New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 26 of 26
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    donkyhotay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    Default is wanda booped?

    Wanda promised stanley that jillian wouldn't attack but she still did. Admittedly the battle against the dwagons isn't over and jillian may change the way the battle ends that justifies wandas trust but, seems to me stanley is going to be pretty upset with wanda (maybe even more then he's upset with hamster) since wanda promised jillian wouldn't attack.
    Do not be afraid to joust a giant just because some people insist on believing in windmills.
    FOSS Moonbase Commander remake @ http://code.google.com/p/tether

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Troll in the Playground
     
    WhiteWizardGirl

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by donkyhotay View Post
    Wanda promised stanley that jillian wouldn't attack but she still did. Admittedly the battle against the dwagons isn't over and jillian may change the way the battle ends that justifies wandas trust but, seems to me stanley is going to be pretty upset with wanda (maybe even more then he's upset with hamster) since wanda promised jillian wouldn't attack.
    Well it her, parson or ansom. and i doubt the last two are going down.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    boomwolf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In your head.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    two options here:

    1-wonda gonna get croacked by stanly and dwagens get croacked by jillian.

    2-jillian will attack the archons, making stanly forgive wanda for the few dead dwagons.


    Quote Originally Posted by Cormag81 View Post
    2117: No matter how good a debater I am out of character there is no way to logically get out of falling after your paladin kills his patron god.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Lamech's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Wanda's to valuable to croak she's the one who summoned Parson. (Which made GK quite a bit of money if nothing else.) Also Wanda created all those uncroaked. Stanley will need her to do that again if GK and his army is lost. So Wanda isn't going to croak.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Magnificent Boop in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by donkyhotay View Post
    Wanda promised stanley that jillian wouldn't attack but she still did. Admittedly the battle against the dwagons isn't over and jillian may change the way the battle ends that justifies wandas trust but, seems to me stanley is going to be pretty upset with wanda (maybe even more then he's upset with hamster) since wanda promised jillian wouldn't attack.
    Yep. Stanley has a temper, but not quite (so far as we've seen) to the Darth Vader point of killing off subordinates for a single failure -- particularly not subordinates that he badly needs (Parson is his only live warlord, and probably one who has been more successful, even now, than the ones who were running operations during the decline of Stanley's holdings from 11 cities to one; Wanda is presumably his only source of uncroaked troops).
    Last edited by SteveMB; 2007-08-31 at 03:00 PM.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    HalflingPirate

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    It also depends on what he gets in return for sacrificing 6+ (all we've seen croaked) dwagons. I'm sure netting the Arkenpliers would go a long way to cooling him down, even if the whole lake hex was lost.
    Something witty this place goes...

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by Halfpunch View Post
    It also depends on what he gets in return for sacrificing 6+ (all we've seen croaked) dwagons. I'm sure netting the Arkenpliers would go a long way to cooling him down, even if the whole lake hex was lost.
    Yes but how to get it to him...hmm...or rather how to save Wanda's cute little boop...lesse...

    Spoiler
    Show

    1. Jillian is attacking the healthy dwagon-fort dwagons -- unlikely given the "let me at the walord" comment.

    2. It's all a dream. Jillian is in fantasy fantasy land after thinkagraming Ansom. -- cliched but it might work

    3. Jillian freezes before she can act perhaps with a gentle reminder from Wanda -- possible but who knows?

    4. Ansom doesn't believe Jillian so he comes to the battle and oh no's Ansom don'ts get in the way! Benchmark! -- don't like it.

    5. Jillian croaks the dwagons but then defects to Stanley's side -- interesting and even exchange.

    6. Jillian croaks the dwagons but then defects to Stanley's side after stealing the Arkenpliers from Ansom -- she does not seem the thieving type though

    7. Jillian croaks the dwagons and return triumphantly to an all too happy Ansom but he still can't get any action from her . Meanwhile, dysfunctional intepersonal dynamics abound in the Gobwin Knob control room but in the end we're all still family. End of arc. Part II continues the story.

    Of all these, I say 3, 5 and 7 are the most likely. But I think I favor 2 cause it's just so crazy it's bound to work!

