New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 91 to 120 of 124
  1. - Top - End - #91
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Quote Originally Posted by Talic View Post
    @Bayar, Refs, Chile:
    Spoiler
    Show
    RAW doesn't outline specifically how to qualify what is enough "grabbing ability" to grapple. Only that you have to be able to grapple. Now, we've all seen the grapple mod listed for horses, which have no hands, have only ungainly legs, and are perfectly fine grappling. So there's at least SOME raw support for it, though, admittedly, by RAW alone, it can go both ways.

    Further, IRL, there are many grabs and holds that rely on legs only, including the figure 4, and a variety of others. Legs are capable of manipulation, and are capable of wrapping around someone firmly. If that's the standard that's used for whether or not grappling is allowed with an extremity, then it should be kosher.

    Spoiler
    Show
    http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0200.html

    Think that explains it...
    **** Photobucket ; RIP avatars

  2. - Top - End - #92
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    chilepepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Quote Originally Posted by Talic View Post
    @Chile, refs:
    Spoiler
    Show
    And in case you want to question the credentials, the author of that Wizard's article was a co-designer of D&D, and the chief designer of the Monster Manual.
    refs, talic
    Spoiler
    Show
    Monte Cook was a DnD game designer too, but Malhavoc Press products aren't RAW anymore than that reference you pulled up. Unless you can point to RAW that says you can make an unarmed attack while armed, you can no more do that than make a sword attack without a sword. Just because RAW doesn't expressly forbid it, doesn't mean you can do it. Yes, you can kick as an unarmed strike; but if you aren't unarmed, you can't make an unarmed strike to begin with. Hands, feet, etc. are options for how to deliver an unarmed attack. When you attack with a Morning Star, you can do piercing damage or bludgeoning damage. You still have to have a Morning Star in your hand before you ever get to that option.


    and concerning bayar's last post
    refs, talic
    Spoiler
    Show
    Nice! Got both the horse grapple and the kick while armed. It's not RAW either, but still funny!
    Last edited by chilepepper; 2008-11-17 at 01:04 PM.
    <--- Avatar made by bayar

  3. - Top - End - #93
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kyeudo's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Draper, Utah
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    GM Kyeudo

    Wow. We've got some serious rules lawyering going on here and Mavian isn't even involved.

    Chilepepper, you are wrong. There is no simpler way to put it. D&D is a game with contradictions built into the rules. The only reason you stop moving when you die is your hitpoints are less than the amount of nonlethal damage you've sustained.

    Talic has clearly shown that, despite the name, he has all the limbs and training required by RAW to make an unarmed strike AoO despite wielding a two handed guisarme. Checking into the grapple rules yielded no requirement that that attack be made by hands, nor did it define a grab as more than an unarmed melee touch attack. If you need to know how a grapple without hands could be possible, watch this video from 8:11 to 8:18.

  4. - Top - End - #94
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    chilepepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Thank you Kyeudo. I assume that means I'm out.
    <--- Avatar made by bayar

  5. - Top - End - #95
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyeudo View Post
    GM Kyeudo

    Wow. We've got some serious rules lawyering going on here and Mavian isn't even involved.

    Chilepepper, you are wrong. There is no simpler way to put it. D&D is a game with contradictions built into the rules. The only reason you stop moving when you die is your hitpoints are less than the amount of nonlethal damage you've sustained.

    Talic has clearly shown that, despite the name, he has all the limbs and training required by RAW to make an unarmed strike AoO despite wielding a two handed guisarme. Checking into the grapple rules yielded no requirement that that attack be made by hands, nor did it define a grab as more than an unarmed melee touch attack. If you need to know how a grapple without hands could be possible, watch this video from 8:11 to 8:18.
    What video ?
    **** Photobucket ; RIP avatars

  6. - Top - End - #96
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    That means my Invisibility is gone, and I am now where chile was.

    Next up is me, then dusker, then Glunk.

    My Actions: Any with LOS to where chile stood can read.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Well, time to try to 2 on 1 this thing.

    Move: from F24 to J19 (50').
    Standard: Ready an action.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Attack any enemy that enters my threat range.


    End turn. LOS needed. Turn will stand so long as there are no illegal moves. If I gain LOS to opponent, please give any noticable information that would assist me in threat determination, such as items in hand, any noticeable size changes, and the like.

    Stats:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Location: J19

    In hand: gauntlet (equipped), guisarme (2 handed grip)

    HP: 28/28

    AC: 13 (+3 armor, +2 Dex, -2 Rage)

    Saves: +7/+2/+0

    Abilities: Rage (used)

    Effects on self: Rage 2/9
    Last edited by Talic; 2008-11-18 at 01:24 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #97
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    LoS:

    Greenscales
    Spoiler
    Show
    No LoS except for Chile's unconscious body, of course.


    Dusker
    Spoiler
    Show
    No change in LoS. (See 1 or 2 LoS's back)


    Glunk
    Spoiler
    Show
    No change in LoS. (See 1 or 2 LoS's back)


    It's Dusker's turn.

  8. - Top - End - #98
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    theterran's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nirn
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Dusker - Round 3

    Assuming Glunk is still in M19, I will move to O19, drawing my Spiked Chain as I move.

    As a Swift Action, I will cast Blade of Blood and take 5 damage.
    As a Standard Action I will use Shadow Blade Technique and Attack Glunk.

    Attack1 - (1d20+6)[14]
    Attack2 - (1d20+6)[26]

    Damage - (2d4+1)[7] + BoB - (3d6)[6]
    If Both attacks hit...add this cold damage as well: Cold - (1d6)[5]

    End my Turn. (If he's not in M19, I'll have to change my move...)
    (edit)
    If both of those hit, I take the lower roll as my normal attack so there isn't a crit, if only the 26 hits, I'll need to roll a crit.

    Stats:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Location: O19
    HP: 12/17
    AC: 20 Touch: 16 FF: 16
    In Hand:
    SoF (3/10)
    Boots (0/3)

    Spell Slots:
    Level 0 - 3/3
    Level 1 - 2/3
    Maneuvers:
    Spoiler
    Show

    Sapphire Nightmare Blade, Shadow Blade Technique, Clinging Shadow Strike, Stone Bones
    Last edited by theterran; 2008-11-18 at 11:30 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #99
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SoD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Yup, M19. And no, the 14 doesn't hit. Roll your crit.
    For the last time, it stands for Shadow of Darkness!

    Thankin' Nevitan fer me babytar!

    Kasaad Shadowweb-Chitine Paladin of Freedom (now a clickable link!).

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauve Shirt
    SoD is my favorite too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerHunter View Post
    SoD casts Pun
    SoD's Pun crits TigerHunter for 10k.
    TigerHunter dies.


    Genderbender week comin' up! SoDess by Bisected8 *applause*

  10. - Top - End - #100
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    I think there was an LOS error.

    As I'm in J19.

  11. - Top - End - #101
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    theterran's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nirn
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Crit Roll
    Confirm - (1d20+6)[25]
    Damage - (2d4+1)[7]

    (edit) That's 20 Damage all together...I believe...since the 5 Cold damage doesn't count.
    Last edited by theterran; 2008-11-18 at 04:35 PM.

  12. - Top - End - #102
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Information for Glunk's turn, as the LOS was in error.

    I am in J19. I readied an action when I reached J19.

  13. - Top - End - #103
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SoD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Glunk, round IV

    5 foot step to N18, drawing my great falchion, and attack Greenscale with a two-point power attack ("Grah! I WILL Water Orc Orc you until you die to death!")
    attack - (1d20+10)[23]
    damage - (1d12+20)[31]

    And, in case of crit (18-20 range), open spoiler.
    [spoiler]1d20+10[/roll]
    attack - (1d12+20)[29]


    Battle State:
    Spoiler
    Show
    HP 7/27
    AC 15 (Touch 12, FF 13)
    In Hand: Great Falchion
    Location: N18
    Buffs: Bull's Strength 1/30
    Rage: 1/9
    STR: 30 (+4 potions, +4 rage).
    CON: 20.
    Will: +0


    Done.
    Last edited by SoD; 2008-11-18 at 05:10 PM.
    For the last time, it stands for Shadow of Darkness!

    Thankin' Nevitan fer me babytar!

    Kasaad Shadowweb-Chitine Paladin of Freedom (now a clickable link!).

