Results 151 to 180 of 188
-
2014-11-08, 01:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Please use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 01:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
I don't really see that. The fluff seems to be saying you've learned a lot of stuff from going a lot of places, but you never stick around too long. They gain a connection, but they "take their terrain mastery wherever they go". That and it does kinda explicitly say they retain abilities regardless of the terrain they're on. "For example, a horizon walker who selected desert terrain mastery is immune to fatigue even if she's underground, in the mountains, or in a city". I'd be kinda miffed if I was told that I couldn't use those abilities off their respective terrains, just 'cause it doesn't seem like there's a reason for it to me.
Last edited by Thiyr; 2014-11-08 at 01:16 AM. Reason: changing punctuation for clarity
The Complete Warrior rules on losing prerequisites for a PrC apply to all books. This bothers me enough to sig it. If you disagree, please PM me, I'm down with being proven wrong.
Steam: Thiyr (The Great and Powerful Bulbasaur).
SC2: RianL.377. Hit me up for some SC2 if you're on.
Bulbabulbabulbabulba...SAUR.
-
2014-11-08, 01:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Yeah, Thiyr is right, it doesn't get much clearer than this:
Originally Posted by horizon walker
There is no RAW justification whatsoever for robbing horizon walker of his class features if he's not in that terrain type. It's already a pretty weak class, there's no reason to take away the one thing that makes it vaguely worthwhile.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2014-11-08, 01:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
(I never said there was a RAW justification)
The fluff justification I refer to is as follows:
You instinctively anticipate shifts in the reality of the plane that bring you closer to your destinationPlease use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 01:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Calgary, AB
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
-
2014-11-08, 02:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- The Great PNW
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Author of The Auspician's Handbook and The Tempestarian's Handbook for Spheres of Power.Greenman by Bradakhan/Spring Greenman by Comissar/Autumn Greenman by Sgt. Pepper/Winter Greenman by gurgleflep
Ask me (or the other authors) anything.
-
2014-11-08, 02:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2014-11-08, 02:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Calgary, AB
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
-
2014-11-08, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Sweden
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Another PRC concept that seems kind of silly to me: all those full divine caster progression classes that essentially comes down to being "the chosen uber high priest best buddy of <diety>". There is already a class like that, it's called cleric! You're channeling the power of your god, it doesn't get much more chosen than that!
Ofcourse, from a power point of view those PRCs are awesome because cleric is pretty dull beyond first level, and I'd obviously rather have full casting AND additional powers, but from a fluff perspective it just seems pretty silly. Having your god on speed-dial for divine intervention isn't enough to mark you as special in the church? Being a servant of Pelor isn't enough, you have to be a radiant one? Domains are suppose to reflect what kind of diety you follow; stacking on a PRC on top of that is just... well, awesome for the power, but it seems like pretty weak concepts to me.
-
2014-11-08, 09:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Or if you're not a fan of the quantum angle, it could be that you're sensing shifts in the plane of shadow or limbo, and then using those shifts as a means to propel yourself through whatever plane you're on? At that point you're basically just doing a normal dimension door, going off-plane just long enough to get to where you want to be, riding the planar wave.
Which kinda makes me want to make an over-the-top surfer horizon-walker. Constantly searching for the Ultimate Wave.
also
I can kinda see it as a "you're set apart from the rest" bit. Clerics are more the standard magically imbued dudes, low-rung followers. Anyone can become a cleric if they have enough faith. Your RSoPs are the ones who go above and beyond, though. To use a non-religious comparison (because otherwise I'm getting into real-world stuff), anyone can become a computer techie, take a few classes and spend a few bucks and you can get some low level certificates, know your way around computers. But if you meet someone with, say, a CCAr certification? They're at the -top-, basically the best at what they do. Within their realm, they can do anything a low level techie can do and then some.
At least, that's how I'd see it. It depend on how the clergy is structured in your setting, though.Last edited by Thiyr; 2014-11-08 at 09:34 AM.
The Complete Warrior rules on losing prerequisites for a PrC apply to all books. This bothers me enough to sig it. If you disagree, please PM me, I'm down with being proven wrong.
Steam: Thiyr (The Great and Powerful Bulbasaur).
SC2: RianL.377. Hit me up for some SC2 if you're on.
Bulbabulbabulbabulba...SAUR.
-
2014-11-08, 09:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Gender
-
2014-11-08, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- 'Sconsin
-
2014-11-08, 12:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
I personally thought a lot of the cleric prestige classes were not indicating that the cleric was closer to the god, but rather specialized priestly training to reflect the god. After all, clerics of a chaotic evil war diety should not be similar in training to those of a peaceful lawful good healing deity.
For all of your completely and utterly honest needs. Zaydos made, Tiefling approved.
-
2014-11-08, 02:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
I know, I was enjoying the thread much more before it became pages of debating the definition of fluff vs. crunch; and "Mindrape: evil or just misunderstood?".
For my 2 cents, one of the most annoying things is how many PrCs dedicated to giving melee types magical or pseudo magical powers (particularly classes about imbuing your weapon with powers) are medium BAB. I know full BAB isn't the be all and end all, but it kind of is a thing for melee types. Elemental Warrior, Dragon Samurai and Shadowblade all come to mind as offenders.
