Results 181 to 210 of 1503
Thread: MitD - What We Know
-
2009-06-10, 07:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
My personal theory is that it can NOT be a D&D monster. I am not an expert, but no one has found anything that fits every criterion given without either a template or some weird rule changes. Now, some personal thoughts on the matter.
Some form of game baddy. Snorlax is out, due to size and speed problems. However, something from a FF, or other RPG could fit. Indeed, Escape is a spell in the FF universe, and many creatures have it, and Earthquake is another fairly common ability.
-
2009-06-10, 07:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
That isn't too far fetched. Rich has already given the cast of FF6 a cameo, and teleportation spells and abilities are very easy to access and use in those games.
Also, on the stats scale, FF monsters and characters are way higher than D&D characters. The MitD's defense and HP would be so high, that people aren't doing enough damage to matter. The Monster could have been using the Final Fantasy characters' uncanny ability to do anything they want in a cutscene to protect O-Chul and V.Last edited by RdMarquis; 2009-06-10 at 07:43 PM.
-
2009-06-10, 07:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: MitD - What We Know
Here's a question: when did Rich state that we would recognize it? Because having the chronological limit could filter out some possibilities.
Need a place to hang? Like Discord? Don't mind dealing with a capricious demon lord? Then you're welcome to join our LGBTQ+ friendly, often silly, very geeky server to discuss food, music, video games, tabletop, and much more.
Manual of the Planes 5th Edition: for all the things the official 5E Planescape didn't cover. Check it out.
-
2009-06-10, 07:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
a god in a box
-
2009-06-10, 07:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Attard, Malta
- Gender
-
2009-06-10, 07:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
Tonberry. Massive strength, yellow eyes, odd magic, easily recognizable, carries a lantern which covers wishing to be in the light, wields a chef's knife which explains its appetite and wish for stew, and would also explain why everyone is shocked it speaks common instead of say japanese.
-
2009-06-10, 07:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Argentina
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
I believe we know nothing.
-
2009-06-10, 07:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
There are problems with Snorlax:
- it's asleep most of the time;
- you have to have played Pokemon to recognize it.
But size? Snorlax is fat, but "only" 6' 11", which is just about the right size. I'm not sure what you're getting at with speed.
Tonberries, on the other hand, are too small. They reach the knees of FF characters, at most. Besides, holding a kitchen knife does not cover "MitD will eat anything". It's a shame, Tonberries are huggable.
I can't think of FF monsters / summons that have Quake / a stomp ability at the moment. It's worth raking my brain over, though.
-
2009-06-10, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
In FF Crystal Chronicles, the Tonberry chefs are laboring to feed a Gigas Lord and his wife, and IIRC complain about the lack of food for the chefs.
-
2009-06-10, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Attard, Malta
- Gender
-
2009-06-10, 08:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: MitD - What We Know
Why not? It meets nearly all of the requirements for the MitD, namely items 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,12,12,13,14,15,16,17,18, and 19 from Onyavar's list above. I would theorize that the inconsistencies with the other few criteria are due to his strange childhood and life with Xykon and Redcloak.
Also, the fact that they are usually (not always) personal attendants to gods or in else in charge of "some INCREDIBLY important task" is flavor text in the Monster Manual that did not make it to the SRD, so it might not apply to the comic.
-
2009-06-10, 08:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
Well, I'm going with a (now) Young Adult Prismatic Dragon. Runted to fit in the frame of the cartoon. The plane shift or lesser wish 'get out of jail free card' was spontaneous sorcerous casting.
Epic Dragons
Usually Neutral, Insane DR (20/epic), and sorcerous, so intuative magical abilities that it doesn't really understand. Also explains why it is being kept in the dark (limit its prismatic powers) and the beautiful/frightening thing (dragon awe/fear). Only issue: the size. But we've seen bigger things shoved into smaller spaces to fit the comic.
-
2009-06-10, 08:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- La Puente, CA
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
SoD
SpoilerThe evidence is not overwhelming. Our hunters do not say they recognize it, merely that it is not a local creature. They imply they know it, but they do not say so. An alternate reading is that they do not want to admit not knowing.
Redcloak is more definite here, but it too can be read more vaguely to mean he merely knew the MitD was able to beat up the entire circus if it wanted.
The presumption is that MitD is a known type, at least to experts, but SoD does not nail that down. and it could be something quite different.
Again this depends on the hunters being accurate and honest witnesses. We might note here that Redcloak seems unconcerned with MitD talking
Originally Posted by Borris
So no, it was not expecting O-Chul to succeed back in the 540s due to any success with wishes it has had in the past. It simply had a child-like faith that wishing would make it so.
Originally Posted by DanReiv
Originally Posted by alegollama
-
2009-06-10, 08:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Montreal QC, Canada
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
It's certainly not a Final Fantasy (or other intellectual property) monster. If the Giant had to change the Band-Aid box between the online strip and the sold book to cover the possibility of lawsuits, I doubt we would get to see a creature taken from a video game, unless it's one so well-known that it's gone into popular culture.
What the MitD may be, if not a D&D monster, is one of the many creatures from pop culture, Greek mythology, generic Halloween monsters, etc. It may also be an old 1st or 2nd edition D&D monster that used to be iconic, but hasn't been transposed into more recent books.
-
2009-06-10, 08:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: MitD - What We Know
The context of that makes it really unlikely Wish applied there. It's made very clear that it's stomping the ground that did it (see the roach's lines).
As has been pointed out, one of the sources of the hunters' surprise was that it could speak Common. I think the bigger problem at this point might be having spell-like abilities. (And the whole had-a-father thing. Frankly, I'd be surprised if it turned out to be a tarrasque.)
It's not a gaming session until someone quotes Monty Python! Someone said something that caused me to riff on it being the Dread Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog in another thread, actually.
Sabine doesn't speak in a different color either. Your point?
Whose recognition of him are we talking about? The hunters? It could be fairly common in the OOTS-verse. The readers? Rich did not say we would all recognize it immediately, just that it already existed and we could guess it.
Well, now we know why they keep him in the darkness!
That's purely speculative.
Again, all Rich said was that it was pre-existing, not that it was iconic as Godzilla.
I was just going to ask what the problem was with it being a dragon.Avatar courtesy azuyomi244.
98% of the internet has a Myspace. If you're one of the 2% who isn't an emo whiner, show solidarity by putting this in your sig.
Instead, I have a blog and web site: http://morganwick.com Tweeter: http://twitter.com/morganwick Webcomic (not really OOTS-related): http://morganwick.freehostia.com/webcomic
Official self-appointed former commentator for The Sticks Awards.
-
2009-06-10, 08:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- :noitacoL
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
I found another one! 259. I'll edit my first post...
done.
-
2009-06-10, 08:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Attard, Malta
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
What would a Celestial being be doing on an earth plane, helping a lich? Taking orders from a lich? And I think a being THAT powerful would be used for 'incredibly important tasks', its damage reduction weakness is for epic weapons. Its not meant to pop out and get Pelor's daily newspaper. That sort of thing could easily crush a pit fiend without breaking into a sweat.
Also it has 23 Intel and 25 Wisdom. I doubt it'd be usign the terminology "Mister Stiffly", and commenting on not having eaten beans that day.
-
2009-06-10, 09:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
slashing
i think the "DR vs Slashing" entry is a red herring. there is no reason to assume the MitD has DR vs slashing. what we know is that he thought Miko's swords tickled and he didn't notice Belkar's attacks.. this could be the result of insanely high HP as easily as it could be DR. Also, its DR could be /- or /cold iron or /daffodils.
also, i'm convinced V & O'C's escape was a Wish effect, & ruling out creatures who can't do some kind of Wish effect may be the best process of elimination.
-
2009-06-10, 09:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
I'd like to take issue with a lot of those "facts". Not that I'm claiming to know they're wrong, but they're not as "proven" as you seem to be assuming.
1. Maybe belongs to a species. But as an alternative, it may belong to an identifiable type of creature, such as "tentacled monstrosity", without necessarily being easily identified as a specific species.
5. Unknown homeland - sure, but is it a "land" at all? Maybe a time, dimension, or completely different ruleset.
6. Not necessarily true - all we know is that Redcloak (if I recall aright) was surprised that it could speak Common. That may be because it's unusual for its species, but it may also be just because Redcloak is ignorant 'cuz he's never met one before.
7 and 8. Does not recognise the gates even when he looks straight at them. Maybe an Important Clue.
SpoilerYog-Sothoth is the Gate. Yog-Sothoth is the Key and Guardian of the Gate. Of course he wouldn't recognise Dorukan's Gate, because it's a completely different type of "gate" from a completely different mythos.
9. Again, all we know is that Xykon thinks it's not immune to mind-affecting spells. Xykon could be wrong.
It's a long shot, but I'd like to place my Monopoly money on the creature named in the above spoiler.Last edited by veti; 2009-06-10 at 09:18 PM.
-
2009-06-10, 09:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Appalachian State
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
Just a quick question/observation: Some people have been suggesting that the spell/ability MitD used to save V and O-Chul could have been touch range. If that were the case, wouldn't it have affected Xykon too, as he was touching them when it happened? Based on that, I'd say that whatever MitD used, it probably wasn't a touch range spell.
Self-Proclaimed Disco Bandit in the Playground
-
2009-06-10, 09:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
-
2009-06-10, 09:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: MitD - What We Know
+1 vote against Tarrasq
Re the things we know, we are all falling into the habit of thinking that the teleportation of o'chul and V are at the hands of the MITD.
We do not have enough evidence to say that with certainty.
My thinking is that in the next few strips we will have more info based on where V and O'Chul end up.
At the moment the roach reactions are the main reason we give credence to the idea that Mitd has some ranged teleport or wish.
-
2009-06-10, 09:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: MitD - What We Know
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2009-06-10, 10:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
I will soon have all of these strips tacked to the wall of my apartment for reference, as I sit in the dark, scribbling wild theories about the identity of the MitD and drinking some lukewarm caffinated beverage.
-
2009-06-10, 10:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
Great work, a massive community service. I was thinking of making a similar list with hidden equipment in D&D books, but that's too massive.
-
2009-06-10, 10:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
Looking at the MitD strips, I noticed for the first time that the speech bubbles are those of normal living people, rather than elementals, ghosts, undead, fiends, imps, celestials, ancient black dragons, and evil Vaarsuvius.
Impressive list of strips.
-
2009-06-10, 10:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- La Puente, CA
- Gender
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
Our master compilation says MitD appears in 55 strips, plus 7 in which it appears in 2 or more extra pages. So there is still one or two to find.
113 & 120 seem to be them.Last edited by David Argall; 2009-06-10 at 10:56 PM.
-
2009-06-11, 02:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- A dungeon
Re: Every. Single. Mitd. Strip. Ever. (Took a long time.)
From what I've noticed though constructs do not have a telltale speech bubble. My Zodar theory has gained a little more ground now.
-
2009-06-11, 04:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: MitD - What We Know
Yessir. I know that and already mentioned it in this very thread. My pet theory about the snarl offspring is also based on neglecting some of the more questionable "facts".
So perhaps I'll make a new list where I also state which facts are "proven" and which are disputable assumptions made by forumites.
Expect this new list to come up next time when the Giant provides us an opportunity to freak out about the MitD.
In the meantime, I will do some research here. Thanks to Belkar=awesome for this thread!
-
2009-06-11, 06:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- London, UK
Re: MitD - What We Know
My thoughts are that it's one of these:
Spoiler
1) Gated, mindraped (or similar) Solar
2) Gated, mindraped (or similar) Pit Fiend
(The second seems more likely with the explorers being surprised it spoke common)
3) Some kind of godspawn. Like, Thor got really drunk and had a baby with the Tarrasque (if anyone could, it'd be a god). The baby looks like a Tarrasque, but is smaller due to an intervention by the godly parent to hide the evidence, and can both talk and occasionally pull off godlike stuff.
Last edited by paddyfool; 2009-06-11 at 11:11 AM.