Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: New World Order
-
2009-04-24, 02:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- TEXAS and 49 Other States
New World Order
With the results of this battle, I foresee a big change to the world order. Many powers like Jetstone just lost a huge chunk of their forces. Charlie lost many of his Archons which are implied to be very high cost units. This could expose him to attack from people after his arkentool. So while Gobwin Knob is vulnerable, so are a great many other forces. I suspect there will be a lot of fighting as other forces seek to exploit the losses of the coalition forces.
If God had wanted you to live he would not have created me!
-
2009-05-01, 07:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Nowhere important.
- Gender
Re: New World Order
If nothing else, now we know what a 350,000 shmucker scroll can do.
"You crack your foe upside the head."
-
2009-05-03, 09:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
-
2009-05-03, 10:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: New World Order
-
2009-05-03, 10:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Lustria
- Gender
Re: New World Order
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes. (W.Whitman)
Things that increase my self esteem:
-
2009-05-04, 03:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: New World Order
Agreed, ever since the volcanic explosion I have said that Stanley could rule the world on fear alone, getting paid tribute by everyone else so that no "accidents" happen to their pretty cities.
Also,.Spoilerthe variable naming convention in your sig is inconsistentThe whole point of this is lost if you keep it a secret.