Oh, and another of my major PrC gripes: there is (AFAIK) no Undead-slaying PrC that doesn't require Turn Undead. Oh, you wanted to play a Fighter or Ranger who really hates undead and has a PrC to back it up? Sorry, you need a Cleric dip - in fact, why not just play a Cleric or Paladin instead? Seriously - we have dedicated PrCs for slaying pretty much every other creature type that don't rely on a specific class feature; since Undead are one of the classic fantasy stereotypes for someone to dedicate their career to fighting, why no love for simple melee types? Sure, you can pick up feats and gear designed specifically for battling undead, but the lack of a PrC that didn't require Turning (and often spells as well) constantly irritates me. I keep meaning to homebrew one myself...My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2014-11-08, 02:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Please use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 03:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Tharggy, on Tellene
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
This. Ive always wanted to play a Hunter of the Dead, but i need to be a friggin paladin to do it. Seriously, its even a D8 HD PrC, which screams Ranger to me (or Fighter, cuz ill totally drop a HD to get a handful of spells.) and it has its own spells so no Cleric entry. Seriously am i supposed to get in as a Cleric 1/Full BaB class 5? So i need to wait till level 7 in order to be good at wrecking undead. Good job there guys.
-
2014-11-08, 03:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Dare I ask how many classes require dipping into one of the Master Classes to fight undead?
For all of your completely and utterly honest needs. Zaydos made, Tiefling approved.
-
2014-11-08, 03:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Tharggy, on Tellene
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
-
2014-11-08, 03:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Please use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Tharggy, on Tellene
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Honestly, if any of my players actually wanted to play an Undead murdering machine, id wave the Turn prereq for Hunter of the Dead as that Knowledge pre req seems good enough.
-
2014-11-08, 03:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
So only 2? Still bad, but I thought it was much more pervasive.
And I quite like the fix that ranks in the skill used to identify them can be used in place of Turn Undead to identify them.For all of your completely and utterly honest needs. Zaydos made, Tiefling approved.
-
2014-11-08, 04:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Tharggy, on Tellene
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
-
2014-11-08, 04:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Those were just the two I knew off the top of my head; there are a number of others. Of note, however, is Sacred Exorcist, since they're sort of anti-undead in the sense that they hate possessing entities, many of which are undead. That class grants TU, but requires casting so it's a moot point anyways.
Please use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 04:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
A cleric dip isn't the end of the world - just trade out the domains for devotion feats. Travel Devotion is great, as is Knowledge Devotion. You can even dip Cloistered Cleric to keep your skills up on a skillmonkey or knowledgemonkey, and getting Know Religion as a class skill is helpful for classes like Rogue.
Skullclan Hunter is another anti-undead class that needs TU but for the reasons mentioned above it is a worthwhile trade. It has 6+Int skills, advances sneak attack, allows you to track and sneak attack any undead, and grants a boatload of very handy immunities.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2014-11-08, 04:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
I'm not saying from a mechanical standpoint that a Cleric dip is a bad thing...but from a fluff POV, I think it's pretty sad that you need to dip to enter an Undead hunting PrC. Hellreaver is a great example of how to make a class like this with Fighter, Barbarians, Rangers etc. in mind.
I think there may be at least one more PrC than already mentioned that requires TU, but I can't find it at the moment.Last edited by Thurbane; 2014-11-08 at 04:46 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2014-11-08, 05:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
There are several others, most of them tailored towards Clerics (either because they're the spellcasters most suited towards the task or because they're flavored as servants of one god or the other). Some of the undead-hunter type classes that don't require TU are the Deadgrim (Magic of Eberron), which requires either TU or Favored Enemy (Undead) so at least a Ranger can get in and Knight of the Raven (Expedition to Castle Ravenloft) that only requires divine spells. The Fighter is still out of luck though...
However Deities and Demigods has the Soldier of Light class which doesn't require any of that, so our Fighter can actually enter it - to get the spells and TU he was missing to enter the other classes ;)
-
2014-11-08, 05:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Tharggy, on Tellene
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
And it doesnt suck, who woulda thunk it? Joking aside it actually is pretty good, spells, fast healing, some of the best paladin features, low entry requirements. I think im gonna make a Soldier of Light next time i wanna make a Vampire Hunter, and he shall be a Fighter.
-
2014-11-08, 06:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
So while complaining about classes that require TU, everyone is forgetting that Paladin gets it at 4th? AND has a couple ways to get rid of the casting if you want it?
-
2014-11-08, 06:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
Last edited by Extra Anchovies; 2014-11-08 at 06:46 PM.
Please use they/them/theirs when referring to me in the third person.
My Homebrew (PF, 3.5)
Awesome Bone Knight avatar by Chd.
Spoiler: Current Characters
-
2014-11-08, 06:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: What is the lamest prestige class concept (to you)
The very post that brought this issue up basically did mention it.
If you got rid of the spells AND the Code of Conduct a Paladin could be a form of alternative for the simple Fighter (though it still brings up the issue of "why can't I become an undead slayer, but can be a specialized hunter of X, Y and Z types of creatures") though that still locks out Rangers (even those built for fighting undead) out of a large part of those classes.