Results 241 to 270 of 2541
-
2009-03-08, 02:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-03-08, 03:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Reply Hazy. Ask again.
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Hmmmm... I've just noticed that I've been random-killed a lot. Why do I have to be the punching bag? Is it the easy-to-drawness of my charecter? The fact that his kind of evil is the kind everyone wants to kill? is is because no one likes me? Is it the fact that I find hilarious and/or disturbing ways of killing you?
-
2009-03-08, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
I kill you with my druids only. Druids rule. I think it might be the ease to draw for the others, but SP came along and noones RKing him.
____
-
2009-03-08, 03:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
You're showing weakness, they're attracted to that like the ravenous blood thirsty animals they all are.
Also
Originally Posted by CrimsonAngel
@v - Don't imply it if you can't supply it.Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-03-08 at 03:46 PM.
-
2009-03-08, 03:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-03-08, 03:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- North
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Last edited by Mina Kobold; 2009-03-08 at 03:47 PM.
Treasured Quotes
-
2009-03-08, 03:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Reply Hazy. Ask again.
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-08, 03:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- In the Playground
-
2009-03-08, 04:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Who wants me to make a new house o' horrors. (ABR)
____
-
2009-03-08, 04:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Alpha Complex
- Gender
-
2009-03-08, 04:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-03-08, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Reply Hazy. Ask again.
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-08, 04:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 04:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
-
2009-03-09, 06:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
I believe 24 hours are up meaning we're not using FAIL.
*totely not trying to revive an old argument... No sarcasm intended*Last edited by Nameless; 2009-03-09 at 06:16 AM.
-
2009-03-09, 06:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- In the mind.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.
Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.
-
2009-03-09, 06:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Very well Nameless, your grasp of time is correct. For once.
It has been over 24 hours since the last vote, and I'll repost the current votes here:
{table=head]For including FAIL|Against including FAIL
BRC|Lemming
Keveak|CrimsonAngel
The Gremlin|Tired N' Drowzy
chriky|Fayte
The Randomizer|Threeshades
VampireRot|Szilard
Ninja Chocobo|bayar
-skimmer-|[/table]
memarch is voting for whoever has the least votes.
Lyinginbedmon is voting for whoever has the most votes.
So they cancel out! (Technically they add 1 to both)
-skimmer- will drop out in case of a draw (but I'm not counting that for now, or it just gets complicated.
For: 9
Against: 8
Last vote: Lyinginbedmon at 10:53PM GMT. Voting ends 11PM on March 11th.Last edited by Keris; 2009-03-10 at 04:10 AM.
-
2009-03-09, 07:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Well since now the argument's been revived...
What bugs me about the whole thing is the "Not use" people are calling for a complete embargo on the term whereas the "use" people have made compromises. It's a give and take process, people!
Anyway. What I propose is that the name is used in the cartoon, and progresses to being used by small children, and adults possibly when in the presence of small children, or using it ironically, or if they're massive geeks regarding the cartoon.
Thus, the term is used, but rarely and in fairly specific circumstances.
Feel free to ignore this, but I consider this the most logical use.I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2009-03-09, 07:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 07:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Last edited by Nameless; 2009-03-09 at 07:33 AM.
-
2009-03-09, 07:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
"Most" being relative here, I assume.
....Yeah, re-reading my post I suppose I do. But again, only rarely and in circumstances.
Memnarch said he'd vote for the side with the least votes, but it's moot for now because now the tallies actually are 8/8.Last edited by Ninja Chocobo; 2009-03-09 at 07:31 AM.
I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2009-03-09, 07:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Last edited by Nameless; 2009-03-09 at 07:36 AM.
-
2009-03-09, 07:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
The table shows who's voted for what, but memarch had voted for whoever is currently losing, so his vote keeps switching. It was 7/8, so memarch counted as voting "For FAIL", so it became 8/8.
I'm only looking to get a couple of throwaway references to FAIL, so as not to throw out someone else's idea.
Well, if you don't want FAIL not to appear in the ABR at all, then I'll put you down as "For Including FAIL".
EDIT: Damn your ninja edit and some forum lag NC!
Not if one group pulls two points ahead, or we wait 48 hours after a tied vote.Last edited by Keris; 2009-03-09 at 07:41 AM.
-
2009-03-09, 07:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 07:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 07:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 08:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
I vote against FAIL.
Why ? It just sounds retarded IMO.**** Photobucket ; RIP avatars
-
2009-03-09, 08:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
-
2009-03-09, 10:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Alpha Complex
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Still arguing about that nonsense? Do you people even understand what "nickname" mean? Who wants call them FAIL, then call them FAIL and who dont, its his choice. After all this is how nicknames has been created (Even the worst like this one). I cant disallow that. (its not like I could even disallow something, but you know what I am trying to say)
-
2009-03-09, 10:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
So can I put your vote down for "For Including FAIL" then?
If you want, I could word it as "Against the Exclusion of FAIL", because it amounts to the same thing.
*Totally not trying to gain as many votes as possible through clever campaigning.*
Which is a lie. I mean, that's the point of campaigning.