Results 241 to 270 of 815
-
2019-03-02, 03:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I don't know, I feel like a lot of the Gods callousness can be explained by the whole "watching countless worlds get destroyed" thing. I feel like, after watching endless worlds of their followers die with prayers to them on their lips, its a wonder the Gods aren't just completely numb.
Last edited by woweedd; 2019-03-02 at 03:13 AM.
-
2019-03-02, 03:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Without getting too directly political, I would note that such situations actually do occur. In some countries, this tends to be a result of people being able to move between various elected or appointed positions that exist on different those figurative "checks and balances" scales.
Also, it's not precisely a conflict of interest. If we assume the President doesn't have a personal stake in how the law is enforced, then the outcome of the vote only matters to the extent that it might make his job easier or harder. For example, if I were President, I would probably want the referendum to "lower taxes, increase spending, and balance the budget" to fail horribly, while I'd be much more okay with "Just do what you want and try not to start any more wars." If, on the other hand, the President does have a personal stake, then the conflict of interest will exist regardless of whether he certifies the vote, enforces its outcome, or both. If a President had to enforce a rule collecting taxes from farms, and he owns huge farms, that's already a conflict of interest. If a judge has to certify the vote on whether to tax the farms, and he owns huge farms, that's a conflict of interest. If one person has both duties, and some big farms, that doesn't create a conflict of interest that didn't already exist, though it arguably makes it a bit worse. And if one person has both duties, but owns zero farms (and is otherwise not benefiting or suffering from the outcome), then there's no conflict of interest.
As I previously mentioned, your concern is more of a separation of powers, checks and balances sort of issue. The idea is that you don't want one person, or one position, to have all the power in government. In general, many modern democracies follow a similar pattern to the U.S. in how they separate those powers, creating a legislative branch to make laws, a judiciary to interpret them, and an executive to "enforce them." However, that's not the only way to separate the powers. Many countries, for example, make a distinction between head of state and head of government. I've heard some describe the United States as having the President be the head of state, and the leaders of the two houses of Congress be the head of government--but in practice the apportionment of responsibilities among them is very different than it is in--for example--Commonwealth countries.
I understand why, for somebody accustomed to many real world governments, that one guy both overseeing a vote and enforcing an outcome (in this case, forwarding the vote to the Godsmoot) feels like it violates the separation of powers. However, I don't think it does. For one thing, as far as has been explicitly revealed, Dvalin has precisely one role in government--forward the vote of the Council of Clans to the Godsmoot. Perhaps, more generally, obey the vote of the Council of Clans. This seems like a ministerial role--that is, he obeys the decisions, rather than making them. In practice, it is often people with such roles who find themselves responsible for supervising elections or votes. For example, appointed supervisors and employees might be more inclined to oversee an election honestly if they don't actually have to run in an election to keep their jobs.
If you're worried about conflict of interest, then you're worried that Dvalin might--completely against what we've been shown about his character--decide to substitute his own judgement for that of the Council of Clans. The thing is, this conflict of interest already exists. As far as the laws of deities are concerned, Dvalin has the absolute power to unilaterally cast his vote however he wants--it is only his sense of duty that prompts him to abide by the vote. Giving him the additional power to supervise the council vote contributes absolutely nothing to that potential conflict of interest because--again--he already has the absolute power to unilaterally cast his vote however he wants. He has no obvious reason to put his finger on the scales of the vote because he is already 100% in control of the only outcome that matters.
Edit: A few potential reasons exist, but they don't make sense for this situation. Someone like Lord Shojo might prefer to manipulate the vote, make the Council of Clans believe that he is completely obedient to their will, hiding the fact he had a desired outcome and worked to make it happen. Someone like Thor, arguably, or really, a bunch of characters, might use that power to abide by the letter of the rule while flagrantly violating its spirit. Neither of these actions seem consistent with what we've seen of Dvalin.Last edited by Xyril; 2019-03-02 at 03:41 AM.
-
2019-03-02, 04:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
You are thinking of pplytheistic religion. This looks nothing like pantheism.
I couldn't agree more.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-03-02, 04:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
One explanation for the blue/orange separation could be that it's mechanically impossible to build them adjacent (plus of course that it resembles an airlock-and airlocks are cool). Relatedly it wouldn't be the first time someone thought, but if we made the orange bigger we're giving more protection (I mean you don't want to let dominated people attack your outer guards, do you)
As I see it there are two/three/four/five/six loopholes.
1) They defaultly vote [b]yes to the main proposal. If the order (or interesting characters) learn this and invert the question then this causes the vampires a risk of a straight up fail if they can't re-order.
2) They defaultly vote yes to the main proposal. If the main proposal is something unrelated then this stalls things. "Now the first and most important thing we need to decide, do we expell this lunatic who says he is on a mission from Thor".
3) obey any verbal instructions given by a vampire, this means that they can't give (effective) orders via proxy, or if they can't speak for some reason
4) is there anything legal that Durkon can do (sun roof being the obvious one) 4b) the important law given explicitly focuses on creatures in a council meeting
6) Is there anything the vampires can be tricked into doing that is illegal under dwarf law
-
2019-03-02, 04:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
-
2019-03-02, 04:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
In the chamber, breaking Dwarven law turns you to stone.
In before because the OOTS is there to stop an evil plot, they are exempt under an ancient, obscure clause."You... little... *****. It's what my old man called me, it's like it was my name, and I proved him right, by killing all the wrong people. [And], I love ya Henry, and I'll never call you anything but your name, but you gotta decide; are you gonna lay there, swallow that blood in your mouth, or are you gonna stand up, spit it out, and go spill theirs?" - Unknown
-
2019-03-02, 04:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
That's a good catch, though I imagine that if there isn't some specific rule barring it--and Dvalin's high priest doesn't avoid doing so out of an abundance of caution--he would want to commune with his demi-god as soon as possible to convey that information. In fact, I would think that in general the high priests might want to contact their deities to let them know about some potential deficiencies in the rules protecting the Godsmoot and that they probably need to find a new host for the next one.
-
2019-03-02, 04:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
-
2019-03-02, 04:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
What did I miss????
Durkon will enter the chamber the old fashioned way. He carries destruction with him!
Might be! There are (???) limits on how many people/dwarves they can dominate
Im still thinking of ways for an Allosaurus to be useful here.
Will it be against dwarven law to eat dominated Council members??
Bloodfeast and the exarch have met before!
As he is carried in an extradimensional place - will he be able to pass the hole erm the barrier ???
schLast edited by schmunzel; 2019-03-02 at 04:38 AM.
Do NOT argue with idiots - they drag you on their level and beat you with experience
-
2019-03-02, 04:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Last edited by schmunzel; 2019-03-02 at 05:06 AM.
Do NOT argue with idiots - they drag you on their level and beat you with experience
-
2019-03-02, 05:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
However each dominated dwarf can still be commanded telepathically by the vampire who dominated them.
My guess is that there is a priest of Dvalin charged with relaying the proposal to be voted on inside (probably through Summon Proxy) and that the vampires are afraid that Dominating them would stop the process.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-03-02, 06:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Tokyo
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
The first thing that came to my mind when reading the part about dispel magic was that Durkon's new hammer might have some kind of dispel effect on it.
-
2019-03-02, 06:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I don't expect him to be comparable to Redcloak (or to the Dark One as portrayed by Redcloak), basically. I think a LN (or less likely, as you say, LG) deity could certainly focus on the "common/greater good" and the big picture, but not so much that he'd cross certain lines and trample on the rights of individuals without a care in the world. I don't think a LN (or LG) alignment would be compatible with something like "Oh, the current crop will all die immediately, but the future dwarves will be better off, so it's a net gain", for example.
But from my point of view this doesn't really have much to do with this issue, or with what I would expect a god in the position of Dvalin (and Thor) to do. It's not that I feel Dvalin should know because he'd be super invested in every individual dwarf, it's that I feel he should know because a) Thor knows and it's in his best interest to tell Dvalin, if indeed he couldn't learn about this on his own or through his high priest, and b) knowing and acting on this is a requirement for Dvalin to uphold his "big picture" values of respecting the will of the clans.
I would also like to repeat what I said in the last thread: ultimately, this has a lot to do with my initial gut reaction of feeling that something didn't quite click. It's hard to change that regardless.ungelic is us
-
2019-03-02, 06:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
'Utúlie'n aurë! Aiya Eldalië ar Atanatári, utúlie'n aurë! “The day has come! Behold, people of the Eldar and Fathers of Men, the day has come!" And all those who heard his great voice echo in the hills answered, crying:'Auta i lómë!" The night is passing!"
-
2019-03-02, 07:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Manchester, UK
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I would assume that the anti-magic in effect in the central chamber would also block telepathic commands. Not only because that would make sense, but also because it would explain why the Dominated elders have been instructed to obey any command given them by a vampire--that would be unnecessary if they could still be commanded remotely.
-
2019-03-02, 08:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
-
2019-03-02, 08:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
If that is actually how the rules work the dwarves might have a serious problem handling protesters one day. Seriously if they manage to get into the blue area (and if the vamps can get in there apparently is no general rule against outsiders entering) they can't be attacked but if the rules worked like that could still do property damage. (Though maybe there is some law that allows some council member to order people out.)
-
2019-03-02, 09:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
-
2019-03-02, 09:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Last edited by Aveline; 2019-03-02 at 09:04 AM.
-
2019-03-02, 09:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- A Shallow Grave
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I'm going to try hard here to make this completely non-political, but we had that happening a US State in the 2018 election, where one candidate for Governor was also the current secretary of state in charge of the states elections. That candidate won, and currently sits as governor. As with all things Fantasy reflects reality.
-
2019-03-02, 09:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
-
2019-03-02, 09:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Last edited by Aveline; 2019-03-02 at 09:45 AM. Reason: TIL: "quibble" is different from "tiff"
This signature was written by me, Aveline, to indicate that this message was written by me, Aveline.
-
2019-03-02, 09:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-03-02, 10:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
- Location
- Singapore
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Wow, the very first panel of this strip put to rest my questions from the last strip. Well played.
SpoilerI am a: Chaotic Good Human Bard(14th Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength-10
Dexterity-15
Constitution-12
Intelligence-6
Wisdom-9
Charisma-23
-
2019-03-02, 10:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
The detail that the gods don't pay heed to mortal affairs, even the ones happening at the principal Godsmoot, really does put out the idea that Dvalin will check in on the Council to see if they really did vote in accordance with their will.
If Dvalin were aware of the domination plan - a reasonable inference if one forgets that gods don't hear mortals (and heck, I forgot too) - then yes, it would be odd for Dvalin to call a vote and not be concerned about its legitimacy. Maybe then I'd agree that this subplot is contrived.
But Dvalin is not aware, and it is not contrived that he is not aware: the gods are not actually at Zenith Peak listening; they have to summon proxies that communicate with each other, because if they actually convened in a hall the world would literally end.This signature was written by me, Aveline, to indicate that this message was written by me, Aveline.
-
2019-03-02, 10:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Whereas I think you're making a category error by expecting OotS gods to function on the same moral scale as mortals at all. Rich described their attitude toward mortals as comparable to our attitude toward termites and dust mites.
This does mean that if judged on the same scale as Roy Greenhilt, all the gods of the OotS setting would come out as essentially Neutral Evil, with the difference between Thor and Hel being that Thor is closer to the Neutral border than Hel. And it means that Dvalin, ultimately, cares about the oath he made and doesn't really care about the mortals who might die and be damned as a result of him upholding the letter of that oath in a situation it was never intended for--they're only dust mites. It's not a matter of a big picture value. It's exceedingly narrow, actually: I swore this oath, I follow it, what the mortal me was thinking when he took it doesn't matter.
Not to try to argue with gut reactions, of course.Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-03-02, 10:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I'm seeing all these theories about how the OOTS could enter, but has anybody suggested some way to dispel the barriers?
-
2019-03-02, 11:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Eastern TN
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I am guessing this is foreshadowing of how Durkon will get turned to stone while casting Dispel Magic on the vamps' minions?
-
2019-03-02, 11:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
that wasn't dvalin's high cleric, that was dvalin himself
also we're talking about a man/god who feels he musn't make a decision without the input of other people no matter how much he wants to even if he's fully capable of making that decision by himself
if there isn't a rule which says that if the council is dominated then the ruling is invalid then I see him fully capable of accepting the ruling of the council even if he's fully aware that the council is dominated just because he ruling has technicly fullfilled all the rules, as far as he knows he has no choice to do otherwiseLast edited by a_flemish_guy; 2019-03-02 at 11:40 AM.
-
2019-03-02, 11:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Last edited by Ruck; 2019-03-02 at 11:52 AM.