Results 301 to 330 of 1493
-
2014-11-21, 02:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- In Hammer Space
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Avatar made by Bradakhan| Other avatars.
-
2014-11-21, 03:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Technically, can't someone cast Coalition Victory without actually fulfilling the win conditions? Or, can't someone respond with instant-speed removal to clear off a necessary component of the win condition? I'd expect that to still qualify as "resolves", just that "resolving" doesn't actually do anything under the circumstances.
-
2014-11-21, 05:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
There are actually quite a few "you win the game" effects in commander.
-
2014-11-21, 06:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
For example, there's the classic battle of wits flashed in using Vedalken Orrery on end step after someone board wipes your field of eldrazi that you cast off of Spawnsire of Ulamog, which get shuffled into your library.
-
2014-11-21, 06:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
I would give a standing ovation to someone who did that. Also I'm imagining they just pull out two spare deck boxes of artisan of kozilek and dump them on the table.
-
2014-11-21, 07:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
It's EDH, and it fits in any UG deck (I throw in G because it's otherwise unlikely you'll hit 20 mana unless you have serious artifact ramp). Sure, Battle of Wits is a dead card unless you get Spawnsire of Ulamog off, but that's only one card and it's worth it for the story. Vedalken orrery I'm just counting as a generally good card in UG.
-
2014-11-21, 08:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
I use braces (also known as "curly brackets") to indicate sarcasm. If there are none present, I probably believe what I am saying; should it turn out to be inaccurate trivia, please tell me rather than trying to play along with an apparent joke I don't know I'm making.
-
2014-11-21, 08:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Carlisle, Englund
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
"Three blokes walk into a pub. One of them is a little bit stupid, and the whole scene unfolds with a tedious inevitability." - Bill Bailey
Androgeus' 3 step guide to Doctor Who speculation:
Spoiler- Pick a random character
- State that person is The Rani
- goto 1
-
2014-11-21, 09:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
-
2014-11-21, 11:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
More obnoxious newbiedom!
I have two decks, cobbled together out of older cards I inherited, mostly based on thematic elements. I hesitate to call either "tribal" because there's very little real tribal synergy, but both seem to work decently in kitchen table games, not amazigood but reliably solid showings, so I'm happy with them. I recently got a program which lets me input decks and tweak them, and suddenly the sky's the limit. I want to keep the central idea, but ideally produce something that can stand up to other players with equal freedom of selection.
Kithkin
Spoiler3 Kithkin Rabble
4 Goldmeadow Harrier
4 Ballynock Cohort
1 Knight of Meadowgrain
4 Ęthertow
1 Sunblast Angel
1 Ballynock Trapper
3 Repel Intruders
1 Augury Adept
1 Pentarch Ward
2 Armored Ascension
2 Cerulean Wisps
1 Arctic Aven
1 Surge of Thoughtweft
2 Mistmeadow Skulk
1 Crusade
2 Fire at Will
1 Kinsbaile Balloonist
1 Righteousness
16 Plains
7 Island
1 Breakthrough
Concept: There's a number of cards here that are fantastic defenders throughout the game (Goldmeadow Harriers in particular), giving time for Kithkin Rabble to get out of control, but "Victory Condition" is often Mistmeadow Skulk with Armored Ascension. Or just overwhelm them with cheap, efficient aggro with cards like Ballynock Cohort and Knight of Meadowgrain. There's little removal, but good card draw, a low curve, and plenty of ways to keep up if the game goes long.
Expanding: Definitely four Mistmeadow Skulks, definitely four Armored Ascensions, definitely four Repel Intruders. Beyond that, I'm not as sure. There's a lot of good Kithkin cards out there, and I don't know most of them, and I have a tendency to want to grab 1+ of everything. Wizened Cenn, Brigid Hero of Kinsbaile, and Order of Whiteclay are all tempting. I just don't know how to balance it all out.
Cinders / Phyrexia
Spoiler2 Fists of the Demigod
1 Rage Reflection
1 Phyrexian Rager
4 Cinderbones
1 Phyrexian Scuta
1 Scar
2 Torrent of Souls
1 Eradicate
1 Sudden Spoiling
1 Flamekin Harbinger
1 Smokebraider
1 Keldon Mantle
1 Dusk Urchins
1 Takklemaggot
1 Rite of Consumption
1 Phyrexian Arena
2 Ashenmoor Gouger
1 Strafe
1 Slith Bloodletter
1 Gorgon Recluse
1 Terror
1 Spike Jester
1 Midnight Banshee
1 Blowfly Infestation
1 Serrated Arrows
1 Kulrath Knight
1 Phyrexian Reclamation
1 Cast into Darkness
1 Corrosive Mentor
3 Urborg Volcano
14 Swamp
8 Mountain
Concept: -1/-1 tokens, -1/-1 tokens everywhere. Blowfly Infestation + Serrated Arrows + Kulrath Knight is nasty, and Dusk Urchins synergize well too. Too bad I only have one of each. Rounding it out is a number of Phyrexian cards I found fun, a number of good R/B targets for Fists of the Demigod (Spike Jester, Ashenmoor Gouger), and... admittedly a fair amount of random filler, some of which could probably be improved out of my own selection.
Expanding: Four each of Blowfly Infestation, Serrated Arrows, Kulrath Knight, and Dusk Urchins. Cinderbones, of course. Not sure where to go from there though. What do I cut? Is there anything else I should be adding in? The continued use of Fists of the Demigod and its prime targets keeps the Cinder side strong, and rounds out the midgame - and let's face it, I'll need things with actual attack damage to win. Again, the problem is what to cut, and how to balance it all.
Bonus round
Spoiler- Are there any cards I have here that have any real value? I'm not particularly looking to sell, but I'm a little curious.
- What "Game Type" would I be looking at, with desks like these?Last edited by sonofzeal; 2014-11-21 at 11:05 PM.
-
2014-11-22, 12:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Location
- Middle of nowhere USA.
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
How many Wrath effects should a Tariel (WBR) EDh deck focused on boardsweeping have?
And sorry but card suggestions won't do me much good at present. Just went through every card I owned scrounging up enough 2nd and 3rd tier Wrath effects to make the deck work. Just need advice on the mix.
-
2014-11-22, 12:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Entirely depends on your playgroup. You need less if people tend to durdle as they build their armies, more if they're really aggressive about fast build ups. Balance wrath effects with powerful spot removal. Oh, and please include Crackling Doom, it's the best removal spell ever printed. Finally, the best way to make the deck run smoother is include draw effects. I realize mardu has the lowest amount of card draw effects, but there's some good stuff with black and then Chandra Pyromaster can provide some consistent effects.
-
2014-11-22, 11:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Rules question - Mistmeadow Skulk can't be targetted by Serrated Arrows, but if I used it on Goldmeadow Harrier while Blowfly Infestation is out, can I move the -1/-1 token to Skulk when Harrier dies?
Basically... what are the limits of "Protection from"?
(Also, I'm still curious what "Game Type" I should be listing as.)Last edited by sonofzeal; 2014-11-22 at 11:53 AM.
-
2014-11-22, 12:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
You can move it, protection cares about DEBT: Damage, Enchanting, Blocking, and Targeting. After Serrated Arrows is used on Harrier, the Harrier dies and the Infestation triggers, this Infestation counter is a completely separate entity, and it's not protected so it can target the Skulk and kill it.
Uncle Fong, from Bibliography, and Chibi Fong Avatar By Elagune
Total War Factions
Spoiler
Total War: Broken City (Retired)
Banner courtesy of Nyrt
Total War: Another 2125 (Retired)
Dutch Kritarchy and Constituents
-
2014-11-22, 12:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Denmark
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Last edited by Ninjaman; 2014-11-22 at 12:19 PM.
-
2014-11-22, 12:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Hence my question.
Mistmeadow Skulk has to be targetted to get the token, but it's not entirely clear to me whether it's Blowfly Infestation that's doing the targetting since it's neither being played nor using an active ability.
Official wording:
"Mistmeadow Skulk can't be blocked by creatures with converted mana cost 3 or greater. - Mistmeadow Skulk can't be enchanted by Auras with converted mana cost 3 or greater. It also can't be equipped by Equipment with converted mana cost 3 or greater. - Mistmeadow Skulk can't be targeted by spells with converted mana cost 3 or greater. It also can't be targeted by abilities from sources with converted mana cost 3 or greater. - All damage that would be dealt to Mistmeadow Skulk by sources with converted mana cost 3 or greater is prevented"Last edited by sonofzeal; 2014-11-22 at 12:28 PM.
-
2014-11-22, 12:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
ithilanor on Steam.
-
2014-11-22, 03:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Carlisle, Englund
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Last edited by Androgeus; 2014-11-22 at 03:39 PM.
"Three blokes walk into a pub. One of them is a little bit stupid, and the whole scene unfolds with a tedious inevitability." - Bill Bailey
Androgeus' 3 step guide to Doctor Who speculation:
Spoiler- Pick a random character
- State that person is The Rani
- goto 1
-
2014-11-22, 04:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Another rules question.
I have Brigid, Hero of Kinsbaile, boosted to 3/4. My opponent declares three attackers - a 1/1, a 2/2, and a 2/3 Deathtouch. I assign Brigid to block his 2/3 Deathtouch, since she's got enough to kill it.
During the Damage step, before Brigid's First Strike resolves, he cast Boros Charm to make his creatures indestructable. While that's still on the stack, can I tap Brigid to deal two damage to all his creatures and kill the 1/1 and 2/2 before Boros Charm resolves and makes them invulnerable?
Stack rules say any ability I play as a response to Boros Charm resolves first, and I'm 99% sure you can use tap abilities at "instant" speed unless stated otherwise. And Brigid is currently untapped, because you don't have to tap to block. We both agree it still feels kinda wrong though.
Does it work?
-
2014-11-22, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Yes, you can freely tap Brigid to use its ability once blockers have been declared, and doing so in response to the Boros Charm will destroy the 1/1 and 2/2. Note that this would be happening in the Declare Blockers step; at the beginning of the step, blockers are declared by the defending player (which doesn't use the stack), then the active player receives priority and both players need to pass priority on an empty stack before moving into the damage step(s).
ithilanor on Steam.
-
2014-11-22, 04:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
-
2014-11-22, 04:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Greece
- Gender
-
2014-11-23, 12:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Needing at minimal a 3/5 to deal with a single 4 drop has so many things wrong with it. Once blockers are declared though and it moves into the realm of hey, my first strike kills your creature, Boros Charm should be able to be played and stop the creature from dying, at which point it's **** that you can tap it deal 2 damage to everything..
DnD Me
SpoilerNeutral Evil Human Sorcerer/Rogue (1st/1st Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength-13
Dexterity-12
Constitution-12
Intelligence-15
Wisdom-11
Charisma-13
-
2014-11-23, 12:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Given that it's a legendary creature that dies as easily as any other creature to removal and cannot activate it's tap ability the turn it comes into play, it seems reasonable if pushed. Oh, and 3 toughness means a lightning bolt kills it. 1 mana instant for a 4 mana creature is not a good trade for you.
-
2014-11-23, 01:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Brigid is the kind of a creature that's rough to fight in combat. Thing is, magic is so much more than the combat step. There are ways to go over the top (Tarmogoyf is often a 2-mana 6/7 for instance), but more commonly you have creatures that ignore it (flying, shadow, protection from white, the sort) or simply removal. And some decks can just swarm it by getting a number of X/3s out and just swinging for the fences; one might die but the rest still connect. Finally, it's fully possible to win without using the combat step at all (currently, card draw plus 4xMaster the Way is a fairly easy Standard-legal way of simply burning someone out in a control shell, for instance, especially when coupled with other burn spells that double as removal).
Granted, against token-based strategies are where Brigid is at its strongest.Things Brigid does not do though: It does not kill the opponent very quickly. It does not affect the board the turn you play it (you need to get to untap with it to use its ability). It does not have Vigilance, so it can't attack while using its ability. Likewise, it can't both use it offensively and defensively on the same turn (since you have to tap it one round or the other). Overall, it's a fairly powerful board control effect but plagued by frailty, slowness and the lack of offensive contributions. It's at its best against limited-style decks full of small-medium sized creatures and few synergies or removal spells and a low quantity of things that can go over the top.Last edited by Eldariel; 2014-11-23 at 01:15 AM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2014-11-23, 01:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Yes and it was running against a real life copy of a Boros deck which would hopefully in a perfect world have better ways of dealing with it, but as a real life deck,, it really doesn't, so the ability to totally nullify any aggro rush is viewed as *********
DnD Me
SpoilerNeutral Evil Human Sorcerer/Rogue (1st/1st Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength-13
Dexterity-12
Constitution-12
Intelligence-15
Wisdom-11
Charisma-13
-
2014-11-23, 01:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
I don't really get what you're upset over. Indeed, why would it be undesirable for the game to contain cards good against a specific subset of cards when the deck doesn't draw its removal spells? Sometimes that happens; sometimes everyone loses and it isn't much of a game because one draws the wrong cards or because one draws too few lands or whatever. Yes, sometimes a single card can trump your whole strategy (but that's simple enough to counteract; few miser's copies of some bigger flyers for instance to go over the top, or more removal, or whatever to give you live draws) and you don't draw your answers. I can only imagine e.g. Ensnaring Bridge (with a deck built to keep its hand empty while burning you out) or Teferi's Moat or some such would also be extremely problematic but so what?
