Results 61 to 69 of 69
Thread: Dark Phoenix
-
2019-06-17, 04:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
Re: Dark Phoenix
Keep in mind that most people (even within the target demographic of people who like superhero stuff) likely haven't read the Phoenix Saga. Heck, given that the original comic came out in 1980, it's likely that a decent chunk of actual comic book readers haven't read it.
For movie-going audiences, the familiarity with Phoenix is entirely from Last Stand. Which was terrible. To make matters worse, it's a re-telling of the whole plot again. Superrhero movies do have a distressing tendency to re-tell origin stories over and over again, but they generally do try to vary it up. Especially these days, when attempts to do another re-hash of a story we all know is likely to fail (Fant-four-stic, anyone?).
I get why the studio and comic book fans would want to do the story. What I don't see is how they intended to overcome the awful taste left in the mouths of cinema viewers. They needed to build up a much higher reputation for quality before attempting this.
-
2019-06-17, 04:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Dark Phoenix
I expect they were counting on everyone having forgotten Last Stand because it was 13 years ago.
The entire MCU has happened since and they expected people to just go see the latest superhero thing.
We live in a universe where Aquaman made a billion dollars for gods sake! Anything goes.
-
2019-06-17, 05:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Re: Dark Phoenix
I don't think I get this. Shouldn't it be able to sit perfectly in a series full of other characters? That's how it worked in the original medium. That's why people cared about Jaime and Cersei (or Brienne), while caring about Jon and Daenerys, or any of the other characters/relationship storylines in GoT...or for that matter non-relationship storylines. Because we became invested in multiple characters over time, and then tumultuous things happened to some number of them and we were emotionally impacted. We were never impacted, though, by the characters with entire arcs completed in a single episode.
I mostly agree, and would like to add "...and properly develop the key characters..." between "quality" and " before attempting this".
- MLast edited by Mordar; 2019-06-17 at 05:06 PM.
No matter where you go...there you are!
Holhokki Tapio - GitP Blood Bowl New Era Season I Champion
Togashi Ishi - Betrayal at the White Temple
Da Monsters of Da Midden - GitP Blood Bowl Manager Cup Season V-VI-VII
-
2019-06-17, 05:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Dark Phoenix
The original version of the story took place over fI’ve years of serialisation (between the original Phoenix story and the Dark Phoenix), and that in a denser medium than film because comics can pack much more information into a panel. (especially back in the ‘80s, when they were much more text heavy)
Likewise Game of Thrones is a hundred hours of television not two and change. (Though Breaking Bad would have been a better comparison, that’s still 50+ hours of storytelling)
Dark Phoenix can sit in a series of other characters, but not in a movie.
Logan worked because the existing series had put so much emphasis on Wolverine, the same was never done for Jean and she’s never really interesting enough to carry the focus of the series until she at least has the power of the Phoenix to deal with.
-
2019-06-17, 06:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Dark Phoenix
As has been pointed out elsewhere, Dark Phoenix could be done well. As the capstone of a multi-year/multi-film arc. You maybe wouldn't need to build it for a decade like the MCU did with Thanos, but you would need a lot of prep time for the ground work.
FOX just decided to skip the entirety of Phase 1 and Phase 2 and the bulk of Phase 3 to jump right to Infinity War and Endgame (which they then smashed into a single film).
-
2019-06-17, 06:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: Dark Phoenix
There's also the fact that part of the Deal with Dark Phoenix was that Jean was retired. She'd stopped being a superhero and was living a normal life. She gets kidnapped and when they go to rescue her this crap happens.
What happens to Jean isn't her fault. So it's all tragic. And SHE's the one who decides enough is enough. She doesn't decide how Dark Phoenix starts, but she sure as hell decides how it ends. Not the Shiar who want to punish her as a monster, not the X-men who are trying to save their friend. She decides how she's going to die.
-
2019-06-17, 06:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Dark Phoenix
That was not on the table + them doing Dark Phoenix at the same time.
With the first class reboot the main cast did a 3 movie contract and Dark Phoenix is the 4 movie and thus the actors did not have to return. It was only money, good will, etc that caused the original cast to return.
Telling The Dark Phoenix story over several movies after Apocalypse was not in the cards due to these financial reasons.
Thus maybe the best goal was to tell a different X-Men story and not trying to rush Dark Phoenix. It is the Icarus phenomenon just accept Dark Phoenix being told on screen is not going to happen, and if it does happen it will be ugly. Yet telling other X-Men stories could be satisfying.Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2019-06-17, 06:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Dark Phoenix
It's not impossible. It would just require them to not spend the previous three movies going all over the place across decades of time with more characters than can be readily counted (and who thus get no development). If they'd run a sensible arc instead of X-Men's Greatest Hits, setting up DP would've been child's play. Instead, they made essentially three stand alone movies.
-
2019-06-17, 06:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Dark Phoenix
Nods. But they didn't and the counterfactual of how to do it the MCU way did not exist at the time. Remember First Class was released prior to Avengers the first one, aka year 2011 vs year 2012.
Pretty much you can blame this on Bryan Singer for meandering with 2 of the 3 movies, somewhat well followed by kind of poorly.
While at the same time giving props to Kevin Feige and a dozen other people with the MCU for having a rough framework (and the contracts to make the framework possible) and then spontaneously creating good stuff on that framework and having each movie pivot into the next link of the chain.
My point here is to contrast these two different things for how the approach this is fundamentally different.Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele