Results 421 to 450 of 1076
-
2019-01-10, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
ungelic is us
-
2019-01-10, 05:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
If we're going by statistical norms, then I guess it's just been proven that Vaarsuvius was born with a vulva.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-01-10, 05:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
-
2019-01-10, 06:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by Fyraltari; 2019-01-10 at 06:03 PM.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-01-10, 06:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
-
2019-01-10, 06:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Location
- six feet under
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
This is what I would have said if I were clever. It expresses my sentiments exactly.
Were you the one who was arguing that we should look at human traits a few pages ago, because fantasy races were basically humans with a few things changed?
I don't think animals are a great baseline for what is the norm, especially when fictional races are created from a human perspective and base. Maybe the tiger swallowtail has homosexuality rates of 0%, but that doesn't say anything about Rich Burlew's dwarves.Non caerulea sum, Caerulea nomen meum est.
Extended Signature.
I'm not not a humanoid. Come not not be one too.
Answer trivial questions in the OOTS trivia thread!
she/her
-
2019-01-10, 06:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Meridianville AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
The only time we've seen Belkar employ any tactics at all it's in his hit and run vs. Miko, similar methods are suicide against Haley.
Meanwhile Haley has a wand of fly and a +5 icy burst bow, and with haste (which she gets from her boots) can fire 5 arrows a round....
Haley wins in a real fight outside of a small white room.Last edited by Doug Lampert; 2019-01-10 at 06:14 PM.
-
2019-01-10, 06:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Location
- US
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
-
2019-01-10, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Olympia, WA
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
The Giant says: Yes, I am aware TV Tropes exists as a website. ... No, I have never decided to do something in the comic because it was listed on TV Tropes. I don't use it as a checklist for ideas ... and I have never intentionally referenced it in any way.
-
2019-01-10, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
What's this all about players? These characters have an Intelligence score, have they not?
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-01-10, 06:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Meridianville AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Wolves have enough intelligence to employ quite effective small unit tactics. Their Int score is lower than Elan's. I conclude that the combat tactics shown by various characters are not determined by a number on a character sheet.
On the opposite end: V is the "smartest" member of the order, but fought dumb until he realized he needed to work as a member of a team. Again, tactical choices are not being dictated by numbers on a sheet somewhere.
In the scene you reference, the Giant did not make an Int roll for Roy to think of that method. It is the sort of thing a player would think of, not based on a number on a sheet.
You can pick your terms, but tactics are being determined by personality and personal tenancies which do not use the D&D intelligence score.Last edited by Doug Lampert; 2019-01-10 at 06:28 PM.
-
2019-01-10, 06:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Yes. I agree that human stats are more convincing for projecting dwarven tendencies than animal traits are. Some people argue that stats on non-heterosexuality are possibly inaccurate because people might lie on poles because of social pressure. I referenced animal behavior because it makes for a good check on the accuracy of human statistics.
If animals are more likely to be heterosexual than humans are, then that means the stats for human sexuality are more likely accurate. This is because animals are unlikely to behave in ways they don't want to behave in, and if a human was to lie on a poll because of social pressure, it would be more likely for them to lie by saying they are heterosexual when they aren't completely heterosexual.
But even the highest polls for non-heterosexuality rates in humans are 20% or less, and that is significantly less than half. Making the safest assumption about an individual that we know nothing about, to be the assumption in which that individual is heterosexual.
But we do know something about Durkon; he enjoyed heterosexual intercorse. Now some people are homosexual, and some people are bisexual. I know there are more iterations of orientations, but let's just consider these 2 for argument's sake. Let's say the true number of non-heterosexuals is 20%. And let's say that there are just as many homosexuals as there are bisexuals. This reduces the chance that Durkon is not heterosexual from 20%, (2 in 10) to 11.11% (1 in 9). So, not only can you say it is likely Durkon is heterosexual, but also, there is evidence making it more likely he is heterosexual than a random person we know nothing about.
-
2019-01-10, 06:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
-
2019-01-10, 06:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Location
- six feet under
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
You may want to look at the quote by the giant in this post. Statistics for dwarves sex lives are hard to come by. I am not arguing that he is not heterosexual, I have no opinion one way or the other, but I am against this sort of argument. Dwarves != Humans
Last edited by Caerulea; 2019-01-10 at 06:37 PM.
Non caerulea sum, Caerulea nomen meum est.
Extended Signature.
I'm not not a humanoid. Come not not be one too.
Answer trivial questions in the OOTS trivia thread!
she/her
-
2019-01-10, 06:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Ain't seen no wolves in the comic.
Of course the Giant did not make any roll for roy's actions. What kind of writer leaves their writing to chance?
Surrealist poets. And Phil Dick.
V fights intelligently even before realizing they have to act as a teammate, see them taking out Red's golem or the dragon mother. Their problem was a deep-sated belief in magic's omnipotence, not any dumbness on their part. The characters "have" (pretty sure Rich hasn't bothered stating anyone beyond stuff like "low", "high" or "very high") intelligence score who reflects the personnalities Rich gave them. As such it makes sense to say that Haley or Roy would make better use of the terrain than Belkar's but not that their players would, because there are no players.
