Results 211 to 240 of 1474
-
2018-07-05, 07:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A101
You've got a couple of options:
1/2 of all non-initiator class levels count towards IL.
Thicket of Blades is a 3rd level Warblade stance, meaning you need IL 5.
So Monk 8/Warblade 1 could take the stance as the stance known for Warblade 1 (assuming you meet all the other reqs).
You could also get it with the Martial Stance feat, if you meet the reqs and have IL 5 (so Monk 10); you could take it as your 12th level feat.
Finally, there is the magic item option, usually as a Martial Script, which is a consumable item.
[edit] Ninja'd, while I was stuck on a phonecall :/ [/edit]Last edited by Thurbane; 2018-07-05 at 08:11 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2018-07-05, 07:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2018-07-05, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Can I have a citation for that? My understanding is that you can take any stance that you meet the reqs for?
Never mind, I answered my own question:
http://archive.wizards.com/default.a...060802a&page=2
Stances Known: You begin play with knowledge of one 1st-level stance from any discipline open to warblades.Last edited by Thurbane; 2018-07-05 at 08:11 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2018-07-05, 08:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2018-07-05, 11:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 100
Using either feat is independent from using the other. If you use Combat Expertise for -5/+5, you don't get the bonus from Stone Colossus. The reverse is also true.
However, nothing says you can't use both at one. So you could take -5 on Combat Expertise and -5 on Stone Colossus and gain a total of +10 AC
-
2018-07-06, 03:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 102
A question about items familiars:
Originally Posted by SRD
What happen then if you recover the original item that you believed were lost forever?
I doubt you can have two item familiars, so my guess is that forging the new link severed the previous one, making it lose its item familiar properties.
But it would still have its original magic, as well as any other improvements made to it by the same processus as other magical items...Last edited by St Fan; 2018-07-06 at 03:37 AM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2018-07-06, 08:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 103
another question about familiars in general:
Starting at its master's 3rd level, a familiar can deliver a touch spell. How would this ability interact with Produce Flame? could your familiar hold the charge and deliver the touch attacks, and while just holding it, shed light like a torch?Please be mindful of what you say in public; sadly not all can handle sarcasm or The Internet Credibility.
My Homebrew:
Base Class: Warlord | Roguish Archetype: Inquisitor | Roguish Archetype: Thug | Primal Path: Rage Mage
Ongoing game & character:
Sajan Uttam, human Monk 6/Fist of Irori 3 (Legacy of Fire)
D&D/Pathfinder CV of sorts
3.0 since 2002
3.5 since 2003
4e since 2008
Pathfinder 1e since 2008
5e since 2014
-
2018-07-06, 09:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q.104
The Divine Oracle prestige class requires that you be able to cast two Divine Spells for entry. Can those be satisfied by two cantrips? Please provide citations.I play 3.5 DnD, WoW TCG, Warlord CCG, and DOTA 2.
Phantom Lancer Ava by Sgt. Cookie!
-
2018-07-06, 10:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Nebraska
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 104. Yes, pg 35 of Complete Divine has no mention of spell level in the requirements.
-
2018-07-06, 10:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
-
2018-07-07, 09:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Location
- ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 105
The Inspire Courage handbook mentions that having a level in Sorcerer grants the dragonblood subtype. Is this true?
-
2018-07-08, 12:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 105 No, it's not.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-08, 12:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 106
Perusing some forums, I've seen the general thinking seems to be that it is legit by RAW to use Cleave after an Attack of Opportunity that fell its victim, but is considered illogical (after all, the second target didn't provoke an AoO) and thus frequently houseruled against.
However, I do believe there is a RAW argument against it. The rules for Making an Attack of Opportunity state:
"An attack of opportunity is a single melee attack," and also that "[The Combat Reflexes] feat does not let you make more than one attack for a given opportunity,"...
To me, "a single melee attack" would preclude any Cleave to follow. Only feats that explicitly allow more than one melee attack on an AoO (which do exist, like Double Hit from the Miniatures Handbook) can break this limit.
Am I correct with this interpretation?
Q 107
While I'm at it, this made me think of something else...