There are plenty of white/red cards that can destroy any type of a permanent and there are cards that ignore any given thing trying to stop you from winning. Hell, a boros deck with a bunch of Lightning Bolts, Lightning Strikes and Stoke the Flames, for example, would have a very good chance of drawing something to remove the Brigid and keep on attacking like it weren't there.
It's all a part of the game. Sometimes enemy has trumps to your strategy and you lose to that. Other games enemy has the trump but you have a way to deal with it and keep at it like it weren't there. And other times the enemy never sees their trump, no matter how brutal it is. Sometimes you have the trump instead and you get an effortless win. If you wish to reduce the likelihood of losing to trumps, add few more spells capable of dealing with enemy permanents. You're in excellent colors for them and some of the options are hardly pricey to buy as singles.
E.g. white has very versatile answers like Oblivion Ring or Banishing Light and red has thousands of different burn spells (which also help with killing the opponent after your beatdown has gotten them low); if answers form a significant portion of your deck (say, 10-12 out of 60 cards), chances of you losing to any specific card that trumps your strategy are fairly slim. Of course, it's a trade-off but if you like to always have live draws until you die, having at least one miser's copy of an "answer anything"-card is a nice way to go about it. This is all a part of what makes Magic such an awesome game in the first place.Last edited by Eldariel; 2014-11-23 at 01:57 AM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2014-11-23, 10:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Pursuant to my post back here, since I didn't get any responses, I tried my own attempts.
Kith and Kin
Spoiler17 Plains
6 Island
4 Goldmeadow Harrier
4 Mistmeadow Skulk
4 Knight of Meadowgrain
3 Wizened Cenn
4 Ballynock Cohort
1 Order of Whiteclay
3 Kithkin Rabble
1 Brigid, Hero of Kinsbaile
3 Cerulean Wisps
3 Ęthertow
3 Repel Intruders
4 Armored Ascension
Pure tribal. Not a single card (besides lands) that doesn't show Kithkin in the picture. Still tweaking it though. Cerulean Wisps in particular is a cantrip, and nice with Harrier and Brigid, but often sits in the hand or tossed just for the card draw. Surge of Thoughtweft has less potential but might be a bit more reliable as a cantrip, but I'm not convinced, and I need blue for Repel Intruders anyway. And I'd like more Rabble, Aethertow, and Repel Intruders, but the 4 mana point is pretty clogged.
Any help?
Tainted Cinders
Spoiler8 Mountain
16 Swamp
4 Manaforge Cinder
4 Cinderbones
4 Spike Jester
4 Ashenmoor Gouger
4 Ashenmoor Liege
4 Kulrath Knight
4 Fists of the Demigod
4 Blowfly Infestation
4 Serrated Arrows
Great curve. Haven't playtested this one nearly as much though. I miss the Dusk Urchins and Phyrexian Arena though. Did I go too far in pruning down? Is there still enough here to be viable?
Also, still wondering what's up with "Game Type".
-
2014-11-23, 10:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Carlisle, Englund
- Gender
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Probably to help you sort between decks for different formats, i.e. standard, modern, commander ect.
So I've been getting a bit bored with my EDH decks recently. Currently I have Norin The Wary, Gwafa, Intent, Neskuar and Ruahn. Not really sure what I want to try build next. Anyone got any suggestions?"Three blokes walk into a pub. One of them is a little bit stupid, and the whole scene unfolds with a tedious inevitability." - Bill Bailey
Androgeus' 3 step guide to Doctor Who speculation:
Spoiler- Pick a random character
- State that person is The Rani
- goto 1
-
2014-11-23, 10:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
Re: Magic the Gathering XX: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!
Former Owner of GiTP's fanciest Bloodbowl Team: The Fancy Lads
The League's Self-Proclaimed Perennial Favorites and Season III Champions!
Current Owner and Manager of Rampant Professionalism