Results 1 to 30 of 62
-
2010-10-05, 10:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Ukriane
- Gender
Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I want to know that is it me ONLY who hates subnormality or everybody else? Here is a link: http://www.viruscomix.com/subnormality.html
I just find the attitude so cocky, its not the "Jokingly laugh at people" like xkcd where it at the same time makes me aware of your own problems while not punching me in the face but more like "Your all stupid, im smart, you should all act like me"
And there are also issues covered in this comic which are not allowed to be on this site... They are covered in the most offensive and cruel way possible.
Yet at the same time there is a single strip that just cheers me up whenever I read it: http://www.viruscomix.com/page528.html
It just feels amazing that both where written by the same person.
What do you thinkLast edited by SpekterofDavid; 2010-10-05 at 10:51 AM.
Makin Pancakes since 1985
-
2010-10-05, 11:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Read the first few pages, quite a lot of text heavy ones that I don't get or that seem oriented towards subgroups I'm not a part of or something.
Do you have any specific examples of pages that bothered you? I didn't see anything that offended me in the earlier pages, mostly random attempts at humour, but don't really like the comic enough to read much further just to find examples myself.
My 100% original pixelart fantasy webcomic, Hero oh Hero.
Webcomic discussion thread: https://forums.giantitp.com/showthre...7-Hero-Oh-Hero
-
2010-10-05, 11:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
http://viruscomix.wordpress.com/2007...-subnormality/
...and who refuses to read “giant wall(s)” of text. It’s true: people who don’t like reading (ie: The Illiterate, babies, etc.) aren’t gonna like my comic. I suppose he thinks books have “too many words” as well.
–Rowntree
1) Brevity is wit
2) Your excess dialogue adds nothing
3) Your walls of text are poorly formatted and written in a terrible, eyesore font.
-
2010-10-05, 11:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Ukriane
- Gender
-
2010-10-05, 11:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- where the wind blows
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
What? How do you know that? I always think that the comic's attitude is jokingly laugh at people.
And sorry. There on the post above me you also shoved your point of view. Next you'll say that webcomic must have good art and webcomic with stick figures are stupid. Awebcomiccomic can have as many or as little text as they want.Last edited by Fri; 2010-10-05 at 11:54 AM.
You got Magic Mech in My Police Procedural!
In this forum, Gaming is Serious Business, and Anyone Can Die. Not even your status as the Ensemble Darkhorse can guarantee your survival.
Disciple of GITP Trope-Fu Temple And Captain of GITP Valkyrie Squadron.
Awesome Elizabeth Shelley by HollamerSpoiler
The OTP in the playground.
My Gallery/My Star Wolves 3 LP
-
2010-10-05, 12:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Ukriane
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
http://www.viruscomix.com/page433.html
There. There are other strips like it but..It just mentions the obvious (Like My post above). Chocolate health bars are rippoffs, duh men cannot take hot chicks who are smart (this was done 2 times).
Webcomics may, but in those terms if I removed the comic and added a few lines about Person talking with another the art would add nothing, there are no movements.
Ps: I love oots, why do you think Im here?Last edited by SpekterofDavid; 2010-10-05 at 12:05 PM.
Makin Pancakes since 1985
-
2010-10-05, 12:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Tangent of a tangent:
Good art obviously helps. Most stick figure comics are stupid and lazy though. Some suit the comic (mostly for non-plots) and this is fine. A lot of the humour comes in cartoony graphics where realism wouldn't work. This doesn't hold for most plot comics.
Other people do it because they're unskilled, lazy (unwilling to improve through practice or care about their work) or for some reason can't. Maybe they're copying the art style of another comic (usually done by young people who haven't come into their own.) These people usually fail to take into account the restrictions and limitations of their chosen minimalism, and make an inferior product.
There is also a difference between laziness and effort, and to call them equal because "it's minimalism" is just insulting to the people who actually try. I've seen a lot of people wax lyrical about apparently amazing simplistic comics that achieve so much with so little and blah blah. They add these details themselves (again, can be good but usually not intentional on the author's part.)
Bad art does not make a webcomic bad, but bad art is still bad art.
Awebcomiccomic can have as many or as little text as they want.
You cannot deny that dialogue affects this. It is pointless, excessive and an eyesore. A consequence of bad writing(?) that makes the comic less amusing, effective and even tiresome. It seems like the comics just a medium for cramming his opinions down your throat (like this post but with pretense) and an inability to separate himself from his work.Last edited by T-O-E; 2010-10-05 at 12:44 PM.
-
2010-10-05, 03:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Yeah, I never really got into Sub-Normality, and one major reason is its text/dialogue problems. Although I never really saw anything offensive in it, maybe I just didn't get far enough.
Now, I generally don't mind walls of text, but Sub-Normality's are just terrible - all shoved together in a hard-to-read font. It makes it nearly impossible for me to read through it all, especially when so much of it is redundant or unnecessary.
And while I do agree that comics with lots of words isn't necessarily a bad thing, the point of comics is to show things graphically - any words need to complement that. Sometimes lots of words can do that, sometimes it's better to just use a few.
-
2010-10-05, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Denmark
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I must dissapoint you, SpekterofDavid. Yes, there are some wall-of-text, but some of the comics are just too funny!
http://www.viruscomix.com/page472.htmlBad to the Bone!
Miko Miyazaki : Strip #120 - #464 : R.I.P.
-
2010-10-05, 03:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- The land of corn
- Gender
-
2010-10-05, 07:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Japan
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
How about this is a guy who can draw well so he tells his stories with illustrations so he doesn't have to set scenes or describe people or anything? Is it a rule that if you draw people on the same sheet of paper you've written on you have to devote the whole thing to the illustrations because comics?
Anyway, the walls of text are usually presented in the context of a character going on a big rant. I've seen this sort of thing a lot in movies, so why can't he try it in a comic?
I don't agree with his opinions, but I still appreciate what he's trying to do here. This is a guy who manages to convey a good part of his view of the world when he writes, and it can even be entertaining sometimes. I consider this an okay comic overall.Last edited by Claudius Maximus; 2010-10-05 at 07:41 PM.
Editor and playtester for Legend.
-
2010-10-05, 11:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
There's a balance to be maintained between writing and illustration. A story with no text has a hard time conveying its meaning, like silent movies of yesteryear. A story with too much text is called a book.
Avatar by Glasswhistle
-
2010-10-05, 11:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
This webcomic didn't ring any bells with me, so I took a peek at the latest comic... gah the words so many barely legible words!!!
If you're going to make a wordy comic, for goodness sake make the text easy to read! I can barely read this hand-written comic without squinting and slowing my reading speed down to a crawl - and for such a text heavy comic that's inexcusable.
-
2010-10-06, 02:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I don't have problems reading his text. I do have a problem, however, waiting between 15 and 30 seconds for the image to finish loading...
Hark! An avatar drawn by Kate Beaton!
-
2010-10-06, 04:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- where the wind blows
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Indeed. I don't particularly like it, but it's a lot of people's favourite. From what I see, you're just angry because you don't share his opinion and vice versa.
And it seems that spectreofdavid missed the point of why I linked that particular article. By linking it, I was trying to show that you're trying to force your view on what comics/webcomics should be like the linked article. Not because I thought you hate stick figures comic, spectreofdavid.
And yeah, T-O-E, I agree that in this particular example, the wall of text is bad. But it's not because there's a rule about "comic shouldn't have a lot of text." It's about particular examples. A lot of well regarded comics/graphic novels got godly amount of wall-of-text but they're good and well received by peoples.
It's like saying, hmm... one particular chef uses a lot of beef in his cooking and it tastes bad, so obviously beef is bad for cooking and nobody should ever use it.
And once again, I must say that I can't see that he's more hostile toward other groups/subculture than other webcomic with similar premises. His disclaimer about people who don't like his comic are those who hate reading and must think that books have too many words?
XKCD got a disclaimer that his comic got advanced mathematic which isn't for liberal arts major (which incidentally I am).
I think it's called 'tongue in cheek' in case you never heard about that phrase before.
But honestly, I don't really like subnormality as well, though it got some gold there.Last edited by Fri; 2010-10-06 at 05:12 AM.
You got Magic Mech in My Police Procedural!
In this forum, Gaming is Serious Business, and Anyone Can Die. Not even your status as the Ensemble Darkhorse can guarantee your survival.
