Results 841 to 870 of 1476
-
2011-05-08, 04:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
-
2011-05-08, 04:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
-
2011-05-08, 04:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Old Jersiaise
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
...well, that's optimization for either (Social or physical) combat, which... should really not be the focus of the game, if only for sanity's sake. But if you want that:
Combat Tier 5: You're a 'support' character, and die instantly if JB is rolled in your vicinity.
Combat Tier 4: As 6, but you splurged some of your charms/bp/xp on getting the easiest-to-access Perfect Defense, and so don't die.
Combat Tier 3: A modicum of combat charms, mostly just an Excellency a couple of assorted treats (incl PD), but you rely on avoiding combat more than winning it.
Combat Tier 2: Decently focused on combat. While there are one or two things that aren't combat-related that you can do, more than a few of your charms and Xp has gone towards being a better fighter.
Combat Tier 1: Your basic, un-charm-enhanced attack is scary enough that anyone you turn your attention to has to PD or die. Outside of combat, you sit around waiting for combat, counting sheep and staying off-scene, training for more charms that you'll never use seriously because of your all-consuming base dice pool and the paranoia that you'll die if you activate any Charm that isn't a PD.
-
2011-05-08, 04:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2011-05-08, 05:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Huh, my group would be a 4,3, 2x2 and a 1 by those numbers. Interesting. Although our 4 is currently in the process of
training for more charms that you'll never use seriously because of yourall-consuming base dice pool and theparanoia that you'll die if you activate any Charm that isn't a PD.Last edited by Kylarra; 2011-05-08 at 05:02 PM.
BEEP.
-
2011-05-08, 05:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
I've played lot of freeform roleplay, but that still doesn't mean there is no risk, there is risk in everything, believing that there isn't is the highest foolishness, for you cannot go through life without acknowledging it.
my first freeform roleplaying game? my character died seventeen times. I was angry at first, but I eventually accepted it and it became a funny running gag.
-
2011-05-08, 05:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- BC, Canada
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
If your character died 17 times, then I'm a bit confused as to what the risk is. That it'll be 18? If he's still around after the previous 17, I don't think that's a big deal.
And anyways, it sounds like the point you're trying to make is that there's risk in everything, all the time, but also that there's risk in roleplaying games, and so that risk is what defines roleplaying games? But if there's risk in everything, then of course there's risk in roleplaying games, so that can't really be what defines them. I'm gonna throw my voice in with Xefas here. A roleplaying game is defined by the roleplaying.Originally Posted by Grifter, character in game I'm GMing
-
2011-05-08, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
To avoid a semantic miscommunication, and hopefully a full thread derailment, I'll simply state that it depends on your definitions of "roleplaying", "game", "risks", etc. And no, I'm not being pedantic. Game design is a legitimate academic field. It is complex.
See Game Theory
Crane and Sorenson's panel, Game Design Is Mind Control
The Forge
The Forge Provisional Glossary
If you want to start a thread on the topic, feel free to do so, but it's off-topic for this one.
-
2011-05-08, 05:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2011-05-08, 05:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- A long, long chain
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Anyway, buying a Shaping defense and a surprise negator isn't particularly paranoid or risk-averse in Exalted, since Shaping and surprise attacks are two things that will seriously wreck your day if not defended against and are built on the idea that defenses against them are readily available.
If you do a lot of fighting, it's just good sense.Last edited by Guancyto; 2011-05-08 at 05:16 PM.
Rider avatar by Elder Tsofu
-
2011-05-08, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- WI, USA
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
-
2011-05-08, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
-
2011-05-08, 05:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- BC, Canada
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Or, taking a more reasonable approach, maybe the ST thinks, "Man. Fair Folk are really interesting! I'd like to have some of them in my game."
And if you think that in an existence where everything is a risk all the time, no one is ever going to think, "Those damn Exalts are wrecking everything! Let's set an ambush for them!"
...Then I guess it's no surprise that your character died 17 times?
EDIT: Not to mention, all it takes to be perfectly defended against Shaping is, what, 1 dot in Integrity and a single charm. Not exactly strenuous requirements.Last edited by DragonSinged; 2011-05-08 at 05:37 PM.
Originally Posted by Grifter, character in game I'm GMing
-
2011-05-08, 05:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- A long, long chain
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Nice to know my positions are instantly being converted to the most extreme form they could possibly be construed as. It's always fun to see that in the morning.
As always, it depends on the campaign. A Sidereal with Pattern Spider Touch will screw anyone without a Shaping defense. A fae... well, basically any fae ever is ten times more dangerous to someone without one. Heck, even Dragon-Bloods can do incredibly dangerous things with Shaping (see: Essence-Igniting Nerve Strike, Essence Disruption Attack). If you never meet those things, sure, you have no reason to care.
But if you do, the purchase of one (1) Charm with no prereqs and an ability requirement of 1? Is a steal to be able to say 'no' to all that.Last edited by Guancyto; 2011-05-08 at 05:41 PM.
Rider avatar by Elder Tsofu
-
2011-05-08, 05:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Wales, UK
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
A fairly basic question: if I have a PD, but I'm taken by surprise (which as far as I remember makes normal dodge/parry impossible and sends DVs to 0), is activating PD still possible (assuming it's a parry or dodge based PD)?
LGBTitP
-
2011-05-08, 05:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Hahah wow.
You are aware that the most horrific "you're screwed" effects in the game are Shaping, right? There's a reason for that: Shaping defenses are cheap and easy to get.
Good lord, must you read everything as a personal attack?
Yes. If it's a Solar-level PD.
Other PDs restrict you more. If it says it doesn't defend against unblockable/undodgeable attacks, for instance, it doesn't defend against surprise attacks.
-
2011-05-08, 05:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
While your assertion is correct (people shouldn't be jerks to each other), this stems from pretty poor game design in general.
If you want some awesome examples of games where it's pretty much impossible for the GM to be a jerkass to his players (accidentally or otherwise) without outright disregarding the mechanics of the game, see the various Vincent Baker games (In a Wicked Age, Poison'd, Apocalypse World, Dogs in the Vineyard).
I think Integrity Protecting Prana and the whole way the Shaping keyword is handled is some of the most egregiously poor design in the entire Exalted system. Not just because it's especially awful, but because it's so obviously so. I'll be the first to deride my 12-year-old brothers intelligence, but I have absolutely no doubt he would be capable of looking at Integrity Protecting Prana and saying "That is some ****ing crap design."Last edited by Xefas; 2011-05-08 at 05:45 PM.
-
2011-05-08, 05:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
It depends on the PD. Seven Shadows Evasion specifically says that you can't use it with surprise attacks, so you need to use something else to be aware of the attack first, and since it explicitly says that, I would assume there are PDs that do work on unexpected attacks.
-
2011-05-08, 05:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Sanguine actually brought this up earlier, and apparently Ablation of Brass and Fire works.
Also, slight tangent, but I just found out that some absolute badass added Dolorous Carnifex Style to the Exalted wiki. I don't know who, but much love, if they're reading this.
-
2011-05-08, 06:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
According to a statement from one of the Devs that statement in SSE is redundant, and automatically applies to all PDs, whether or not they have that line. It was brought up in a thread on the WW forums about Ablation of Brass and Fire.
Originally Posted by SkyBoundFencer
-
2011-05-08, 06:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Last edited by a_humble_lich; 2011-05-08 at 06:05 PM.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
--Will S.
-
2011-05-08, 06:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
A PD would have to explicitly state that it could be used on unexpected attacks for it to work against them.
Originally Posted by SkyBoundFencer
-
2011-05-08, 06:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Awesome Cyborg Doom Monkey avatar by Lord Fullbladder, Master of Goblins. Offer up your robo-bananas to him.
-
2011-05-08, 06:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Old Jersiaise
- Gender
-
2011-05-08, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
-
2011-05-08, 06:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
In 3.5 D&D, Wizards are Tier 1, but few people played them in a way so as to overpower everyone else. It's about capability, not actions.
You get to hang out with the optimized Truenamers from the D&D tier system?
Oh, no, there's lots of things with stuff worth taking, once you take into account artifact components.
The tears of just about anyone you beat is probably good for making something.
Alternately, you're an elder Celestial exalt and your paranoia is an extension of your crazy.
I envision that at the time of the Usurpation, many Solars probably seriously engaged in Paranoia combat, which is why even a mass ambush with overwhelming power left enough Solars alive enough to obliterate the entire city they were fighting in and turn the Usurpation into a brief world war.
Well, there's not really much to say about optimization outside of combat mechanics.
-
2011-05-08, 06:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- BC, Canada
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Does Protection of Celestial Bliss allow HGD to be used against surprise attacks? Cause it's got that line that says "...in any circumstance where using the charm would be legitimate."
Which kinda makes me wonder what the point of Protection of Celestial Bliss is. According to the Errata, you still need to pay the cost of HGD when the attack occurs, so is it some kind of rules thing that I'm not getting? Like you can use it to use HGD even after you've used another charm that turn or something?Originally Posted by Grifter, character in game I'm GMing
-
2011-05-08, 06:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Old Jersiaise
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
-
2011-05-08, 06:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate
Yes, because the charm activation is during the activation of Celestial Bliss, not HGD.
-
2011-05-08, 06:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Old Jersiaise
- Gender
Re: General Exalted Discussion IV: Roll Join Debate