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauve Shirt
    SoD is my favorite too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerHunter View Post
    SoD casts Pun
    SoD's Pun crits TigerHunter for 10k.
    TigerHunter dies.


    Genderbender week comin' up! SoDess by Bisected8 *applause*

  14. - Top - End - #104
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    theterran's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nirn
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Dusker - Round 4

    5ft Step to P18.
    Swift Action: Cast Blade of Blood (non painful type)
    Standard Action: Initiate the Sapphire Nightmare Blade Maneuver.

    Concentration - (1d20+7)[12] VS your AC

    Attack - (1d20+6)[8] (-2 if the Concentrate roll fails)
    Damage - (2d4+1)[8] + BoB - (1d6)[5] + SNB - (1d6)[1] (if con check passes)

    End my Turn

    (edit) Wow...epic fail...

    Stats:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Location: P18
    HP: 12/17
    AC: 20 Touch: 16 FF: 16
    In Hand:
    SoF (4/10)
    Boots (0/3)

    Spell Slots:
    Level 0 - 3/3
    Level 1 - 1/3
    Maneuvers:
    Spoiler
    Show


    Sapphire Nightmare Blade-x, Shadow Blade Technique-x, Clinging Shadow Strike, Stone Bones
    Last edited by theterran; 2008-11-18 at 05:22 PM.

  15. - Top - End - #105
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SoD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    ...damn it, why do I not type the right thing;

    Quote Originally Posted by SoD View Post
    Glunk, round IV

    5 foot step to N18, drawing my great falchion, and attack Greenscale with a two-point power attack ("Grah! I WILL Water Orc Orc you until you die to death!")
    I mixed up the characters with who was playing them, I meant to attack Dusker. I belive it's actually physically impossible for me to reach Greenscales from N18. We may need a rewind, as it should've been Greenscales turn before yours, and, if allowed, I might edit my post so I actually attack someone within reach...
    For the last time, it stands for Shadow of Darkness!

    Thankin' Nevitan fer me babytar!

    Kasaad Shadowweb-Chitine Paladin of Freedom (now a clickable link!).

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauve Shirt
    SoD is my favorite too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerHunter View Post
    SoD casts Pun
    SoD's Pun crits TigerHunter for 10k.
    TigerHunter dies.


    Genderbender week comin' up! SoDess by Bisected8 *applause*

  16. - Top - End - #106
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Wait a sec, terran. Glunk tripped my ready action when he got to 5 feet from me.

    Unarmed strike!

    (1d20+10)[24]
    If hit: (1d3+8)[10]
    If threat: (1d20+10)[27]
    If Crit: (1d3+8)[9]

    If hit, I use scorpion's grasp.

    Opposed Grapple check: (1d20+14)[24]
    If Successful, Enter your square and deal: (1d3+8)[10]


    Read SOD's above post. If the move you announced is illegal, it's gonna have to be rewound. However, it needs a high ref to do so. Technically, the attack was illegal, and the 5 foot step was legal. However, I have no problem with agreeing to a rewind to the beginning of Glunk's turn, as long as my partner agrees. Either way, he'll need to charge, and either way, he'll need to reroll.

    And both me and my partner have gold stars this match. Me for getting rid of Chile, and my partner for knocking you into 1-hit-kill territory. Only reason I went for Chile first is the invisibility option... Though the fact that he had a whopping 6 hp helped. With your 27, you're dang near impossible to 1 shot.
    Last edited by Talic; 2008-11-18 at 06:46 PM.

  17. - Top - End - #107
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    chilepepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Umm, when I died, how was it Greenscales turn? He took a readied action moving his initiative to right before mine which means everyone else goes before him. -my bad
    Last edited by chilepepper; 2008-11-19 at 11:24 AM.
    <--- Avatar made by bayar

  18. - Top - End - #108
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    theterran's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nirn
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    I thought he took an AoO...but I could be mistaken

  19. - Top - End - #109
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kyeudo's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Draper, Utah
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    GM Kyeudo

    I haven't looked over the match, but it seems both sides agree that Glunk couldn't have done what he did, so a rewind is in order.

    Since SoD caught it and reported it himself, we'll give him a full rewind to the start of his turn instead of making him keep the five foot step.