    And of course, the answer could be D. None of the above.
    Last edited by ag30476; 2007-08-31 at 05:05 PM.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    benthehater's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Well, if you're going to look at the literary elements (boop you in the boop ag30476, if that's your real name) to try to get a handle on what will happen to the very attractive (yet not all that sympathetic) Wanda Firebaugh there's reason to suspect that ...

    Spoiler
    Show
    We had a panel transition from sobbing pathetic Jillian to super confident Jillian, and specifically, we weren't informed of what happened during this interim of time. And as we've kinda went over before, we weren't given a lot of clues this time, though I'm sure they are there and that we've been set up so well by the accellerated story that we can't recognise them at this point. But I think we're genuinely supposed to wonder about what happened in that space of time between sobby Jillian and strong Jillian to allow Jillian to make the transition.


    And futhermore...

    Spoiler
    Show
    More important than precisely which hex of Dwagons she's attacking with the Archons, to understand who she's acting in the favor of we need to speculate instead on what allowed her to make the change from weak Jillian to strong Jillian. The impression the Ansom team seems to go with is that the Archons have broken the spell on her, and that not being under Wanda's spell has allowed Jillian to regain her confidence, express her exclusive affection for Ansom, and find the inner strength of true love to battle her enemies. Contrarywise, and I actually don't know if I believe this, but it is fun to speculate (booping boop) is the idea that in that unrevealed time period that contained the transition of Jillian from weak to strong, she contacted Wanda before she contacted Ansom. Encouraging words from Wanda could even be as simple as, "Darling, you need to be strong right now and stop crying. Pull yourself together. I think it's time you told Ansom how you feel about him. Okay? So you send him a nice note as soon as you're done, and then go attack this stack and do this so that whatever."


    But of course...

    Spoiler
    Show
    I can't get behind that one either. I like best that in the unrevealed time, Jillian didn't pick a side. That if she sent a thinkagram to Wanda too, that the thinkagram was also one way, and was also Jillian being honest about how she feels about Wanda, which would basically be more or less the same she feels about Ansom. Jillian can make an enemy or lover of who she chooses, and though she adores Wanda, she'll still act to crush Stanley since her hatred of him isn't mitigated in the least. Ultimately, that attitude for speculative purposes leaves us right back where we started. If Jillian is still acting in the basic interest of both Ansom and Wanda, then I do believe she could do any of the possible course of actions outlined. "Sorry Wanda, these Warlords and Dwagons have to go, I'll rescue you later after Gobwin Knob falls." even "Sorry Ansom, I've also got to protect the cheif Croakamancer on Stanley's side from Stanley, so we can't do too well in these battles until it's time for the final seige." or even "Sorry lovers, you have conflicting interests at stake here, so I'm going to act in my own interest exclusively until I can safely act in both your interests simultaneously."


    which of course leaves us with this problem...

    Spoiler
    Show
    It's really possible that this scenario might have been engineered by Rob to drive shippers crazy. That the more a person takes a personal interest in a particular pairing of Jillian will be finding more supporting evidence of that pairing in the subtext. Which also goes right back to ag30476's manipulation thread, which I guess holds more and more merit (I admit this with reluctance) the more I think about it. I'm basically caught in it too, though my preference is that I find Jillian more sympathetic than either of her lovers, so that I'd prefer her making choices in her best interest, and I'm holding to the idea that she's somehow either choosing to keep both of her lovers or neither of them. Maybe I'm just as blinded by my own personal investment into Jillian's character as anybody else is at this point.


    And hey, there's lots of possibilities here.

    Spoiler
    Show
    Juillian and Jacklyn start developing feelings for each other. Why not? Who says Archons can't also be sluts? But in all seriousness, I think just being talked through her situation, caught between her two lovers interest, could've been enough for Jillian to find confidence on her own. The character is in despair, basically crawling and aware of how pathetic that is, basically hitting bottom. An objective look at the situation with some objective help and encouraging words "I'm a competant and highly skilled warlord and I have the stats to prove it" can allow someone to come out of a depression funk, and best yet, come out of it with confidence. What really laid her low, I think, was the fact that people were accusing her of being a traitor, and that she kinda felt like she was a traitor, even though she wasn't actually betraying anybody. Her shameful situation was that she had a lover on both sides of the battle, and her remarks to Ansom reveal that she's decided not to let that bother her anymore. She's free to love who she chooses, and that's that. Freed from that guilt, she can have the courage to do whatever asskicking in whoever's interest she likes.


    and incidentally...

