Results 91 to 120 of 154
-
2016-05-26, 02:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
-
2016-05-26, 02:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
You still fail to explain what you see as "solving problems" to actually be.
As has already been pointed out, the official material rarely needs you to mesh mechanical problem with mechanical solution at any point. Most of the time, you´re even supposed to just role-play the solution and that´s it.
So either the original creators of the system don´t understand their job, or the system they created itself offers way more depth than they ever intended to be used at the table.
-
2016-05-26, 02:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Avatar of Rudisplork Avatar of PC-dom and Slayer of the Internet. Extended sig
GitP Regulars as: Vestiges Spells Weapons Races Deities Feats Soulmelds/Veils
-
2016-05-26, 02:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2016-05-26, 02:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Solving problems means achieving goals.
You cannot roleplay into succeeding at skill checks or casting spells that do stuff.
You need the ranks or the ability to cast that spell somehow.
Problem: That treasure is guarded by four lv1 guards and I'm lv1 amd I want that treasure
Fighter: I can swing a stick but it's 4 vs 1 It will not work. Cannot solve this problem
Rogue: I can use stealth or deception and then run. Difficult but I can solve this problem if I roll high enough.
Beguiler: I can make myself look like the owner, if something goes wrong I can make them sleep, or use grease and run, or simply use stealth. Piece of cake!
Different ways of solving problems. The fighter only has "hp depletion" as an option and becomes non relevant when that option is not viable.
Also in 3.5 caster classes are better at that as well making the fighter 100% uselessLast edited by Seppo87; 2016-05-26 at 02:33 PM.
-
2016-05-26, 02:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
-
2016-05-26, 02:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Actually, you still try to match mechanic with mechanic and that leads to your evaluation of apparent worth.
Mechanics and rules are a tool to help when the actual players involved can´t agree on the general outcome of a thing. You don´t use them if there is no disagreement at any point.
-
2016-05-26, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
We are in fact evaluating the system not dm fiat.
The system can be measured and discussed. Your personal preferences or anyone else's can not.
Sure you can tweak and ignore the system but it does NOT make the sistem balanced in itself.
Read "system does matter" if you can, asap
-
2016-05-26, 03:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
I rather think you did´t understand "system does matter" at all.
That is about the design decision to actively think about what you want in your game and create positive feedback mechanics so people will play the game as you have intended, having fun that way.
That is a pretty arrogant stance and actually led nowhere productive while still not providing an answer to the whole role-playing vs. game divide.Last edited by Florian; 2016-05-26 at 03:26 PM.
-
2016-05-26, 03:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
If the game is mechanically broken and you have to resort to arbitrary patches to fix it, the game is broken.
-
2016-05-26, 03:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Last edited by Florian; 2016-05-26 at 03:35 PM.
-
2016-05-26, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
the dankest memer in tree siddy
-
2016-05-26, 04:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
-
2016-05-26, 09:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Well, the fighter doesn't have a guarantee that he can kill all the guards in one hit. They are the same level, after all. It's likely they will survive the first round even if he wins initiative and then they have four chances to hit him.
With UMD, he still has to afford the wands and make the checks, which will be nigh-impossible with fighter skill points and starting wealth. Being a pseudo-caster with UMD kind of takes away the point of being a fighter in the first place anyway.
Also, what is a Nethack incarnate?Last edited by Tiri; 2016-05-26 at 09:12 PM.
-
2016-05-27, 05:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
If you played exactly by the books, no, it's not broken. Now, you'd have to start them at level 1 with no exp, and they'd have to progress at the normal rate (some 13.3 encounters per level, I hear?). By the time they got to the levels where things become problematic, they should know what's up and how to handle it, assuming they read the core books cover to cover.
At level 1, everybody is fine.
At level 3, you start fighting things like dire wolves and ogres, where people clearly start to see how they can be shafted by the rules if they don't play smart and work together.
At level 7, you get things like behirs and hydras, which will absolutely murder one pc per round unless they do everything right (and have strong, focused builds or otherwise get really lucky). But by level 7, they've been through some 75 odd encounters and have been playing for months.
It's harsh, and has bad options they can fall into, but it gives them a way out, as long as they're smart and tactical-minded (and not too proud to change when they're wrong).
I honestly like it just the way it is.
Can't speak for PF though.
-
2016-05-31, 12:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- In eternity.
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
@Flickerdart: Just have your team take hits for singles. You just need enough players to take the hits and you win!
-
2016-05-31, 05:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
-
2016-05-31, 06:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
D&D is not a game. No matter how you look at it, from CRB-only to all published material available, it´s just a smattering of tools and components that you have to assemble the actual game from.
You do the assembly according to what your personal understanding of how a game should look like, which is heavily dependent on how you´ve been socialized into the hobby.
Your opinion of what the game created by using the D&D rules should look like might differ widely from what other people with a different socialization expect that "D&D" would look like.
The rules, then, are only as broken depending on how good or bad they work with the actual game that you want to create based on them.
Edit: Considering that all editions had to create "Beginner Boxes" or some such to showcase what the actual game should be, as that is not included with the Core.Last edited by Florian; 2016-05-31 at 06:51 AM.
-
2016-05-31, 07:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Is this not a tautology? You have basically said, "if the game is broken, it is broken"
But I get what you mean, and agree. If the DM or group as a whole needs to resort to homebrewed patches or hand-waving, then the system is broken at some level (though not necessarily on the immediate surface, such as with completely new groups in their first few sessions)Last edited by Shnigda; 2016-05-31 at 07:07 AM.
-
2016-05-31, 07:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Game Design is the school of thought that studies games. That school of thought has multiple definitions of the word "game". I recommend not talking past each other merely for wanting to have your personal definition be the only definition by which the word "game" is used.
Since D&D is a set of modifiable length of modifiable rules by which DM create a campaign to run (the running of which is also called D&D), then we can certainly judge the set of rules by how well they work for DMs to create their campaigns from. Just like we can judge the campaigns by the enjoyment they create. You are right in this regard.Last edited by OldTrees1; 2016-05-31 at 07:11 AM.
-
2016-05-31, 10:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
I assume it's related to the classic rogeulike game Nethack. In this context, it probably refers to being hilariously paranoid types who carry ridiculous amounts of stuff with them for every possible situation. Which is somewhat mitigated by the fact that, at level 1, you don't have the money to be such.
Avatar by TinyMushroom.
-
2016-05-31, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
The set of rules imo is to be judhed by how adeherent is the experience provided following the rules to the stated intent.
Stated intent: challenge rating is a reliable indicator of challenge
Experience provided following the rules: challenge rating is unreliable
Stated intent: rogue is a master of skills
Experience provided: casters are the real masters of skills, without needing ranks, at all levels
Stated intent: reaping mauler is good at grappling
Experience provided: reaping mauler is decent at escaping grapple although FOM does it much better and they have anti synergic class features and a prerequisite that makes the prc stop working when they get large and getting large is the best way to be good at grappling
Stated intent: fighter is the best at fighting (yes it was actually stated, read the epic fighter's description. Don't get me even started on this)
Etc.
3.5 is as broken as a glass that's just been steamrolled.
Pretty much nothing works as intended.
Sometimes rules are so confusing and convoluted that we have contradicting faqs, sage advice, and "rules of the game" web pieces. Not even designers knew what they were doing.
"But dm fiat can fix it"
Sure but the game itself is still broken.
Just because you don't care or you believe you can make it irrelevant it won't become any less true.Last edited by Seppo87; 2016-05-31 at 06:25 PM.
-
2016-05-31, 06:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
My attempt at non-awful fumble rules
Arcane Archer minimal fix (maybe not so minimal anymore)
Reworking the Complete Adventurer Tempest PrC
Expanding the Pathfinder Called Shots system
Keyboard shortcuts for d20srd.org
Guide to Optimizing To-Hit
Obscure Psionic Power Index
🕷
-
2016-05-31, 07:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Basically, just don't be a douchenozzle and it's a wonderfully balanced system. Act like a self-centered dummy, and your game will be worse than week old mackerel left out in the sun during a particularly humid week.
-
2016-05-31, 08:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Here is my experience when 3e was new:
(1) My first attempt at making a character was a rogue/sorcerer with emphasis on charisma skills. There was no "arcane trickster" in these early days, so it was a plain rogue/sorcerer. But I only got to play him a couple of times. Clearly, I hadn't found anything too broken here, but I noticed some cool AC tricks (shield spell for +7 (in 3.0)). So my next attempt was:
(2) A wizard. And I wanted to see how high his AC could go, since in 1st/2nd editions, wizards usually didn't have such great ACs. I took a level of monk (which would be strongly contraindicated by most optimizers) so I could get WIS to AC and evasion... and then I just kept casting all the spells that boosted AC, and got useful feats like Persistent Spell to keep them going and took Incantatrix levels and... it was all pretty awesome. Then, add Polymorph and AC went through the roof. As did my basic melee combat ability. Once we got a magic spear from a salamander, I even had a good melee weapon to use. And I was better in melee than some of the other characters.
One of the other characters had been made with help from the DM. It was supposedly a super mobile skills guy, but a monk/rogue multiclass was a terrible multiclass combo. This character was utterly useless.
One of the other characters was a paladin. He was utterly useless. He had a griffin mount which was cool, but it kept getting killed.
There was a cleric who... was nothing special.
And... there was some crazy multiclassed archer who was a little bit of everything who did ridiculous damage with his arrows. Of course, he wasn't tier 1 or anything but when it came to mere combat, he killed everything in sight. The monk/rogue and paladin couldn't compete with him at all. They couldn't even compete with my wizard!
So... yeah, with new players, you can totally have completely mismatched unbalanced characters.
Later on, in near-epic levels, my wizard and the archer were able to go on adventures by themselves. We fought a high CR golem from the epic level handbook, with my wizard "tanking" with a crazy AC that the golem couldn't hit, while the archer stayed back and shot at it until it died.Last edited by SimonMoon6; 2016-05-31 at 08:54 PM.
-
2016-05-31, 10:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
A friend of mine made a comment which rang true to me. D&D is actually two games (So is Pathfinder, but if I say Pathfinder and D&D are actually two games, that just confuses the matter, because they are very similar in the fact that they are two games)
Part of D&D is dungeon-delving and being Big Damn Heroes saving dragons and slayingprincessesevil queens, where everyone has to work together to defeat [Menace].
The other part of D&D is magical God-Kings playing xanatos speed chess.
The Tier 1 classes have (to varying degrees) been given tools to play in both of these games. The 'Martials' have been given the tools to play in one of them.
Unfortunately for the Martials, the game makes a natural progression from one to the other, by dint of the options that got published options. When level 15 rolls around, the fighter and ranger are still getting options to face down combat encounters. Really nasty combat encounters, but combat encounters. Casters are getting spells like Guards & Wards, Greater Teleport or Forbiddance
So there's a fundamental disconnect in what classes are able to. Fighters could have been given feats which let them strike before immediate action teleportation, or hack spells in half, but they weren't.
So as people who enjoy playing martials, who start out contributing in very obvious ways while their friends around the table are also contributing in obvious ways, slowly find that their character is becoming sidelined (unless the GM is very careful) and then they're stuck in the middle of the plot with characters who they're invested in who just...aren't useful, and there is little recourse to actually fix this in progression, because the PRCs that are open to them are often too little too late (most Gishes, and they require casting anyway), or have restricted flavour (Ur-Priest).
That's my 2c, anyway.Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
My Homebrew:Spoiler
The Clanhold Warden - Dwarf Racial Archetype for Dreamscarred Press' Warder
Glorious Thunder - The God's own wrath as a Paladin's ranged option.
-
2016-06-01, 08:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
-
2016-06-01, 09:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Newcastle, Australia
- Gender
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
Its as broken or not as you make it. Yes the rules can be taken to extremes and such but are not innately so. There will always be the people who seek to wring the heck out of any rules system to extract maximum advantage from it but for each instance of that there is the people who don't care and just play.
Thankyou to NEOPhyte for the Techpriest Engiseer
Spoiler
Current PC's
Ravia Del'Karro (Magos Biologis Errant)
Katarina (Ordo Malleus Interrogator)
Emberly (Fire Elemental former Chef)
Peril Planet
-
2016-06-01, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
What's your definition of "reliable"?
Because to me "works pretty well in the overwhelming majority of cases" sound pretty reliable.
Stated intent: rogue is a master of skills
Experience provided: casters are the real masters of skills, without needing ranks, at all levels
Stated intent: reaping mauler is good at grappling
Experience provided: reaping mauler is decent at escaping grapple although FOM does it much better and they have anti synergic class features and a prerequisite that makes the prc stop working when they get large and getting large is the best way to be good at grappling
Stated intent: fighter is the best at fighting (yes it was actually stated, read the epic fighter's description. Don't get me even started on this)
But ok, it is probably quite possible to find a satisfying definition of fighting. And probably the fighter class can't be used to be the "best" for all of it. But neither could any other class.
So we might have a false assertion here. So what? It doesn't really matter.
3.5 is as broken as a glass that's just been steamrolled.
Pretty much nothing works as intended.
Sometimes rules are so confusing and convoluted that we have contradicting faqs, sage advice, and "rules of the game" web pieces. Not even designers knew what they were doing.
-
2016-06-01, 11:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
Re: In Your Opinion, How Broken Is 3E?
CRs are relatively accurate, with notable exceptions (dragons at least being deliberately so). Rogue is very much master of skills, regardless of a (very well planning things out) wizard being able to make those skills potentially irrelevant. Grappling is just as messed up (or more) than it was in all previous editions, so any PrC or build based on it is in fact messed up. The point is ceded. Fighters (along with monks and paladins) are some of the least effective classes, and a whole book was put out to create new versions of them that better conform to the power level that the designers considered baseline play.
And believe me, no one is going to get you started. You seem to have that taken care of.
3.5 is as broken as a glass that's just been steamrolled.
Pretty much nothing works as intended.
Sometimes rules are so confusing and convoluted that we have contradicting faqs, sage advice, and "rules of the game" web pieces. Not even designers knew what they were doing.
"But dm fiat can fix it"
Sure but the game itself is still broken.
Just because you don't care or you believe you can make it irrelevant it won't become any less true.