Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Equivalence of the Three Magics
-
2012-04-20, 11:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Minnesota, MN
- Gender
Equivalence of the Three Magics
Hi, I was wondering to what extent Psionics, Arcane, and Divine were the same. I know that psionic resistance = arcane resistance, and since both arcane and divine are "spells", everything that talks about "spells" applies to both (unless it specifies "arcane" or "divine", of course).
But to what extent does power=spell, and manifest=cast?
If you need a particular example to explain one way or the other, I have one. Do Mage Slayer and Pierce Magical Protection apply to psionic stuff as well?
If I need to clarify better, let me know, and I'll edit this post.
-
2012-04-21, 12:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- NY, USA
- Gender
Re: Equivalence of the Three Magics
Well, first of all, Spell Resistance is not necessarily Power Resistance. It relies on the campaign's position with regards to Magic / Psionics transparency, which is spelled out in the Expanded Psionics Handbook. Still, most games operate with full transparency, primarily because the alternative is a bit of a mess.
-Edit-
Removed TL;DR off-topic rant on spell-caster fluff. Nothing of value was lost.Last edited by Water_Bear; 2012-04-21 at 12:23 AM.
-
2012-04-21, 12:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- NY, USA
- Gender
Re: Equivalence of the Three Magics
Eep. The dangers of posting at 1am.
Sorry, I didn't address your question too much. Basically; it depends on your campaign. The EPH has two or three versions of how Spells and Powers interact and each DM has to choose one.
Still almost all of them will pick the option which treats them as the same thing. Otherwise it would be way too much book-keeping and have weird repercussions.
-
2012-04-21, 12:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Minnesota, MN
- Gender
Re: Equivalence of the Three Magics
>.>
*sigh* I am aware that the equality I stated was campaign specific, but it seemed to present itself as saying "they aren't always equal, but it makes balance easier".
I also feel like you may have not understood my question. I am not asking "what is the difference between the three", I am asking "in terms of strict rules, when are they the same?"
For the sake of getting to my actual question faster, assume a campaign in which arcane, divine, and psionics are equally present in the world, and none are secret to the commonfolk.
Now, more examples
like, if I see "spellcaster" can I read that as "spellcaster/manifester"? (or whatever the correct term is)
Or if I see spells/spell-like abilities can I read it as spells/spell-like abilities/powers/power-like abilities?
Next, my original question. Do Mage Slayer and Pierce Magical Protection apply to psionic stuff as well? Meaning, say in the case of PMP, if my foe buffed his/her AC with a psionic power, would the PMP help at all? Or with Mage Slayer, would I screw up the concentration checks for a Psion to stay psionically focused?
Edit: sorry for the irritation in my post. Today isn't the best ^^;
-
2012-04-21, 12:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Minnesota, MN
- Gender
-
2012-04-21, 12:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- NYC
- Gender
Re: Equivalence of the Three Magics
The default (and less headachey) one is Psionic-Magic transparency - Null Psionics Field shuts down magic, Orange Ioun Stone gives +1 to Manifester Level and so forth. However, feats are not affected by Psionic-Magic transparency, so Mage Slayer and PMP don't hurt your manifester level, but also don't touch manifesting defensively or psionic defenses. Read more about it here.
-
2012-04-21, 12:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Minnesota, MN
- Gender
Re: Equivalence of the Three Magics
That..... that's kind of dumb.
If they go so far as to make the rule apply to everything else, why not feats? If in every other context powers=spells (basically), why shouldn't feats affect them the same, if they are basically equivalent?
*sigh* well, thanks for the link. much appreciate it.
-
2012-04-21, 12:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- NYC
- Gender