Originally Posted by
VariaVespasa
[snip] I dont see what would or should prevent Ansom picking off one of the neighboring stacks of dragons since he's there. His forest units cant run away far enough, and he himself either is happy enough with his defense that 20+ B dwagons wasnt an issue (so even the full 50+ shouldnt be too too much), or he has enough personal move left to get himself and his warlords out of the area before the end of turn and the B dwagon counterattack. Either way, the forest units are committed, and there's little difference between attacking and not attacking as far as the warlords are concerned. Any kill they can make now saves them from the slain dwagons attack next turn, and I dont agree that the neighboring dwagon stacks can do much damage to a force intended to destroy 19 dwagons and 3 warlords, even wounded dwagons. It would seem worth it, and would raise Parsons losses from the negligible (3 dwagons) up to 7 dwagons, which I would have reservations about classifying as "almost no cost". "Almost no cost" was a major feature of his plan. 7 might be a worthwhile cost to destroy all the seige, but I dont think it rates as "almost no cost".
[snip] Whatever the reality of the vulnerability or non of the remainder of the platter, and regardless of the temptation of Ansoms presence, its unlikely to be a good idea to attack strong woodsy units in their native terrain, especially if that leaves the seige train undestroyed, so I think its still the best play to primarily complete the destruction of the seige train and disengage back to GK next turn. [snip]