The few techniques adding a supplementary attack in exchange for a to-hit malus (most often -2) on all attacks (like Flurry of Blows or Snap Kick) usually specify that the malus carry over to attacks of opportunity made after your turn. In fact, as far as I know it is the case for any technique that lower your chance to hit, like Combat Expertise or Power Attack.
However, is it the case with Two-Weapon Fighting? Do you still have the malus to your primary hand to Attacks of Opportunity following an off-hand attack?
What made me wonder is how exactly it interacts with the aforementioned "Double Hit" feat...
Originally Posted by Miniatures HandbookLast edited by St Fan; 2018-07-08 at 04:18 AM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2018-07-08, 03:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 106 No
A 107 Yes. Yes.
Double hit doesn't change anything. You follow twfing rules normally.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-08, 04:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2018-07-08, 06:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 108
Does wearing a spiked gauntlet impede the use of that hand for other tasks, such as wielding a different weapon, casting spells or using a skill such as Disable Device? Citation needed if possible, please.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2018-07-08, 11:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 109
RAI for the Dragonborn template seems to be that you must be good, but RAW doesn't explicitly state that it has a alignment restriction. Can you in fact be evil and be a dragonborn?
Originally Posted by Peelee
-
2018-07-08, 11:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 109
You don't need to be good, but you do need to be non-evil:
Originally Posted by RotD p.8My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2018-07-08, 11:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 110
Does the duskblade's Arcane Channeling ability allow him to channel a spell from a wand?
-
2018-07-09, 01:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 108 You only take penalties that are printed. Spiked gauntlet and "finesse"-like skills such as disable device lack any such proviso that spiked gauntlets impede their operation. You take no penalty, but I can't cite what doesn't exist.
A 110 No.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-09, 03:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Q 111
Can i use the power Animal Affinity multiple times to different stats or does it count as same source and doesnt stack?
Q 112
If i have supernatural transformation for my psionic powers. Are every power standard action to manifest or do they have their normal manifest time?
-
2018-07-09, 04:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 111 Yes, you can use it on multiple stats.
A 112 Supernatural transformation doesn't affect manifesting time. It is unchanged.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-09, 04:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Last edited by Troacctid; 2018-07-09 at 04:33 AM.
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2018-07-09, 09:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
Last edited by Arkhios; 2018-07-09 at 09:36 AM.
-
2018-07-09, 01:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 111 contention
You are both wrong.
Originally Posted by SRD
Animal Affinity only affect one attribute, and initiating it again just replace which attribute, overriding the previous use.
To affect more than one attribute, you specifically use the "Augment" variant of the power, which cost 5 additional power points. Trying to cheap out by initiating the power again isn't allowed, and it would render this option nonsensical.Last edited by St Fan; 2018-07-09 at 01:10 PM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2018-07-09, 01:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 111 again We both already answered this question correctly. Please don't muddy the waters.
The augment allows you to boost more than one ability simultaneously. That's the utility it offers over manifesting the power once for strength and once for dexterity, for example.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-09, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
I'll answer this as if it were another question.
You've referenced the stacking rules from the SRD, which is stripped of the examples. Here is the original text from the PHB.
The same spell can sometimes produce varying effects if applied to the same recipient more than once. For example, a series of polymorph spells might turn a creature into a mouse, a lion, and then a snail. In this case, the last spell in the series trumps the others. None of the previous spells are actually removed or dispelled, but their effects become irrelevant while the final spell in the series lasts.
Sometimes, one spell can render a later spell irrelevant. For example, if a wizard is using a shapechange spell to take the shape of an eagle, a polymorph spell could change her into a goldfish. The shapechange spell is not negated, however, and since the polymorph spell has no effect on the recipient’s special abilities, the wizard could use the shapechange effect to take any form the spell allows whenever she desires. If a creature using a shapechange effect becomes petrified by a flesh to stone spell, however, it turns into a mindless, inert statue, and the shapechange effect cannot help it escape.Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2018-07-09, 02:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
-
2018-07-09, 02:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #34: Mere mortal, not immortal, not starcrossed, anymor
A 110b That does not change the answer. Arcane channeling allows a duskblade to channel spells that he gets via slots from being a duskblade. Regardless of how he owns, handles, or uses wands, arcane channeling does not allow him to use wands.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2018-07-09, 03:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016