Indeed, that's backward.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-01-10, 06:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Location
- six feet under
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Ain't lookin' hard enough. Oona has a worg, which is basically a wolf. I've also seen some grey ones 'round tha forum, so watch out.
Non caerulea sum, Caerulea nomen meum est.
Extended Signature.
I'm not not a humanoid. Come not not be one too.
Answer trivial questions in the OOTS trivia thread!
she/her
-
2019-01-10, 06:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-01-10, 06:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
-
2019-01-10, 07:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Perhaps I'm reading The Giant's post differently than you are, but he seems to be saying that statistics should not be used to tell an author how to diversify his story. I agree with The Giant in this. What we are trying to do here is determine an aspect of one of the Giant's characters. I am not saying he has to follow statistical data in his characters. Rather, I am saying that such data is our best indicator of the truth when the truth is not apparent.
-
2019-01-10, 07:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-01-10, 07:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
I opine to the idea that until some kind of definitive statement is made, each character is Schrödinger-sexual: simultaneously of all and of none of the sexualities. Go forth, now, and write your fanfictions.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-01-10, 07:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
-
2019-01-10, 07:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
-
2019-01-10, 07:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-01-10, 07:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Location
- US
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Independent variables. Vaarsuvius's gender is a coin flip; four heads and one tails (or however you wanna distribute it) in the rest of the party doesn't really affect what Vaarsuvius has between the legs (and that's without getting into the possibility of elves having extra steps in reproduction, as has been hinted at elsewhere).
Similarly, the rough odds of Durkon having an interest in guys are about 1 in 5, according to the most generous statistics applied thus far. Given two pools of differing sizes, I'm inclined to say he's probably in the larger of the two until there is sufficient evidence to say otherwise.
(That being said, in the original context of "how would he rank marriage candidates", it's more or less irrelevant, since three of the five options presented are (definitely) male. About the only ranking it would really affect would be Haley's.
Incidentally as well, the disparity between men and women, population-wise, is slight; 49:51. That's nowhere near the statistical weight of 1:4, and it's in no way useful to compare them.)Last edited by Ironsmith; 2019-01-10 at 07:20 PM.
-
2019-01-10, 07:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
If we were trying to determine V's sex based on statistics, and not based on whatever hints the comic may or may not have given, then there would be about a 48.5% chance that V's sex is female, a 51.5% chance V's sex is male (and a small chance V is intersex). I think your suggestion that V would be more likely to be female comes from using US statistics (in USA, slightly more than half of all births are female) rather than world statistics (in the world, slightly more than half of all births are male). Unless you are referring to the number of females in the party, which I do not think is relevant to the chances of V being of female sex.
The disingenuous part of your post is where you say "definitely ad unambiguously". Nobody in this thread (and I have never seen anyone anywhere in this forum) argue that statistics are conclusive as to anything about a character, or in any way overrides the author's clear indication. The claim is just that, in the absence of any indications to the contrary, it is more likely that a character has the trait which is more prevelant in the real world.
For example, if there were a new poster on this forum, who listed their location as "USA", in the absence of any further information, it would be more likely that they were from New York, texas or California, than that they were from Alaska or Hawaii. If you were guessing the poster's specific location, statistics (percentage of US population that live in different states/cities) would probably give you the highest chance of guessing succesfully. Of course, as soon as you got a clear indication of their location (such as them telling you), then that would override the guess on the numbers.
In this case, I don't think we need to say that Durkon is statisitically more likely to be hetero than bi because we do have some (in my opinion pretty strong) in-comic indications that he is hetero.
-
2019-01-10, 07:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Location
- six feet under
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by Caerulea; 2019-01-10 at 07:32 PM.
Non caerulea sum, Caerulea nomen meum est.
Extended Signature.
I'm not not a humanoid. Come not not be one too.
Answer trivial questions in the OOTS trivia thread!
she/her
-
2019-01-10, 07:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
I mean, while I am convinced V was intended to be male I prefer to imagine female as to me it brings greater balance to the sex of characters in the comic, not to mention the subcategories of amusingly prickly characters, power hungry characters, bad parent characters, etc; and adds more variation to the personality of the female characters.
But isn’t it not going to be revealed?
-
2019-01-10, 07:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Oh, no. That's well within the margin of statistical error. And as I said, The Giant specifically writes Vaarsuvius as ambiguously gendered.
51% verses 49% is effectively "We don't know." Where something like 85% verses 15%, I think most readers would be surprised if it turned out to be the 15%, because it's just much less likely.
It seems to me like you're just trying to undermine my logic, by taking it further than a reasonable interpretation of it, would take it.
-
2019-01-10, 07:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Location
- six feet under
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1151 - The Discussion Thread
Non caerulea sum, Caerulea nomen meum est.
Extended Signature.
I'm not not a humanoid. Come not not be one too.
Answer trivial questions in the OOTS trivia thread!
she/her