The Index of the Giant's Comments III - We've Left a Banana In Charge

[ChristianSt]

I think we've just identified what sets this apart from the other examples: The Geekademia transcript and the use of secondary posts in general doesn't really fit in the established rules, but I don't think it actually violates any of the rules either.

I can certainly agree with "OK, the rules represent consensus, and the rules say this one shouldn't be included, so we have consensus to remove", but this is just a "not clearly established" area. And for those, I think "leave it where it is" is the fair way to go.

Ah ok - I think we kinda run in a sort of misunderstanding there. Maybe (or if I reread my posts quite likely) I should have formulated things better (especially my posts with listing two options).

With the current rules, yeah this is a grey area which could be "solved" with keeping the status quo.

But imo the far better option is to consider a rule that covers it, and if we want a rule: "Q&A are outside the scope" (which would a valid reason to turn down the Twitter Q&A without any further discussion) then we also need to take the consequence of removing the Interview.

Or adding a rule that allows them and maybe (or maybe not) include the Twitter Q&A.

But just keeping this grey area just seems wrong to me.