    Spoiler
    Show
    Vinnie, the master of objective assessments of all things Erfworld, has basically confirmed that Webinar is a jerk. So phhhhbt. Boop you Webinar, boop you in your booping boop, jerkface. The Woodsy Elves want you tried for warcrimes for keeping that Gump up your boop.
    might just play the wall with this mean look on my grill
    act like i'm the hater that hates you from hateville
    -
    Though I may not appear to be an actual hater, I assure you, my quiet hate for the stupid is very real, and I do have both authentic hater cred and a ballpeen hammer."

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Krelon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Europe, GMT+1

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    let's say Jillian croaks the A dwagons and all the warlorsd. Who is to take the blame?

    It was Parsons plan that was flawed, but Wanda summoned him in the first place. Wanda wanted to set Jillian free again and told the tool that she will be more valuable free than sitting in the dungeon. Wanda didn't inform Parson about available options (like veiling). Clearly Wanda is to take most of it.

    Wanda is really lucky though, cause Stanley just cannot disband or croak her... most of his units are uncroaked controlled by her, so she'll live.
    Orc Girl Avatar by Yeril !

    Irideen Yoannaell,woodelf ranger Into the Depths of the Earth (Dawnhorn) character sheet

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Singapore

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by Krelon View Post
    let's say Jillian croaks the A dwagons and all the warlorsd. Who is to take the blame?

    It was Parsons plan that was flawed, but Wanda summoned him in the first place.
    It wasn't really that Parson's plan was flawed--Wanda gave him a few things to work with, one of which was that she controlled Jillian's mind. It's not his fault she was wrong, no more than it would have been his fault if it turned out dragons sucked in combat and could be attacked by anyone even in heavy forest.

    Of course, Stanley might not see it that way, but there you have it.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    StickMan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Some how I just don't see Wanda dieing see as we are just seeing the start of this battle and she is quite powerful.
    [url=http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53501]



    50 Unconfirmed Rumors About 4th Ed!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    Well, if you're going to look at the literary elements (boop you in the boop ag30476, if that's your real name)
    It's the disease of the intellectual...but thank you for a most excellent and thought provoking post benthehater.

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    to try to get a handle on what will happen to the very attractive (yet not all that sympathetic) Wanda Firebaugh there's reason to suspect that ...

    Spoiler
    Show
    We had a panel transition from sobbing pathetic Jillian to super confident Jillian, and specifically, we weren't informed of what happened during this interim of time. And as we've kinda went over before, we weren't given a lot of clues this time, though I'm sure they are there and that we've been set up so well by the accellerated story that we can't recognise them at this point. But I think we're genuinely supposed to wonder about what happened in that space of time between sobby Jillian and strong Jillian to allow Jillian to make the transition.
    Agreed

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    And futhermore...

    Spoiler
    Show
    More important than precisely which hex of Dwagons she's attacking with the Archons, to understand who she's acting in the favor of we need to speculate instead on what allowed her to make the change from weak Jillian to strong Jillian. The impression the Ansom team seems to go with is that the Archons have broken the spell on her, and that not being under Wanda's spell has allowed Jillian to regain her confidence, express her exclusive affection for Ansom, and find the inner strength of true love to battle her enemies. Contrarywise, and I actually don't know if I believe this, but it is fun to speculate (booping boop) is the idea that in that unrevealed time period that contained the transition of Jillian from weak to strong, she contacted Wanda before she contacted Ansom. Encouraging words from Wanda could even be as simple as, "Darling, you need to be strong right now and stop crying. Pull yourself together. I think it's time you told Ansom how you feel about him. Okay? So you send him a nice note as soon as you're done, and then go attack this stack and do this so that whatever."
    A good possibility

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    But of course...

