Results 61 to 90 of 1130
-
2013-05-05, 02:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Really nice. I love how there were more and more hints that none of this was true, until the biggest one, when Xykon says "Roy" right before he dies... yeah, right.
I wonder if every member of the Order is experiencing a completely different illusion right now? Or can they hear each other and are they integrating it in their own "dream"? I guess we'll figure that out.
EDIT: Also, I gasped when Mr Scruffy died. I don't really care that Belkar is still alive, but I'm really glad Scruffy is too. We can't see him on the last panel though so I wonder if the illusion works on him or if they didn't bother to make the rune apply to animals?Last edited by Lissou; 2013-05-05 at 02:59 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 02:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
-
2013-05-05, 02:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- empty space
-
2013-05-05, 02:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
When i saw belkar die i thought it was still possible to be real, but then mr. scruffy. I knew it couldn't be. No one harms the scruffinator :)
-
2013-05-05, 03:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
I remember the previous comic's thread pointing out how Redcloak's eyepatch was just tantalisingly out-of-frame, which made me associate the question of "illusion or not" with whether he'd have an eyepatch or not. So as soon as Redcloak walked into this comic with an eyepatch, I thought to myself, "Oh no, this is actually happening!" I would never have noticed it was on the wrong eye (let alone the holy symbol being the old one too).
What masterful tricks. They got me hook, line and sinker – for a good while. I tip my hat to you, Giant. For every person who rules-nitpicks you, there are bound to be ten times as many fans who are just blown away by how excellent your storytelling is.
-
2013-05-05, 03:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
-
2013-05-05, 03:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Here.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
You mean O-Chul, not Thanh, right?
Ha! I didn't even notice the progressive purple hues.
... I also did not note Scruffy dying. Thank god it's an illusion. I love that little cat.
Yeah, their voices seemed kinda off to me, too. And I can't believe I didn't notice the eyepatch flip - that should have been a dead giveaway, but nope, we all totally fell for it! I did notice that his holy symbol was round vs. square again, but I couldn't remember if he'd gotten a replacement one that looked more phylactery-like, so I didn't think much of it.
I'm left puzzled what the fake RC was referring to when he says that Xykon "already used that line" though.Last edited by DaggerPen; 2013-05-05 at 03:04 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Thank goodness the gate has some defenses left.
Unfortunately, they appear to be enchantment rather than illusion, which won't stop Xykon at all.
The DC must have been pretty high to stop Roy, but that's not surprising if they came from Girard.
Given that (a) all epic spells are literally made from scratch and (b) there is no rule saying that the sample ones suggested for characters by the ELH have totally unique names, it's perfectly possible to make your own "Superb Dispelling" that follows the rules of the seeds themselves rather than the text of the preprinted one.
It isn't even homebrew or breaking the rules - literally by the rules of epic spell development, you are making your own. Unless you have a quote from the Giant that says "Xykon is using the one from ELH pg. 87 with no variations," then you can't authoritatively state what is and isn't true regarding it.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2013-05-05, 03:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
This has been gone over before. Alot of people do not agree with this explanation. I am one of them. Superb Dispelling is not a theoretical spell that doesn't exist (as I have heard some people say). It exists, many set epic spells exist, and if you pick to develop that specific spell of it, then it does not dispel an AMF under the rules. Whether a homebrewed version of it would work differently is another matter, and someone else can do the calculation on it. Secondly, the Dispel Seed doesn't dispel everything. It CAN dispel things it doesn't normally dispel, but it doesn't say it necessarily will in any given instance (and what the limits and lines drawn are). There are spells it would be outright absurd for Superb Dispelling to stop, so clearly it doesn't dispel anything. The written version just doesn't give it that ability.
-
2013-05-05, 03:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by JessmanCA; 2013-05-05 at 03:04 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
That's just cruel. And mean. And, admittedly, a really good explanation for how suddenly Xykon turned up, which seemed kind of fishy.
-
2013-05-05, 03:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Wow...
Also, Mageparadox, why the heck do you keep bringing up Xykon's epic spells? You've managed to convince everyone who gives a crap of your lack of understanding of the epic rules, and made it clear that you consider mechanics which aren't even necessarily used in actual D&D games to be more important to a non-game comic than the stuff the comic is actually about (plot). What are you trying to get at?
When i saw belkar die i thought it was still possible to be real, but then mr. scruffy. I knew it couldn't be. No one harms the scruffinator :)
-
2013-05-05, 03:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
The subtle tinting of the panels to a purple hue is a very nice touch. I didn't even notice it until I saw the last two panels.
-
2013-05-05, 03:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Yeah....I suppose....seems a big stretch though, especially given Xykon's specific order about not regenerating his eye. Seems most likely that Team Evil isn't there, surely?
Which is not to say they are not in the pyramid somewhere; they're just probably nt in that corridor right now.The prison was full of British officers who had sworn to die, rather than be captured.
Avatar by Rich Burlew: The Giant Stuck It To Me!
-
2013-05-05, 03:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Actually, 1 problem with my theory: Roy's sword is put away in the last panel. Although, he still could have put it away after he 'killed Xykon' while enchanted.
-
2013-05-05, 03:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
The Voice of Mod: OK, no more discussion of Dispel seeds or epic magic or anything related. It's off-topic and has been done already. Move along.
Rich Burlew
Now Available: 2023 OOTS Holiday Ornament plus a big pile of new t-shirt designs (that you can also get on mugs and stuff)!
~~You can also support The Order of the Stick and the GITP forum at Patreon.~~
-
2013-05-05, 03:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Here.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by DaggerPen; 2013-05-05 at 03:11 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
If they're all experiencing the same illusion, what is Belkar seeing at the present?
-
2013-05-05, 03:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Forest Grove, Oregon
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
WOW! That was intense. I actually thought the title was pretty suggestive of it being illusory even before I read the comic ("from within" indeed), but admittedly once I WAS reading it, I was reading as fast as I could while going "holy crap!" so often it became a little hard to track all the off-details. I'm not sure I ever would have caught Redcloak's eyepatch (that was brilliant), although I did on the re-read spot the increasing purple tint and Vaarsuvius' lack of injuries.
-
2013-05-05, 03:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Anti-climatic as it was... I really thought Belkar was dead.
Anti-climatic as it was... I really believed Xykon was defeated.
You got me, there, Giant.
Heh... V's line about overhearing Roy's plan should have tipped me off.
PS: I blame Haley!Last edited by ManuelSacha; 2013-05-05 at 03:16 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Noticed two things while re-reading;
1: Ha! That title is awesome! One of the best, I think.
2: Holy crap Mr. Scruffy charges at Xykon and dies. I cannot believe I missed that the first time.
-
2013-05-05, 03:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by JessmanCA; 2013-05-05 at 03:17 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Czech Republic
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Yep. I absolutely loved this little detail.
Excellent strip, Giant.
I wonder what will happen to the Order now? They are now...eh, even more completely screwed than they were before. Maybe the Illusion will be able to tell they were not going to use the Gate?
Oh, and I'm looking forward to see Nale in the corridorThere must be some sense of order - personal, political or dramatic - and if no one else is going to bring it to this world, I will.
Silent member of Zz'dtri's #698 Scrying Sensor Explanation Club.
-
2013-05-05, 03:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
-
2013-05-05, 03:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Here.
- Gender
-
2013-05-05, 03:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
I don't get what all the fuss about the superb dispelling is about... You're telling me that an illusion of Xykon who tried to use a made-up spell that fizzed and thus we don't know if it works or not, would not have worked if it had succeed? It wouldn't have proven anything even if it had succeed on-panel, it was all an illusion anyway...
-
2013-05-05, 03:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Whoops! Should really be smarter and read page 3 before I start throwing my two cents in.
Anyways, a fun fake out! And I have to agree with the earlier poster, while this was short enough that things felt off, it was way better than dragging it on appropriately and leaving folks feeling cheated.
You have to feel for Roy, sacrificing so much to stop one maniac and receiving zero recognition from said maniac despite being involved in the major screwing up his plans big time and in person twice now!Last edited by Fowlor; 2013-05-05 at 03:24 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 03:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
-
2013-05-05, 03:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
-
2013-05-05, 03:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
I was thinking that Xykon is from a class that's defined as not knowing what they're doing to some extent. It's plausible that in the heat of the moment, he didn't realize that it didn't work.
Then I realized that it doesn't matter what the real Xykon knows. Does Roy know anything reliable about spellcasting. Even if the illusion is a group effort, the most know legible caster there is Elan...
DM'ing Trouble In Orlane IC | OOC
Stick figure character portraits I've made for myself and others.
"I think most gamemasters would agree that their world functions significantly more smoothly before the PCs ever show up." -