Results 1,261 to 1,290 of 1521
-
2019-11-23, 09:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A434
Tabaxi can use theirs claws to make unarmed strikes. PC are proficient with their unarmed strikes. So yes.
Ditto with a centaur's hooves, a lizardfolk's bite, or a minotaur's horns.
Are claws melee, simple, light, and or finesse weapons?
If you make a bonus attack with your off hand natural weapon, do you add your ST modifier and proficiency modifier?
-
2019-11-24, 11:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q435 can a multiclass wizard learn a spell of a slot he has because of multiclass? For example a wizard 4/artificier 2 has slot of level 3. But he doesn’t have any level 3 spells by default. If he finds a spellbook with a level 3 spell, can he copy it in his spellbook learn it and cast it?
Last edited by Myth27; 2019-11-24 at 11:25 AM.
-
2019-11-24, 02:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A435: No.
The level of spell you can cast is based on the single level of the various classes you possess; so from your example, you can only cast up to 2nd level spells from the wizard list and 1st level spells from the artificier list. You are unable to learn 3rd level wizard spells until you reach 5th lvl wizard.
The third level spell slots available to you can only be used to up-cast lower level spells. Like shooting off a 3rd lvl Magic Missile.
-
2019-11-25, 12:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q436
Do I understand Warlock spells known correctly that I can replace my lower level spells known with spells of my highest level? So eventually I won't know any 1st level spells at all (apart from Hex obviously)?
-
2019-11-25, 01:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A436: Yes*
Ever level you can you can sub one spell known for a new one, so when you reach third you can get 2 second level spells (one from the level and one from subbing out a one of your existing first level spells). Just remember that this only applies to 5th lvl spells and below.
Warlocks only get access to 6th and above though Mystic Arcanum, and that does not use the same 'sub-out' mechanic.
-
2019-11-26, 04:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Re 435:
There's enough ambiguity in the wording of the rules that you might be able to argue that the wizard can copy the spell, but they certainly still can't prepare it. And even if you allow copying, it still changes very little, because that wizard 4/artificer 2 could just carry the looted spellbook around until he picks up another level, and transcribe the 3rd-level spell then. If anything, it's better to find spells before you have the ability to cast them, because that way, you know that you don't need to use any of your freebie spells known from leveling up on those.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2019-11-27, 10:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
-
2019-11-27, 12:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q437
If I have more than one AC calculation available to me, when do I choose which one to use? Can I change it?
E.g. if I am a Tortle Monk, can I switch from using my Shell AC if I manage to get my Dex+Wis high enough that it would give me AC 18 or more?
What if I gain a new option for an AC calculation (e.g. by multiclassing)?
-
2019-11-27, 01:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- NE Tennessee
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
R437
You pick:
“Some spells and class features give you a different way to calculate your AC. If you have multiple features that give you different ways to calculate your AC, you choose which one to use.” Sorry, cut and paste from DDB, don’t have a page #.
To add, there is no language that restricts when or how often you decide which AC to use.Last edited by Emongnome777; 2019-11-27 at 01:12 PM. Reason: Added more to clarify
-
2019-11-27, 05:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Trafford, PA
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
R437
While this is technically true, there's one caveat particularly applicable to multiclassing.
Originally Posted by PHBLast edited by FrancisBean; 2019-11-27 at 05:25 PM. Reason: Corrected copy-paste typo
-
2019-11-29, 08:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q438
Acid says you can splash it on a creature within 5 feet, or throw it, but in either case you make a ranged attack. If I'm splashing acid on a creature within 5 feet, surely I'd count as being in melee with it, and therefore my acid attack roll would have Disadvantage? (Seems like this applies to other similar splash weapons too.)
-
2019-11-29, 05:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q439 does the spell “command” work on a raging barbarian (immune to charm) ?
-
2019-11-29, 07:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A438 Generally speaking, yes.
Rulewise you have disadvantage on all ranged attack rolls as long as you are within 5ft of one hostile creature that can see you and is not incapacitated (even if no melee attack has happened at all).
A439 The spell works. It doesn't cause the charmed condition or depend onto it to work (like, for example, Charm or Hypnotic Pattern do).
Furthermore "normal" Rage doesn't make a Barbarian immune to being charmed. Some features of some Barbarian subclasses do (like Mindless Rage), but it is not a normal "Rage" feature. I can't say for sure what "kind" of Barbarian you had in mind, so i can't say if the feature would protect or not from Command specifically (I don't remember one however that could apply, but i don't know every feature in the game by memory :D)Last edited by ThePolarBear; 2019-11-29 at 07:22 PM.
-
2019-11-30, 02:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q440
Does a dead character or creature have a hit point value of 0, or does it not have a value at all?
-
2019-12-01, 11:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
I've been asking quite a few questions here and you've all been really helpful, so I just wanted to say thank you.
Also:
Q441
Am I right to think that there are no general rules for bashing with a shield as a weapon? There is the Shield Master feat, of course, but would attacking with a shield otherwise just follow the rules for improvised weapons?
-
2019-12-01, 02:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q442: what are the RAW for wielding bigger than normal weapons? Can my 6th level bugbear barbearian use a fire giant's sword with proficiency for example ... He's got a 1000+ lb carry capacity; I'd think that would mean wielding a huge sword is logical.
-
2019-12-01, 03:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
-
2019-12-01, 03:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A440 It's... difficult. RAW there's no indication of what a "dead creature" even is, mechanically speaking: a creature that has a particular state of being dead and as such it does count as a creature, or an object. We do have an unofficial clarification on that but this being a RAW thread makes it a "there's not really much about it in "RAW"".
If you consider them creatures, there's no reason to assume the hps are any different rulewise, IIRC. (i might be wrong, going by memory).
If you consider them items, there are guidelines about item AC and HPs in the DMG.
A441 A shield is not a weapon, generally speaking. Since it is not a weapon it follow the rules on Improvised weapons (unless other specific rule).
A442 MM 278. Essentially disadvantage in using a weapon for creatures larger than your size and if 2 or more sizes larger it's completely up to the DM if it is even possible to use them at all.
Well, Shadowmonk'd. :DLast edited by ThePolarBear; 2019-12-01 at 03:22 PM.
-
2019-12-01, 04:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Near Atlanta,GA USA
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q443
Can one attack an adjacent target with a Reach weapon (especially one OTHER than a whip, and WITHOUT P.A.M.)?
If it matters, I mean a medium or small character.[Public Service Announcement]P.E.A.C.H stands for Please Examine And Critique Honestly[/Public Service Announcement]
Currently Running: Equestria Begins (A High Tactics campaign)
Extended Signature
My Homebrew is meant to be used, but, if you do, PLEASE tell me how it goes.
-
2019-12-01, 06:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A443 For "general" attacks: yes because:
- You choose a target that is within your reach/range (PHB 194, first sentence and again PHB 195, Melee Attacks).
- Weapons with the Reach propriety add +5ft reach to whatever reach a creature already has for attacks made with that weapon.
- Medium and small characters, generally speaking, all have a baseline reach of 5ft.
- Anything "adjacent" is within a 5ft reach, thus being also within any >5ft reach.
Last edited by ThePolarBear; 2019-12-02 at 04:54 AM.
-
2019-12-02, 01:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q444
If I shove a creature away from me, does it provoke an OA for leaving my threatened area? Does it provoke from other creatures whose threatened areas it might leave as a result of the shove?
-
2019-12-02, 05:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
-
2019-12-02, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q445
Can a Half-Elf take Revenant Blade feat?
-
2019-12-02, 08:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
-
2019-12-02, 10:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q446: what is the RAW for AC boosting reactions, such as Shield or parry?
In my group we play that if a player has the spell Shield, or the Defensive Duelist feat, the DM takes note of their AC, and doesn't call out their attack roll, only if it hits or not. That way, if the wizard could boost their AC to 22, but the giant rolls a 24, the wizard player doesn't say "oh no point in wasting a spell slot". Narratively it feels good, with the image of a mighty club stopping for a second against the orange barrier hastily thrown up, then breaking through to the wizard underneath.
We play with counterspell in a similar way, with "I cast a spell " first, so the player or the monster has to work to know what spell is being cast
-
2019-12-02, 09:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A446
The rules are pretty clear about how these features and when to use them are decided after the roll but before the outcome.
Your DM does not have roll in the open but you can always ask for a narrative extrapolation of the roll to help you make better decisions. "Their swing is unencumbered and aimed right for you; there seems little chance you will avoid it."
The same can be said of counterspell, the DM does not have to tell you what the spell is but based on your own class and prepared spells might say something like "it carries a lot of the tones and gestures of an evocation spell"
-
2019-12-03, 11:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- my chair
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q447
Alice has Bob grappled, she can move Bob with her at half her movement speed, correct?
So what happens if Charlie comes along and grapples Alice? Can Charlie move Alice away with them, breaking her grapple on Bob? Are any other checks required? Or would there just be some weird grapple-conga chain?
Thanks to anyone who takes the time to answer!Last edited by Mr. Crowbar; 2019-12-03 at 11:42 AM.
-
2019-12-03, 01:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
- Prime Material Plane
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
A447: Alice can move Bob at half her speed while she has Bob grappled. When Charlie grapples Alice, and moves her at half of his speed, the grapple with Bob is broken if, "...an effect removes the grappled creature from the reach of the grappler...".
So Charlie would need to move Alice enough to have Bob move out of her reach. Assuming normal 5' reach that would be 10' of movement from Charlie costing him 20' of speed.
-
2019-12-04, 05:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q448
Can I craft during a long rest? More specifically, can I make crafting progress for magic items during a long rest?
EDIT: Okay, less specifically. Am I summarizing the rules presented in Xanathar's Guide correctly?
If I'm making a mundane item, I need proficiency in the appropriate tool, and half the item's selling value in materials. It takes a number of "workweeks," which are 5 8 hour shifts that don't have to be consecutive, equal to the item's cost divided by 50. If it costs less than 50 gold, you can craft multiple items per week. Multiple people can help with crafting, dividing the time needed by the number of workers, with DM judgment.
If I'm crafting a magical item that is not a spell scroll or potion of healing, I need a formula, a special item that requires a level appropriate challenge according to the Magic Item Ingredients table, and proficiency in the appropriate tools or the Arcana skill (?), and it takes a number of workweeks and gold according to the Magic Item Crafting Time and Cost table. If the item is a consumable, such as a scroll or a potion (but not a potion of healing or a spell scroll!), half the workweek and gold cost.
If I'm crafting a potion of healing, I just need proficiency with the herbalism kit, and the time and gold specified in the Potion of Healing Creation table.
If I'm scribing a spell scroll, I need proficiency in Arcana, the appropriate spell prepared/known, and any material components required, and it takes the time and gold specified in the Scribing a Spell Scroll table.
With all of these, there are the associated complications tables and rivals and stuff, but I don't care about those at this pointLast edited by Nicrosil; 2019-12-04 at 06:44 PM.
-
2019-12-05, 10:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
Re: Simple RAW for 5e 4: Smackdown v. RAW
Q449
RAW (PHB pg 144) Armor Prof: If you wear armor that you are not proficient with you have DisADV on ability checks, saving throws, and attack rolls that involve ST or DEX and you can't cast spells.
If I give a shield to my IMP familiar (no PROF) his AC will increase by +2 and when he's INV he gets ADV for DEX saves / stealth, so the DisADV would cancel those to a straight roll, but he'd still force attack rolls against him to be at DisADV, right?
Is there a way to get a Familiar PROF?