  20. - Top - End - #110
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Chile, my attack on you was an Attack of Opportunity, triggered by the reading of the scroll.

    Those don't change initiative count. Thus, my turn was right after I hit you. That said, it's currently Glunk's turn, and, per Kyeudo, he has his entire turn to play with.

    I'm in J19. Glunk is in M19. Dusker is in O19.

    I have a readied action.

    I believe that covers game state. You're up.
    Last edited by Talic; 2008-11-19 at 01:16 AM.

  21. - Top - End - #111
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SoD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Glunk

    5 foot step to N18, drawing great falchion. Attack Dusker (got it right this time!) with a 2 point power attack.

    (1d20+10)[24]
    (1d12+20)[28]


    Spoiler
    Show
    HP 7/27 (owch...)
    AC 15 (Touch 12, FF 13)
    In Hand: Great Falchion
    Location: N18
    Buffs: Bull's Strength 1/30
    Rage: 1/9
    STR: 30 (+4 potions, +4 rage).
    CON: 20.
    Will: +0

    Done.
    For the last time, it stands for Shadow of Darkness!

    Thankin' Nevitan fer me babytar!

    Kasaad Shadowweb-Chitine Paladin of Freedom (now a clickable link!).

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauve Shirt
    SoD is my favorite too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerHunter View Post
    SoD casts Pun
    SoD's Pun crits TigerHunter for 10k.
    TigerHunter dies.


    Genderbender week comin' up! SoDess by Bisected8 *applause*

  22. - Top - End - #112
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Assuming that drops my ally, it's my turn.

    If for some reason, that's not the case, disregard this (and I'll strike through it).

    Free action: Drop Guisarme.
    Full Round action: CHARGE! (to M19)

    Melee PUNCH attack GO!

    Attack: (1d20+13)[26] (+9 base, +2 rage, +2 Charge)
    If Hit: (1d3+8)[10]
    If threat: (1d20+13)[25]
    If Crit: (1d3+8)[10]

    Scorpion's Grasp (if hit)

    Opposed Grapple check: (1d20+14)[34]
    If won: (1d3+8)[9]

    All damage is lethal.

    EDIT: That should be 19 damage. No need to make the roll, in order to win the opposed check, you'd need to roll a 23 on a D20.
    Last edited by Talic; 2008-11-19 at 03:32 AM.

  23. - Top - End - #113
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    How do you get a +20 on damage rolls, SOD ? I can only count 19.
    **** Photobucket ; RIP avatars

  24. - Top - End - #114
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    I count 19 as well. 1.5 Str mod (str mod +10 right now, assuming you're potioned up and raging) is +15

    Power attack for 2 = +4

    That's +19. I mean, either way, you've got well over what's needed to render Dusker unconscious, but still.

  25. - Top - End - #115
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    theterran's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nirn
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Regardless...I'm down...and I think Talic dropped Glunk?

  26. - Top - End - #116
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Unless glunk has some special ability, or an AC higher than 26 while raging, it looks that way.

  27. - Top - End - #117
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SoD's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Yeah, I'm down. And for the final point, did you count the +1 damage from the reckless trait? (-1 atk, +1 dmg).
    For the last time, it stands for Shadow of Darkness!

    Thankin' Nevitan fer me babytar!

    Kasaad Shadowweb-Chitine Paladin of Freedom (now a clickable link!).

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauve Shirt
    SoD is my favorite too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerHunter View Post
    SoD casts Pun
    SoD's Pun crits TigerHunter for 10k.
    TigerHunter dies.


    Genderbender week comin' up! SoDess by Bisected8 *applause*

  28. - Top - End - #118
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Quote Originally Posted by SoD View Post
    Yeah, I'm down. And for the final point, did you count the +1 damage from the reckless trait? (-1 atk, +1 dmg).
    Oh...wow, you are reckless...
    **** Photobucket ; RIP avatars

  29. - Top - End - #119
    Banned
     
    Talic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    It works on so many levels, lol.

  30. - Top - End - #120
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Arena Tournament, Round 49: Chile IV and Glunk vs Greenscales and Dusker

    Greenscales and Dusker are the victors!

    Dusker gets a -5% res reduction for winning! Which is to say, he still has to pay nothing! Huzzah!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •