Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
-
2024-03-01, 10:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2024
3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
In another forum there is a discussion happening about how monsters in 3.0 progressed in a way that was much simpler to DMs to handle. Namely, they got far less skill points (and I believe this was a set amount depending on HD) and far less feats.
Did any 3.0 players find this to be a better system for running games? Why or why not?
-
2024-03-01, 11:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Personally, I felt the opposite was true.
In 3.0, how many feats and skills a monster got was wildly different depending on their creature type. In 3.5, monsters use the same rules for getting skills and feats that characters use (with their creature type defining their skill points per HD just like a character class does).
-
2024-03-01, 11:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2024
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
-
2024-03-01, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Pretty much that, yeah. I've got the MM2 here, and boy, do they have crazy rules for some types in 3.0. Here, take a look:
Type Skill points Feats Aberrations, Elementals (2 x Int-Score)+(2 x EHD) Int-Bonus + 1/4 EHD Animals, Beasts, Vermin 10 to 15 None Constructs, Oozes, Plants None None Dragons (6 + Int-Mod) x HD 1 + 1/4 HD Fey, Undead (3 x Int-Score)+(2 x EHD) 1 + Int-Bonus + 1/4 EHD Giants, Humanoids 6 + Int-Mod + EHD 1 + 1/4 EHD Magical Beasts, Shapechangers (2 x Int-Score) + EHD 1 + Int-Bonus + 1/4 EHD Monstrous Humanoid (2 x Int-Score)+(2 x EHD) 1 + Int-Bonus + 1/4 EHD Outsiders (8 + Int-Mod.) x HD 1 + 1/4 HD
EHD means Extra Hit Dice, i.e. for improved creatures. Compare that to the much simpler system we have in 3.5, which follows the same rules as character classes do:
Type Skill points Aberrations, Animals, Constructs, Elementals, Giants, Humanoids, Magical Beasts, Monstrous Humanoids, Oozes, Plants, Vermin (2 + Int-Mod) x (HD + 3) Deathless, Undead (4 + Int-Mod) x (HD + 3) Dragons, Fey (6 + Int-Mod) x (HD + 3) Outsiders (8 + Int-Mod) x (HD + 3)
Feats for all: 1 + 1/3 HD.
Edit: I won't deny that it's sometimes difficult to actually spend all those skill points or feats when brewing my own creatures, but I find it much easier to calculate them.Last edited by Tzardok; 2024-03-01 at 12:21 PM.
-
2024-03-01, 12:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
I've always found that the easiest way to spend skill points for quickly built characters is just pick a number of skills equal to X+int mod (where X depends on the creature type/class), and just completely max that many number of skills. It's much harder to spend 66 skill points than it is to pick 6 skills to max out.
World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2024-03-01, 01:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Yeah, that's what I've been doing most of the time, but sometimes you get more skills that way than actually fit. For example, recently I made a giant worm with an Int of 3, but it was an outsider so it still got a load of skill points. Enough to max out four skills, but I could only find two skills that actually fit it. And don't get me started on how often I miscounted the number of feats a high HD creature was supposed to get and gave it one too few.
-
2024-03-01, 01:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Out of curiosity, were the two skills Escape Artist and Move Silently?
My Perpetually-Unfinished Homebrew: Tier-3 Class Suite, Homestuck Races for Pathfinder, Homestuck Races for 5e, Psionic Class Redux
-
2024-03-01, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
For the giant outsider worm? No, it got Climb and Concentrate as additional skills (the first two where Swim and Listen).
-
2024-03-01, 02:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2024
-
2024-03-01, 02:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Nottingham, England
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Fascinating, thank you for posting this. I always thought they just gave them however many skills they wanted them to have as there was no obvious pattern, it's good to know how they actually did it.
All correct, except that mindless creatures don't get any feats or skill points (so most constructs and oozes and effectively all vermin).
-
2024-03-02, 08:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
If you, as the DM, are having a hard time coming up with enough skills or feats for a monster, don't sweat it. A skill or feat that it never uses is, in practice, no different from one it never has, and nobody's going to be interacting with it in enough detail to tell. Or if, in the extremely rare case that it ever becomes relevant whether it has some skill or not, just decide whether it does or not at that moment. The DM is allowed to retcon occasionally.
Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2024-03-02, 02:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
-
2024-03-03, 05:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Nottingham, England
- Gender
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
Those were my thoughts, I've never had difficulty picking feats for monsters unless they have a truly enormous number of hit dice. Far more often I have the opposite problem, not being able to give them all the feats I want them to have.
In case it's of use to anybody, here's my list of "standard feats" which are useful for many different monsters (most don't complicate them in play):
Anybody: Improved Toughness (CW), Improved Initiative, Danger Sense (CAdv), Improved Critical, Great Fortitude, Lightning Reflexes, Iron Will, Ability Focus, Weapon Focus, Luck feats (CSco),
Casters: Practised Spellcaster (CArc/CDiv), Extend Spell, Quicken Spell
SLA users: Practised Magic (Shackled City), Quicken Spell-like Ability, Supernatural Transformation (SavSp)
Natural Attack users: Improved Natural Attack, Multiattack, Improved Multiattack, Rapidstrike (Drac), Improved Rapidstrike (Drac)
Bruisers: Steadfast Determination (PHB2, requires Endurance), Power Attack
Grapplers: Multigrab (SavSp), Greater Multigrab (SavSp)
Fliers: Improved Flight (CAdv)
Breath Weapon users: Metabreath feats (Drac)Last edited by Biggus; 2024-03-06 at 07:53 AM.
-
2024-03-04, 08:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
Re: 3.0 monster progression vs 3.5
3.0s rules were a confusing mess. I can put less feats or skills if I feel like it, but it's much more difficult to determine what they are actually supposed to have with 3.0.
Also, picking skills and feats is easy, as Biggus has shown above.
This is where Perform (Oratory) comes into. While it devoures the adventurers it speaks gentle soliloquis about the nature of fate. And you also give it Sense Motive to understand if the audience is engaged.Chaos is I.
Evil is Me.
Good is Us.
Law is We.