does say "Subjects resist this control, and any subject forced to take actions against its nature receives a new saving throw with a +2 bonus". The subject is resisting the spell constantly. That's way falling to concentrate on it for more than 24 hours or forcing someone to do something against it's nature causes a new save. You command him like a puppet, but the victim feelings towards the caster don't change.Last edited by Denamort; 2012-01-19 at 05:33 PM.
-
2012-01-19, 05:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Mountain View, CA
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
The person making a save always has the option of forgoing the save and automatically failing. This is rather important for a whole bunch of "harmless" spells that have saves and would otherwise be difficult to use. If you have already dominated someone, "fail your next save" (though it would be phrased in character more like "don't resist this next spell") is a valid order. Whether Dominate Person can force someone to obey it is another issue, but the order itself is valid with a legal game mechanical meaning.
Lying to someone can't directly prevent someone from making a save, but it could convince someone to exercise his option to automatically fail - who would want to resist a healing (or whatever you tell him it is) spell, after all?Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.
Avatar by Ceika.
Archives:
SpoilerSaberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)
-
2012-01-19, 06:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Forests of Sweden
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
A charmed person trusts you. A dominated one does not, and will not take your word for it that you are doing something nice with your filthy black magic.
Throw the dice high.
-
2012-01-19, 06:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-20, 09:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: Dominate Person Question
99.99% of characters wordlessly accept (read: intentionally fail saves against) buff spells, even when they've previously come to blows with the caster, or have never even spoken to the caster before, and have no idea what spell is being cast due to not having ranks in Spellcraft.
If you see someone casting Fox's Cunning on you (or whatever buff; false theurgy makes it look like any spell you want), you're going to accept it. Doing otherwise is metagaming.
-
2012-01-20, 10:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2012-01-20, 10:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
If someone dominated me against my will, I would never voluntarily fail any will save they gave me the chance to make.
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-20, 10:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Forests of Sweden
- Gender
-
2012-01-20, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Well, then, you've gotta butter 'em up. Throughout their time under your domination, give them REAL buffs. They'll never see it coming when you redominate them. Heck, they won't even KNOW you redominated them, since they don't know how long your spell woulod've lasted. Just keep giving them a cycle of buffs and dominations. Treat them like they were a PC. (Wait, not everyone dominates their allies? Oops.)
-
2012-01-20, 11:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Forests of Sweden
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
I wouldn't let them buff me either. They are making me do things against my will. Why should I let them make me do them better?
Throw the dice high.
-
2012-01-20, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
-
2012-01-20, 12:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
"You can control the actions of any humanoid creature through a telepathic link that you establish with the subject’s mind."
Making a will save, however, doesn't require an action.
Furthermore, not resisting spells cast by a known enemy is not within anyone's nature.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-20, 01:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2012-01-20, 01:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Last edited by Psyren; 2012-01-20 at 01:36 PM.
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2012-01-20, 02:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Forests of Sweden
- Gender
-
2012-01-20, 02:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Icy Evil Canadia
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
So, after the mind rape, you ask "Was it good for you?"
-
2012-01-20, 02:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Dominate Person Question
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)