Disciple of GITP Trope-Fu Temple And Captain of GITP Valkyrie Squadron.
Awesome Elizabeth Shelley by HollamerSpoiler
The OTP in the playground.
My Gallery/My Star Wolves 3 LP
-
2010-10-06, 04:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Germany (North)
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
So many bad metaphors... oh dear lord, so much text! @_@
(Really, author? You can't tell all that crap in four sentences? You have to squish a thousand words into each bubble? And then have the nerve to barely say anything at all? Screw that noise. )Last edited by Domochevsky; 2010-10-06 at 04:53 AM.
-
2010-10-06, 06:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Ukriane
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I realized after I re-read that alot of my stuff was hard to comprehend. So here
I do not like subnormality because
Constant Anti Religious overtones, Im not that religious and im not that offended. Its that it exists.
Strawman Argument techniques, pretty much any "Argument" is mostly between one smart person and other people acting stereotypically stupid
Its not Completely bad, Its that most of the time the srtip is usualy, silly clever and fun. Just the straw men strips above are really unsettling.
Thats pretty much it. Sorry for the inconvenience and supprisingly, I dont hate the text blocks that much. Im OK with them. But I still stand by the fact that most of these text blocks are poorly orginized and completely miss the simplicity point of a comic.
Edit: Xkcds Claim that biology is a core condescend sociology is absolute bull. Ill stop it with the metaphors, thats just WRONG! Saying that litarature analisis is for stupid people (While saying "Just look at wikapedia") is absolute bull.Last edited by SpekterofDavid; 2010-10-06 at 07:47 AM.
Makin Pancakes since 1985
-
2010-10-06, 06:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Last edited by T-O-E; 2010-10-06 at 06:50 AM.
-
2010-10-06, 07:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Icy North
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I'm gonna join the choir of "wordy comic's aren't neccessarily bad!"
I love reading. I love words, and language and everything related to it. I read a lot of text that's bland, boring or without interesting content, but if I have to read something for my enjoyment, it has to be well-written. A lot of comics do this (Something Positive and, sometimes, Pictures of You springs to mind).
Answering that "you don't like my comic's amount of text, so you must hate reading!" is just... immature.
So is his approach to pop culture. Maybe it's just me, but I kinda grew out of the whole "hating pop culture" fase when I left my teen years. I still don't care much for most of it, but really, my hate was just a childish, bitter reaction, and I left it behind when I realised that there were much better feelings I could replace it with (why hate the world when I can just love myself? - as corny as it sounds ).
Of course I can't use this to judge Rowntree for certain, but I still can't help but feel that childishness and bitterness must somehow be involved.
I'm a bit sad that some of you compare Subnormality to xkcd. XKCD isn't hating on anyone or taking a higher stance, it's ironically mocking everything, including itself.
The disclaimer on xkcd reads:"Warning: this comic occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)"
Rowntree says: "I did feel it was important to go on record as being a certain kind of person–ie: the kind of person who hates Bush and Nickelback and Hummers and all that other crap that thoughtless people embrace. This strip ain’t for them–it’s for the rest of us."Last edited by Glass Mouse; 2010-10-06 at 07:11 AM.
Spoiler
Challenge badge, courtesy of HeadlessMermaid.
Avatar courtesy of the talented Neoriceisgood. Features Pumpkin from my webcomic.
-
2010-10-06, 10:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Madison
- Gender
-
2010-10-06, 11:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Wow, I didn't know people felt this strongly about this comic. Subnormality is actually one of my favorite comics. I love the walls of text and I don't have any problem reading them. I love the outrageous art and how he packs so many crazy details into each scene. I'm also not really seeing the hate of pop culture. I mean, the guy has a definite social liberal bent, so if that's not your cup of tea, that's cool. I'm not a big fan of Mallard Fillmore, but that doesn't mean Tinsley's comic is inferior. I guess, to each his own.
-
2010-10-06, 03:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- East Coast, USA
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
If you don't like it, don't read it. Some people love XKCD (since that seems to be the comic we are using for reference), some people hate it. It's all a matter of opinion.
-
2010-10-06, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
But people can say they like it and why they like it, and is that not opinion too? Why the dichotomy? Must we add "in my honest personal opinion" before everything we say? What would be the point? It's implied anyway, I think. Or should we cast away all of our opinions and remind ourselves that everything is equal no matter what we do or how hard (or little) we try?
Besides, this is a discussion thread, not a praise thread. In fact it was started as a hate thread.
"If you don't like it, don't read it."
I personally read crap to find out what not to do and what I personally dislike. I think it also helps me to appreciate the good things even more. No light without dark, good without evil etc.
It's also fun to see someone completely ruin something and to vent about that. I respect the medium and I don't think everything's "just opinion."
I can understand if you don't see my point, but surely you've made fun of something and enjoyed it at some point in your life? Many, many forms of comedy thrive on this, including your xkcd. Can't you relate?
Also I was not talking about xkcd, in case you were wondering.
Justmy opinion.
Last edited by T-O-E; 2010-10-06 at 03:23 PM.
-
2010-10-06, 05:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Hark! An avatar drawn by Kate Beaton!
-
2010-10-06, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Icy North
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Niice!
Also, everything T-O-E said.
I'm not trying to judge or hate on anyone who likes something other than me, so there's no need to be offended when I voice an opinion. Really, I'm nowhere near smart enough to judge something like taste (and I don't think anyone is. A lot of people seem to think they are, though... which is, ironically, the only thing I'll truly, secure-on-my-high-horse critisize people for).Spoiler
Challenge badge, courtesy of HeadlessMermaid.
Avatar courtesy of the talented Neoriceisgood. Features Pumpkin from my webcomic.
-
2010-10-06, 08:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Subnormality- A Review
Now, I came into this comic blind. "Subnormality?" I said, scratching my head. "Perhaps a quirky 'comedy' about nerds ala CAD? A slightly pretentious stick comic, like xkcd? Hell, a comic about an ice-based supervillain and his never-ending struggle with society?"
Nope. Instead, pretentiousness.
Pinpointing a decline in Subnormality was almost ridiculously simple. This one. All comics before it are fun little strips. Surreal, yes, but enjoyable. Afterwards starts a horrible trend of rants headed towards punchlines that finished a panel ago. Pretentiousness flows from every other comic. Sure, a few manage to not have "f*** society " as the punchline, but damn if it isn't a chore to find. I kept having to double check, just to make sure that one comic wasn't a bland statement about America.
But about the art, yes, it is indeed competent. Which only makes it more depressing. I mean, this guy could've made a fun comic. It would've been pretty good. But no, we can't let those americans live their lives! They're horrible, lying, sexist, petty....
You get the idea. Are there things wrong with the world? I'd be an idiot if I said no. But I don't need a pretentious ass to tell me that.
tl;dr: Essentially liberal!Diversity Lane, but with enough real jokes to avoid being be downright horrible. A 4/10.
Originally Posted by SaintRidley
*(buzzword!)
Note: On xkcd: Hit or miss.Last edited by TheLaughingMan; 2010-10-06 at 08:27 PM.
Previous Avatars:
Spoiler
Old Avatar by PersonalSaivor.
Ponytar by akrim.elf
Originally Posted by The Lost Eyeball
-
2010-10-06, 08:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- The land of corn
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
I can't help but giggle at it.
Ditto for these ones, though not nearly as much:
http://www.viruscomix.com/page446.html
http://www.viruscomix.com/page503.html
http://www.viruscomix.com/page484.html
http://www.viruscomix.com/page457.html
And these three, if you can take the time to read them, are just all kinds of awesome in my mind:
http://www.viruscomix.com/page505.html (Completely transparent, but I like it anyway)
http://www.viruscomix.com/page473.html
http://www.viruscomix.com/page500.html
And, being the gigantic Metroid fan I am, how can I say no to Lara Croft and Samus with a cameo by the Duke himself?
http://www.viruscomix.com/page479.html
-
2010-10-07, 12:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Japan
- Gender
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Editor and playtester for Legend.
-
2010-10-07, 10:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Previous Avatars:
Spoiler
Old Avatar by PersonalSaivor.
Ponytar by akrim.elf
Originally Posted by The Lost Eyeball
-
2010-10-07, 11:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- England
Re: Sub-Normality...This Comic has no shame
Last edited by Zanaril; 2010-10-07 at 11:32 AM.
This post may contain sarcasm.
DeviantArt