    Spoiler
    Show
    I can't get behind that one either. I like best that in the unrevealed time, Jillian didn't pick a side. That if she sent a thinkagram to Wanda too, that the thinkagram was also one way, and was also Jillian being honest about how she feels about Wanda, which would basically be more or less the same she feels about Ansom. Jillian can make an enemy or lover of who she chooses, and though she adores Wanda, she'll still act to crush Stanley since her hatred of him isn't mitigated in the least. Ultimately, that attitude for speculative purposes leaves us right back where we started. If Jillian is still acting in the basic interest of both Ansom and Wanda, then I do believe she could do any of the possible course of actions outlined. "Sorry Wanda, these Warlords and Dwagons have to go, I'll rescue you later after Gobwin Knob falls." even "Sorry Ansom, I've also got to protect the cheif Croakamancer on Stanley's side from Stanley, so we can't do too well in these battles until it's time for the final seige." or even "Sorry lovers, you have conflicting interests at stake here, so I'm going to act in my own interest exclusively until I can safely act in both your interests simultaneously."
    Free love is neither free nor love, discuss...

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    which of course leaves us with this problem...

    Spoiler
    Show
    It's really possible that this scenario might have been engineered by Rob to drive shippers crazy. That the more a person takes a personal interest in a particular pairing of Jillian will be finding more supporting evidence of that pairing in the subtext. Which also goes right back to ag30476's manipulation thread, which I guess holds more and more merit (I admit this with reluctance) the more I think about it. I'm basically caught in it too, though my preference is that I find Jillian more sympathetic than either of her lovers, so that I'd prefer her making choices in her best interest, and I'm holding to the idea that she's somehow either choosing to keep both of her lovers or neither of them. Maybe I'm just as blinded by my own personal investment into Jillian's character as anybody else is at this point.
    This game of expectation and manipulation between author and reader always goes on but with a web comic it becomes much more conscious because of the slow pacing of publishing and the accelerated nature of the comics form.

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    And hey, there's lots of possibilities here.

    Spoiler
    Show
    Juillian and Jacklyn start developing feelings for each other. Why not? Who says Archons can't also be sluts? But in all seriousness, I think just being talked through her situation, caught between her two lovers interest, could've been enough for Jillian to find confidence on her own. The character is in despair, basically crawling and aware of how pathetic that is, basically hitting bottom. An objective look at the situation with some objective help and encouraging words "I'm a competant and highly skilled warlord and I have the stats to prove it" can allow someone to come out of a depression funk, and best yet, come out of it with confidence. What really laid her low, I think, was the fact that people were accusing her of being a traitor, and that she kinda felt like she was a traitor, even though she wasn't actually betraying anybody. Her shameful situation was that she had a lover on both sides of the battle, and her remarks to Ansom reveal that she's decided not to let that bother her anymore. She's free to love who she chooses, and that's that. Freed from that guilt, she can have the courage to do whatever asskicking in whoever's interest she likes.
    I found Jillian's words ironic in that she is so bound up by love that she is/was practically immobile.

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    and incidentally...

    Spoiler
    Show
    Vinnie, the master of objective assessments of all things Erfworld, has basically confirmed that Webinar is a jerk. So phhhhbt. Boop you Webinar, boop you in your booping boop, jerkface. The Woodsy Elves want you tried for warcrimes for keeping that Gump up your boop.

    You know I think I'm one of the few readers who like that jerk.
    Last edited by ag30476; 2007-09-02 at 12:24 AM.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    benthehater's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by ag30476 View Post
    Free love is neither free nor love, discuss...
    Oh, I very much agree with that. For humans. But in a world where the people of the world don't cause procreation through intimacy, love isn't love either. It's biologically unnecessary for Erfworlders to engage in pair-bonding, so they don't have to. Likewise, no unit ever needs to "provide" for another, no screaming mouths to feed, and no need for the other half of a pair to take care of the screaming mouths. A city cares for it's units that it produces. Each produced unit has a purpose, and no unit ever has to struggle for a job. Though admittidly gender is also apparantly completely unecessary too, we still have it anyway.

    While Erfworld still resemble Earthworld, I still hold to the idea that since love is not a biological imperative, and that it serves no pragmatic purpose, that Jillian is genuinely free to make lovers or enemies of anyone she chooses, in ways that humans really arn't.
    might just play the wall with this mean look on my grill
    act like i'm the hater that hates you from hateville
    -
    Though I may not appear to be an actual hater, I assure you, my quiet hate for the stupid is very real, and I do have both authentic hater cred and a ballpeen hammer."

