New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 241 to 270 of 377
  1. - Top - End - #241
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Rogar Demonblud View Post
    I was re-reading Don't Split the Party and noticed that The Giant stated that we'd be meeting another of the factions involved in trying to control the gates (presumably, the people who cast the scrying spell at the fake gate site).

    Wouldn't this make a heck of a time to add that complication?
    Like Kish said, that was Zz'dtri, as confirmed by Nale and the Giant.

    However, as of now I presume that bit in the commentary was alluding to Tarquin.
    THE SCRYING EYE AT THE END OF STRIP #698 WAS ZZ'DTRI'S (SOURCE)

  2. - Top - End - #242
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    BlueWizardGirl

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    So, anyone care to stand in for Thor ('cause he's busy) and offer Durkon suggestions on how to get out of this mess?

    The only strong option I can come up with is to take a lesson from the scene with Thanh in Book IV and engineer a situation in which obeying Malack's commands requires Belkar to harm Mr. Scruffy, and hope that's sufficiently contrary to Belkar's nature that it throws off the spell (and makes him really mad at Malack). Any way of doing that besides using Mr. Scruffy as a shield (which stands a high chance of making Belkar furious with Durkon rather than with Malack) currently escapes me, though. Unless the cat's smart enough to deliberately interpose himself (or, alternately, just gets in the way accidentally).

    Other ideas?

  3. - Top - End - #243
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Iowa City, IA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Damn, so much for being 1 low-level spell away from melee support. The Giant juked me again.

  4. - Top - End - #244
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    WoLong's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2013

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutant Sheep View Post
    Gotta love Malack hanging side down. Vampire lizards play strange bats.
    Yeah, that looked really wierd.

  5. - Top - End - #245
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Loving Malack more and more: the mist, the eyes, the hanging out around the corner. A little bit lost, maybe a little bitter?
    Durkon is proving to be more capable than when the rest of OotS is around.
    Mr. Scruffy with the surprised eyes.
    Good story, good story telling.
    Thanks, Giant!
    Last edited by Ivrytwr; 2013-02-28 at 09:48 PM.

  6. - Top - End - #246
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Deepbluediver's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The US of A

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Does this comic give anyone else bad vibes? Durkon in that second-to-last panel seems to be exuding an aura of "I'm only 1 day away from retirement" or something similar.

    Maybe it's just me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rater202 View Post
    It's not called common because the sense is common, it's called common because it's about common things.
    Homebrew Extended Signature!

  7. - Top - End - #247
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    NinjaGirl

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Here.
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    First of all: Amazing. I can't wait for the next one, and I'm so glad that this is the 9-in-a-row. Malack's gaseous form looks amazing, and I love the subtlety of the Vampiric Gaze casting panel, as well as the effects on his eyes when he does it.

    Second: I was reading over the archives in response to this strip, and I noticed http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0333.html

    If Durkon does get vamped... I don't think he's going to wind up buried alongside his ancestors...

  8. - Top - End - #248
    Orc in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    May 2011

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by LadyEowyn View Post
    So, anyone care to stand in for Thor ('cause he's busy) and offer Durkon suggestions on how to get out of this mess?

    The only strong option I can come up with is to take a lesson from the scene with Thanh in Book IV and engineer a situation in which obeying Malack's commands requires Belkar to harm Mr. Scruffy, and hope that's sufficiently contrary to Belkar's nature that it throws off the spell (and makes him really mad at Malack). Any way of doing that besides using Mr. Scruffy as a shield (which stands a high chance of making Belkar furious with Durkon rather than with Malack) currently escapes me, though. Unless the cat's smart enough to deliberately interpose himself (or, alternately, just gets in the way accidentally).

    Other ideas?
    Take notes from when Belkar fought Tsukiko (granted, Durkon wasn't there) and fling an angry cat into an enemy caster's face. Should buy him time to get himself good and lost in the maze at least (maybe he'll find V rather than vice-versa? /running gag).

    Problem with that is what to do about Belkar.

    In any case, guaranteed that it'll re-occur to Scruffy that he should be super ticked at the vampire any moment now.
    SSBitP
    Quote Originally Posted by Craft (Cheese) View Post
    "Creativity is the art of knowing how to hide one's sources." - Original quote, DO NOT STEAL.

  9. - Top - End - #249
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    GreenSorcererElf

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The MunchKING View Post

    Obviously his name was Kcalam.

    This has been your random Diskworld reference for the day.


    Spoiler
    Show
    EDIT: Actually that's what they do when they try to TRICK people in the Disc. DANG IT! Foiled by my own attention to detail!
    It's a reference to Dracula by Bram Stoker. When Dracula goes to London, he books his tickets and rents his property under the pseudonym of Alucard. Pratchett was making a reference to that.
    'F' is the fire that rains from the Sky
    'U' for Uranium, BOMB!
    'N' is for No Survivors...

  10. - Top - End - #250
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Actually, the Alucard alias doesn't come from Bram Stoker's novel; the count travels under his own name and generally gets away with it (since nobody knows that he's a vampire for quite some time - well over half the book passes before his true nature is revealed to the characters). "Alucard" was invented by later adaptations, generally ones that took the count being outed as a vampire for granted, and use the alias to preserve some mystery.

    The more general application of vampires spelling their names backwards is most often put forward by Terry Pratchett (there's certainly no evidence of it in earlier vampire works like Carmilla or Nosferatu). Not that it's a bad thing, mind.

  11. - Top - End - #251
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    I'm having trouble parsing Malack's sentence in panel 9 on the right-hand side. Or it may be that I just don't know the effects of "vampiric gaze".

    edit: I also haven't finished reading this entire thread yet.
    Last edited by enh; 2013-02-28 at 11:14 PM.

  12. - Top - End - #252
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Feb 2013

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    'Harm'ing himself.. called it..

  13. - Top - End - #253
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    ...Who needs a nemesis?

    Did no one else think that after seeing the title?

    And great comic as always Giant.
    Last edited by ICN; 2013-02-28 at 11:20 PM.

  14. - Top - End - #254
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by enh View Post
    I'm having trouble parsing Malack's sentence in panel 9 on the right-hand side. Or it may be that I just don't know the effects of "vampiric gaze".

    edit: I also haven't finished reading this entire thread yet.
    Took me a couple tries, too. The vampiric gaze is making Belkar attack Durkon. Durkon has just spent (used up) three spells in response to that fact. Therefore:

    "Your three spells (have been) spent (in response) to my vampiric gaze."

    Hope that helps.

  15. - Top - End - #255
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Deepbluediver View Post
    Does this comic give anyone else bad vibes? Durkon in that second-to-last panel seems to be exuding an aura of "I'm only 1 day away from retirement" or something similar.

    Maybe it's just me.
    No, the possibility is definitely being set up that Durkon will not survive this fight. Doesn't mean that's actually what's going to happen, of course.

  16. - Top - End - #256
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay R View Post
    Took me a couple tries, too. The vampiric gaze is making Belkar attack Durkon. Durkon has just spent (used up) three spells in response to that fact. Therefore:

    "Your three spells (have been) spent (in response) to my vampiric gaze."

    Hope that helps.
    Ah, yes it does. Many thanks!

  17. - Top - End - #257
    Troll in the Playground
     
    DwarfClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    I'm confused. I thought that if Malack was Resurrected, he'd keep his memories? Anyway, could he get V to Limited Wish Malack's memories onto a Resurrected Malack?

    On another note, I don't see why they could've just agreed to only cast healing/support or not cast at all, so Durkon could say "oh yeah I'm preventing harm to my party by doing this so it's all good"? CONFUSED!

  18. - Top - End - #258
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2010

    Thumbs up Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Another awesome comic. Durkon is pretty much my favorite OOTS character, because he behaves like we'd all like to in a table-top game. Lawful Good, Cleric, racially appropriate. And, in Rich's comic, a straight-man.

    I wish I had the luxury of going through the old strips to show where Durkon is the voice of reason (tree-attacking excepted). Even Roy isn't always reliable as Lawful-Good, since he fudged stuff during the hotel siege where he changed genders. Durkon? Salt-of-the-earth.

    If Rich had run this character at my table I'd be heaping up XP for his RP skills.

    Now he's facing a vampire cleric, possibly a level or two higher. It's all strategy from now on, and I for one hope that Rich gives us a realistic table-top battle.

    Question: Has Durkon ever broken the Fourth Wall in these strips? If he has, it's been far rarer than the other characters.

    Loving the comic. Can't wait for the next strip. The Giant has some devious stuff in store for us, by my guess.

  19. - Top - End - #259
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    rewinn's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Ok I got it! What is the only melee weapon we've seen injure Malack?

    Durkon will cast Disrupting Weapon on Belkar's head then smack Malack around with it! (Since Belkar weighs 30 pounds, he'll probably have to use Thor's Might to wield him )

    There's probably a penalty for using a halfing as an improvised weapon, but a 30-pound hammer should do a lot of crushing damage!
    Last edited by rewinn; 2013-03-01 at 12:22 AM.

  20. - Top - End - #260
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    sabelo2000's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    ZOMG three comics in as many days... I am in a squee overload! Thank you, Giant!
    Intelligence is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put a tomato in a fruit salad.

    Outlandish Claim #5:
    Quote Originally Posted by Arbane View Post
    Belkar Bitterleaf isn't "playing against type", he's just a complelely normal halfling.
    No plan survives first contact with the PCs.

  21. - Top - End - #261
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Starbuck_II's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by JackRackham View Post
    Damn, so much for being 1 low-level spell away from melee support. The Giant juked me again.
    You mean Junkos you?
    (joke based on Doppa Rangan LP)

    Which spell: Protection from evil/Good?

  22. - Top - End - #262
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by r2d2go View Post
    I'm confused. I thought that if Malack was Resurrected, he'd keep his memories? Anyway, could he get V to Limited Wish Malack's memories onto a Resurrected Malack?
    I don't think that memories are the issue; rather, Malack perhaps justifiably feels that being brought back as a living creature would fundamentally alter his outlook and experience of the world - he may have continuity of experience, but he certainly wouldn't continue to be the same person. Malack is clearly happy being a vampire (he's had a couple of centuries to de-vampify himself, after all) and is most likely insulted by Durkon's belief that he can be cured by a simple dust-then-rez procedure - I doubt Malack feels that he needs to be "cured" of anything.

  23. - Top - End - #263
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Gift Jeraff View Post
    Hey, since Haley calls Durkon "D," does that mean we can now call him Vampire Hunter D?
    Not Scruffy the Vampire Slayer?

  24. - Top - End - #264
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    SaintRidley's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The land of corn
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Gurgeh View Post
    I don't think that memories are the issue; rather, Malack perhaps justifiably feels that being brought back as a living creature would fundamentally alter his outlook and experience of the world - he may have continuity of experience, but he certainly wouldn't continue to be the same person. Malack is clearly happy being a vampire (he's had a couple of centuries to de-vampify himself, after all) and is most likely insulted by Durkon's belief that he can be cured by a simple dust-then-rez procedure - I doubt Malack feels that he needs to be "cured" of anything.
    Also, from Malack's point of view, it's rather silly to resurrect him. He's a superior being, after all. He should be the one changing the fundamental makeup of inferior beings.
    Linguist and Invoker of Orcus of the Rudisplorker's Guild
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    Fantasy literature is ONLY worthwhile for what it can tell us about the real world; everything else is petty escapism.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    No author should have to take the time to say, "This little girl ISN'T evil, folks!" in order for the reader to understand that. It should be assumed that no first graders are irredeemably Evil unless the text tells you they are.

  25. - Top - End - #265
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by r2d2go View Post
    I'm confused. I thought that if Malack was Resurrected, he'd keep his memories? Anyway, could he get V to Limited Wish Malack's memories onto a Resurrected Malack?

    On another note, I don't see why they could've just agreed to only cast healing/support or not cast at all, so Durkon could say "oh yeah I'm preventing harm to my party by doing this so it's all good"? CONFUSED!
    Durkon wouldn't have agreed to anything. Like he says in the comic, there's no comprimise. Malack is an evil vampire, not his friend. He won't do anything that would hinder his party's chances of winning. That's sort of the definition of Lawful Good. Clerics aren't just heal bots. We just saw him in a devastating attack agains the Linear Guild with Stone Shape and Holy Word. Refusing to use any of his other class features would go against his entire belief system and be a complete betrayal of the friends he's known for years, just to stay on good terms with a blood sucking undead creature he just met, who is attacking what for all Malack knows is Durkon's friend.

    Malack threw the first two stones in this battle by aiding Tarquin in attacking the Order, and again in trying to turn Belkar into a vampire. He's not exactly in any position to demand comprimise.
    Last edited by NerdyKris; 2013-03-01 at 01:26 AM.

  26. - Top - End - #266
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2010

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Thanks Giant!
    To find in order to lose; To fall in order to stand up
    To freeze in order to ignite; To find myself within, and not fear the edge
    To die in order to be reborn to the new world

  27. - Top - End - #267
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    rodneyAnonymous's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    empty space

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Plants are not inanimate.
    Last edited by rodneyAnonymous; 2013-03-01 at 01:50 AM. Reason: trees -> plants
    I like semicolons; they make me feel smart.

  28. - Top - End - #268
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Once a Fool View Post
    Durkon is going to die. Very soon. It is heavily foreshadowed.

    The last frame calls our attention to this strip, which also has this gem of a conversation:
    Doubtful as the story is only about halfway through IIRC. I don't think a major character will die at this point and we already had a resurrection plot.

  29. - Top - End - #269
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    SaintRidley's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The land of corn
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rodneyAnonymous View Post
    Plants are not inanimate.
    They lack the capacity for motion, animation. Inanimate.

    Alternately, Hel is pointing out that our dwarf lost a fight with a dead tree. Mega-embarrassing and an attempt to make Thor ashamed to want her with him in Valhalla.
    Linguist and Invoker of Orcus of the Rudisplorker's Guild
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    Fantasy literature is ONLY worthwhile for what it can tell us about the real world; everything else is petty escapism.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    No author should have to take the time to say, "This little girl ISN'T evil, folks!" in order for the reader to understand that. It should be assumed that no first graders are irredeemably Evil unless the text tells you they are.

  30. - Top - End - #270
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread

    (Thor replies) My worthy servant Durkon,

    Vampiric Gaze can be used repeatedly at no cost, but so can Strongly Presented Holy Symbol continually keep a vampire at bay.

    Use your Heal skill & hammer to knock out the dominated Belkar before Hold Person conks out. Sling him over your shoulder, then march that vampire backwards through traps until you reach sunlight.

    Your deity,

    Thor

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •