Results 121 to 150 of 620
-
2024-03-19, 12:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2020
-
2024-03-19, 01:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2024-03-19, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
I kind of think Roggvir gets executed less for the actual act of letting Ulfric through the gate, I doubt there's much he could have done to stop him on short notice anyway, and more for publically denying that what Ulfric did is murder.
If Roggvir's reaction upon finding out what happened was to go 'oh no, what have I done?' and throw himself at his commander's mercy I imagine he would have gotten off with whatever menial penal duty the Solitude guard has. Latrine cleaning, potato peeling or scrubbing gull poop off a statue, a month of night watches, that sort of thing.
Instead his reaction was something like 'It was a duel? Well in that case I did nothing wrong, duels are legal according to our customs and so I shouldn't have detained Ulfric even if I could.' I can't imagine that made the authorities who all liked the deceased High King all that happy with him, and in turn led to trumped up charges.Sanity is nice to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.
-
2024-03-19, 02:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2020
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Well, i believe he gets executed mostly to enforce a legal lie. The notion that Torygg was "murdered".
If Torygg was murdered, then Roggvir facilitated his killer's escape. Even unwittingly, he was accessory to murder.
If the duel was legal, then Roggvir did his duty to the letter.
Since the Empire cannot accept the notion that the duel was legal, they have to cut off Roggvir's head.
-
2024-03-19, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Even by the Nords' own laws, Ulfric wasn't king yet just because he killed Torygg. He would still need to be confirmed by a council of other kings at the Moot before he could take his place as High King; which is why he still isn't as we start the game.
He seemed to, as the only defense he offered at his execution was this:
"There was no murder! Ulfric challenged Torygg. He beat the High King in fair combat."..."Such is our way! Such is the ancient custom of Skyrim, and all Nords!"
Ulfric is the one who issued the challenge, so Torygg was just defending himself. Mind you he'd probably be called a dumbass for even accepting an honor duel in the first place.
Which is the most frustratingly hypocritical part of Ulfric's point about Torygg in the first place. With one breath he belittles him for being "too weak" to be king of Skyrim, and with another praises him for having the courage to actually accept the duel and fight like a Nord.
I think it's a real missed opportunity for one of the endings to the Civil War not being that you get to just challenge him to a duel in his throneroom on first meeting him and then call him a weak bitch after he gets ripped apart.
-
2024-03-19, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2020
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
I mean, we can definetly, DEFINETLY call out Ulfric for his selective following of "Nord Traditions".
He refuses to call a Moot because he's afraid the other Jarls would give the crown to Ellisif. Despite the High King being a position that can ***only*** be given by a Moot of the Jarls.
Also, ive recently read that apparently these duels were hardly "to the death". Usually the winner ended up High King and the loser in exile. But Ulfric decided to kill the young king to make a point.
Ultimately, i think a lot repose on Ulfric's bad decision making. I believe he is genuine in his faith and love of his people, but will throw away principles to pursue these goals in a way he sees fit, rather than acknowledge some rules can be more important than his judgement.
I.e. he wants to do what's right but man is he stupid the way he goes about it.
-
2024-03-19, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Yes, that is very much my opinion on him, yet another old-fashioned idiot who thinks that "honorable" is better than intelligent. Which is also why I have a hard time taking the people (whether in or out of universe) who complain about Ulfric winning "unfairly" seriously. If you're in a fight to the death, you'd be an idiot not to use every tool at your disposal.
I don't actually think this is hypocritical. Torygg can be brave enough to accept the challenge, yet also not strong enough to win and/or rule the country.
Now, I don't think being a good fighter has much to do with being a good leader (and if I never again see another plot where someone can become the leader by fighting the current leader, it'll be too soon) but that's clearly in line with Nord culture.
-
2024-03-19, 03:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
The issue is that an honor duel is meant to be ritualized. It's not just "a fight to the death", it's a fight where people agree on terms.
If you and I agree to duel at noon, with sabers, and you pull out your Glock and kill me...yeah I'm dead, but that doesn't mean you "won the duel", it means you broke the terms of said duel and now it's just murder.
Typically this is what seconds would be there to help enforce, but I guess Nord dueling isn't that sophisticated.
-
2024-03-19, 03:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Gender
-
2024-03-19, 03:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Indeed. And if the duel in question had a rule banning what Ulfric did, I could see it being called murder or at least some sort of crime. But unless I've missed something, even the people bashing Ulfric for it never seem to say it's against the rules. He might be dishonorable, he might be the duel equivalent of a dog playing basketball, but I don't think he actually broke any terms.
-
2024-03-19, 04:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2020
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
And sometimes, a duel is "both fighter go at it to the best of their capabilities".
The use of Tu'um was unorthodox not because it broke some ancient tradition of "no magic", but because it was rarely used since so few people nowaday knows how to master the Tu'um. What was once a proud tradition and god-given power of the Nord people has dwindled down to the point where you can count the Nords able to master it on the finger of your hand.
The Tu'um has been part of Nord culture ever since Kyne and Paarthunax taught them how to use it.
-
2024-03-19, 04:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
This is why that, rather than it being morally correct, even according to Nords, I see this as being potentially "Un-Nord" in spirit. The Chinese invented gun powder. When they dueled each other I don't think that one duelist shooting at the other with a machine gun makes sense, even though it originates in Chinese culture, unless the other side also has a fire arm.
-
2024-03-19, 04:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
If you live in a culture where duels of honour are fought and you decline a challenge you also concede whatever the challenge is about. If Torygg had declined the duel he would have revealed himself to be weak and unfit to rule.
Evidently Nords don't allow for a champion in such duels.
We don't know what the code duello is for the Nords and what is or is not allowed. (Though we do know the one for the Altmer in the 2nd era.)
-
2024-03-19, 04:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Well, that would explain why Tullius starts by saying 'No man would kill his King with The Voice...' However, my bet is there being rules for dueling, but not that many. More the sorts to stop you having to fend off a duel while sitting on the latrine armed only with a glorified dinner knife. However, it may be that the 'loophole abuse' was more Ulfric noticing that it was still technically legal but hadn't been done in centuries.
Except traditional Nord culture does have some no-nos. Magic, for example is held to be something those snotty Bretons and 'weak' elves favour and they're not likely to look well on shooting down your opponent with a poisoned bow either. Which suggests 'the Thu'um as loophole abuse' as it's both 'traditional' but also something few can stand against successfully [which also makes you wonder if it is 'another loophole' to fight a duel in wolf-man form].My online 'cabinet of curios'; a collection of seemingly random thoughts, experiences, stories and investigations: https://talesfromtheminority.wordpress.com/
'This is my truth, tell me yours.' - Nye Bevan
-
2024-03-19, 04:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Right, which is where my comment about hypocrisy comes in. Ulfric's entire issue with Torygg is that he's "not Nord enough".
But if he was truly that corrupted by Imperial ideals he would have declined the duel and relied on the political backing of the Empire to ensure he stays in his seat. By accepting the duel at all, he essentially proves Ulfric wrong.
Torygg is still a Nord, with a Nord's pride and respect for Nord culture. Which leaves any other disagreements he and Ulfric have as purely political.
That takes a lot of wind out of the sails of Ulfric's movement in terms of being purely in the right from a "Nord perspective". And so he chooses to paint Torygg as a weak coward instead of what he actually was: a brave man with different political views and less personal combat prowess than Ulfric.
This is I think another thing that puts Ulfric on the wrong foot. The Thu'um is absolutely part of Nord culture, and is part of their cultural power.
But that cultural power also comes with cultural responsibility. Not just to the Way of the Voice, which teaches that the Thu'um must not be used for personal or political gain, but to the even deeper aspect of the culture that the Thu'um is meant to be used solely as a weapon against evils which cannot be fought by traditional means.
Using the Voice to slay Torygg is similar in concept to someone unsheathing the Holy Sword of Demon Slaying to murder a political rival. That is not a power meant to be used against those with mere mortal disagreements with each other, but should be reserved for fighting threats beyond the ken of most mortal men.
And I find it notable that Ulfric doesn't hesitate to unleash the Voice against a man powerless to stand against it, but raises not a finger to use it against the return of the ancient foe it was designed to defeat.
That is my personal theory for why there's "no law against shouting your opponent to death!": because the ancient Nords who laid down these laws, after the atrocities the earliest Nords committed with them, would have been appalled at the very idea of using the Thu'um for something so petty.Last edited by Rynjin; 2024-03-19 at 04:42 PM.
-
2024-03-19, 04:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Yes, maybe magic would be against the rules or maybe it would just be met with disapproval. We don't know their exact rules, but considering the fact that even Ulfric's enemies doesn't seem to suggest that he actually broke the rules, it seems unlikely that he did.
So if he had declined the duel, that would've proven Ulfric correct? I don't think it's an either or situation. Clearly it's possible to be devoted to both the Empire and Nord culture, just look at Rikke. Exactly where Ulfric draws the line of "not Nord enough" is obviously subjective, but I don't think it's hypocritical.
-
2024-03-19, 04:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
That only goes so far. It's not what Torygg thinks or believes, it's what everyone else thinks of him. The Empire isn't strong enough to keep him as the High King if the people and Jarls of Skyrim think otherwise. The Empire can barely keep its own territory intact, let alone impose its will on other provinces.
Originally Posted by Mr Blobby
I suspect that use of the Voice is completely acceptable in Nord duelling because, unlike magic, it's of the body not Aetherius.
-
2024-03-19, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
-
2024-03-19, 04:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Yeah, I kind of assume the war was more or less unavoidable at that point. Maybe it could've been avoided if Ulfric had lost the duel in a manner his followers would consider fair, but even in that case I'm guessing there would at least be some unrest, considering the issues Ulfric championed won't go away just because he does.
Personally, I think Torygg's best move would've been to imprison this clearly rebellious jarl and then move as quickly as possible to neutralize his followers. It would probably still have been war, but the imperial side would've started out in a much better position. The obvious drawback is that such a "dishonorable" move might've costed him some support, but I suspect the situation was already polarized enough by then that it wouldn't have made a ton of difference. (Of course, all of this is wildly speculative).Last edited by Batcathat; 2024-03-19 at 04:57 PM.
-
2024-03-19, 05:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2024-03-19, 05:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2023
-
2024-03-19, 05:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
-
2024-03-19, 05:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
What do you think they mean when they say he murdered Torygg? The main opinion isnt that he broke any rules as such, its that the entire duel was illegitimate in the first place and has no legal standing. Ulfric seems to at least tacitly agree with this position, as he doesn't think the Moot will choose him as High King unless he places his own Jarls in power before hand, and otherwise seeks other symbols to boost his legitimacy.
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2024-03-19, 05:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
The fact that the High King accepted the duel suggest that it was legitimate, I think. So if the duel itself was legitimate (or at least that the High King was as guilty of fighting in an illegitimate duel as Ulfric), then the method must be the problem, but there seems to be no actual rules against the method in question.
-
2024-03-19, 05:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2024-03-19, 05:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
No, I'm saying that if the High King agreed to the duel (which by all accounts he did), then it was a legitimate duel (or close enough to it, considering it had implicit approval of the highest authority around) held according to whatever rules apply and none of those rules seem to forbid using the Voice.
If Ulfric had just stormed into the room and killed Torygg? Yeah, that would've been murder, whether or not he used the Thu'um. But it appears he issued a challenge and Torygg accepted it, which certainly makes it seem a lot less murdery, in my opinion.
-
2024-03-19, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2024-03-19, 06:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Of course he had the ability to say no. He simply had to decide to sacrifice his honor in order to possibly avert war instead of sacrificing his life for basically no reason (well, I suppose he'll get a nice seat in Sovngarde for his trouble). It was certainly a tricky situation, which was no doubt Ulfric's intention, but he had more than one option.
As for terms, the challenge was specifically according to old Nord traditions, which presumably came with certain rules. And if they didn't, well, then using the Thu'um certainly wasn't against them.
Whether or not it was actually legitimate is presumably a question for Skyrim's lawyers, but at the very least the highest legal authority in the land accepted the duel, which certainly gives the impression that it was legitimate.
-
2024-03-19, 06:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
Though, as mentioned upthread, denying the challenge would have likely also led to a war.
Genuinely I think the only "winning" play for Torygg and a unified Skyrim would be for Torygg to accept the challenge and win. As I see it once the gauntlet was thrown there are only a few possibilities.
-Ulfric wins, causing a schism between imperial loyalists and "true Nords".
-Torygg declines the challenge, causing a schism between imperial loyalists and "true Nords".
-Torygg wins, proving his strength and right to rule, thus averting the conflict for a while (though probably only until the next High King)
-Torygg has Ulfric assassinated, causing a schism between imperial loyalists and "true Nords"
Essentially Ulfric put Torygg into a situation where the only moral option is to take up his sword and try to prevent a war.
-
2024-03-19, 06:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Stormcloaks Or Empire (One Of The Three Certainties Of Life)
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”