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by benthehater View Post
    While Erfworld still resemble Earthworld, I still hold to the idea that since love is not a biological imperative, and that it serves no pragmatic purpose, that Jillian is genuinely free to make lovers or enemies of anyone she chooses, in ways that humans really arn't.
    Except that when she loves two different people then she may be forced to make an impossible choice...

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Retired Mod in the Playground Retired Moderator
     
    kpenguin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Wanda is booping Stanley, presumably, so that might be a factor on whether she's booped.
    Visit the Chocolate Hammer IRC channel!
    (IRC Joining Guide Here!)

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    benthehater's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by ag30476 View Post
    Except that when she loves two different people then she may be forced to make an impossible choice...
    True. I think agonized helpless and pathetic Jillian was struggling with and impossible choice. And that the strong confident and proud Jillian (the one we got the jump cut to) somehow successfully made an impossible choice, and (in my own wishful thinking) chose both.

    The transition from a royal to a barbarian might possibly support this, though that's a stretch in my own mind. Jillian had a royal life, she lost that royal life, and had to take up a barbarian life, and found that she liked barbarian life much more than royal life. And though she could potentially, perhaps if Gobwin Knob is defeated, choose to resume royal life, I don't think that she would. You know, no, that doesn't support anything at all. Forget that.

    Instead, I'll posit that since her affection for Ansom is in spite of her dislike for his royalness (pomposity? arrogance? resemblence to how she used to life?) her feelings for him are emotionally anchored in spite of an intellectual sureness that it wouldn't work? Think she could convince him to become a barbarian instead of a prince? Think she wants to join him and become a princess again? (oh, it did support something, just not what I thought it did)

    But that also ties into the emotional freedom of Jillian anyway. If Jillian can't help her feelings for Ansom, is it really a choice? Was I going somewhere with this? Maybe?
    might just play the wall with this mean look on my grill
    act like i'm the hater that hates you from hateville
    -
    Though I may not appear to be an actual hater, I assure you, my quiet hate for the stupid is very real, and I do have both authentic hater cred and a ballpeen hammer."

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Kreistor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    K-W, Canada

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Well, I find Jillian's statement in 74 that she will see Ansom soon suggestive that she is not doing what we initially think she is. She loves Ansom and hates Stanley. If she is booping Stanley by killing the weakened dwagons, she isn't helping Ansom, who is still stuck in his trap.

    To see Ansom, she has to rescue him. To do that, she needs to shorten his distance to his own lines. To achieve that, she needs to smash one of the undamaged dwagon stacks, and leave the injured ones alone.

    So, my guess is that Jillian is not doing what Ansom wants her to: she is rescuing the man she loves. She kills dwagons, hurting Stanley, and takes Ansom out of the trap, hurting Stanley even more, but Parson gets a "bye" because the vulnerable dwagons come out unscathed. Parson gets to perform his anti-siege engine assault a second time, ending the immediate threat to the city, and buying the time he needs to learn the rules of the game.

    And Wanda gets off, because Jillian leaves the vulnerable dwagons alone, as promised.

    And the war would continue. Destroying the weakened dwagons or killing Ansom might end the story early.
    Last edited by Kreistor; 2007-09-05 at 11:07 AM.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kreistor View Post
    Well, I find Jillian's statement in 74 that she will see Ansom soon suggestive that she is not doing what we initially think she is. She loves Ansom and hates Stanley. If she is booping Stanley by killing the weakened dwagons, she isn't helping Ansom, who is still stuck in his trap.

    To see Ansom, she has to rescue him. To do that, she needs to shorten his distance to his own lines. To achieve that, she needs to smash one of the undamaged dwagon stacks, and leave the injured ones alone.

    So, my guess is that Jillian is not doing what Ansom wants her to: she is rescuing the man she loves. She kills dwagons, hurting Stanley, and takes Ansom out of the trap, hurting Stanley even more, but Parson gets a "bye" because the vulnerable dwagons come out unscathed. Parson gets to perform his anti-siege engine assault a second time, ending the immediate threat to the city, and buying the time he needs to learn the rules of the game.

    And Wanda gets off, because Jillian leaves the vulnerable dwagons alone, as promised.

    And the war would continue. Destroying the weakened dwagons or killing Ansom might end the story early.
    She was trying to rescue Ansom before she met the dwagons on the lake. The Archons even suggested just flying to Ansom without rationalization when she was "stuck", but she couldn't make that decision either. She seems to make up her mind in 74 as you say.

    Otherwise yes, the story is at an impasse. Killing the wounded dwagons and uncroaked warlords makes it very bad news for Stanley and Wanda story-wise and for Parson character-wise. Doing nothing to the wounded dwagons and uncroaked warlords makes it very bad news for the coalition and Ansom story-wise and for Jillian character-wise -- bad enough that the entire seige might fail evidently due to Jillian's betrayal.

    So how to fix this? That's the question. I would be all for your suggestion that she is trying to save Ansom. That would probably result in
    Spoiler
    Show
    Ansom sacrificing himself - something which I think will happen at some point in the story anyway
    That would be a good resolution to the impasse
    Spoiler
    Show
    Parson looses the wounded dwagons and the chance to eliminate the seige but Stanley gets Ansom and the arkenpliers


    But in 75 her command to the Archons implies she's going after the wounded dwagons because the warlords are with the wounded dwagons. And that's the major problem with this line of speculation.
    Last edited by ag30476; 2007-09-05 at 11:22 AM.
    Arena Initiate Referee

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    so, it seems that wanda was utterly wrong in the worst possible way.

    I hope she catches hell for this, her self-satisfaction is really starting to grind on my nerves.
    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    Blights are halted by the heroic, self-sacrificial actions of a couple of dudes. Throwing them into a land containing the ur-example of the modern pulp fantasy warrior is rather like tossing a sponge in the Pacific and wondering if it'll get wet.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Burrito's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Min-ee-soow-tah ya betcha
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Looks like now it is up to Parson to pull everyone's chestnuts out of the fire. Yeah, Wanda is boobed. Her stock with Stanley is in the Sub Prime Mortgage category.
    ...still keeping my jack boot on the neck of the little man...

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Julio Anejo View Post
    ...Your life isn't going to get any worse...

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    donkyhotay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    I think attacking the dwagons are somehow in wanda's best interest (at least in jillians mind). You notice how she says "whatever happens, one of your dolls is about to get broken" which to me hints that destroying the warlords isn't her goal right now but will happen as part of whatever it is she is trying to do.
    Do not be afraid to joust a giant just because some people insist on believing in windmills.
    FOSS Moonbase Commander remake @ http://code.google.com/p/tether

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Magnificent Boop in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Quote Originally Posted by Burrito View Post
    Yeah, Wanda is boobed.
    If ever there was a Freudian slip....

    Quote Originally Posted by donkyhotay View Post
    I think attacking the dwagons are somehow in wanda's best interest (at least in jillians mind). You notice how she says "whatever happens, one of your dolls is about to get broken" which to me hints that destroying the warlords isn't her goal right now but will happen as part of whatever it is she is trying to do.
    I think she was sardonically referring to the uncroaked warlords and herself (until just now) as Wanda's "dolls" (echoing Jaclyn's comparison earlier). Her jump was likely to end badly for either herself or her target.
    Last edited by SteveMB; 2007-09-06 at 10:28 PM. Reason: Added reply without double-post

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    You gotta admit this is going to setup one hella "You've been a bad girl" Wanda session.
    Arena Initiate Referee

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    OK so spoiler time

    Spoiler
    Show


    Before I was thinking Jillian betrays->Ansom sacrifices (captured)->siege units saved ->siege continues & Jillian atones in Part II

    But now, maybe Jillian betrays->Jillian atones by sacrifice (captured)->siege units saved ->siege & Jillian's extended sacrifice continues in Part II

    Last edited by ag30476; 2007-09-06 at 10:45 PM.
    Arena Initiate Referee

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    she'll just do whatever she did last time when she took her clothes off to calm him down.
    I would be a procrastinator, but I keep putting it off.

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    JazzManJim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006

    Default Re: is wanda booped?

    Unless things change drastically and her spell still has some real power, she will, at least, find herself on the chokey end of Erfworld's shortest leash.
    Last edited by JazzManJim; 2007-09-06 at 11:40 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •