Results 31 to 36 of 36
Thread: Redcloak missed one
-
2013-01-29, 03:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Germany
Re: Redcloak missed one
Vaarsuvius tried to throw in the rift and lost it (659/660).
After being found (823) the Resistance stole it (824).
I think this is fine reasoning - Redcloak could have argued about it might by valuable to could feed him false information, but so he doesn't even need to. Whitout the Resistances intervening he would have been forced to tell Jirix about it (since the phylactery should go straight to him), so letting them the possibilty to steal it was crucial. (Sure, maybe he could have told Jirix more, but safer for Redcloak if nobody else knows anything).
And before V's action Redcloak has thought he not needed a fake phylactery.Last edited by ChristianSt; 2013-05-17 at 06:59 AM. Reason: Edited to add singature
Problems with [table]?
All you want to know about [table]!The Order of the Stick
Kickstarter Reward Collection
Last updated: 2016/08/09, containing:
9 Crayon Drawings | 21 Stick its | 47 Signature Doodles
Custom Avatar made by the Giant.
Thanks!
-
2013-01-29, 03:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Redcloak missed one
We know exactly how Xykon reacts to the Resistance stealing the phylactery. We saw it in the comic. And we also saw he stopped caring the moment he believed the thing to be aquired.
Xykon is only caring for results and if the Resistance does not pose an issue to his results he does not care at all. Redcloak had no problem at all in that regard.Ser Ilyn, Ser Meryn, Queen Cersei, King Joffrey, The Tickler, The Hound, Ser Amory, Polliver, Raff the Sweetling, Weese, Dunsen, Nale, Ser Gregor Clegane and Chiswyck: Winter is coming!
-
2013-02-05, 12:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Kansas
- Gender
Re: Redcloak missed one
-
2013-02-05, 01:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Banks of the Potomac
- Gender
Re: Redcloak missed one
The dialogue in 833 seems to imply rather strongly that Xykon already knows Redcloak doesn't trust him, that Xykon was working behind the scenes to uncover Redcloak's duplicity, and further that Xykon is fully willing to "smoke" Redcloak (or any other uppity minion) if that's what it takes to achieve world domination. At this point, it's simply a matter of positioning themselves to strike the first blow.
Suspiciously normal.
I'm from the Government. We're here to help!
2nd Age Elven Warrior by Vrythas. Elves are not pansies!
-
2013-02-05, 04:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
The goblin spy might have revealed information that implied Redcloak could have squashed the Resistance days or weeks ago. By not doing so, Redcloak allowed the phylactery to fall into elven hands. Even if in enemy hands for mere minutes, Xykon might simply kill Redcloak for that decision.
But it is worse than that, because there is no obvious gain to Redcloak for doing so. This is where the real trouble lies. Xykon might well guess that Redcloak was purposefully using the Resistance as a distraction.
Now the question becomes whether Xykon guesses incorrectly that the Resistance was just a lame excuse for Redcloak sitting on his keester in Goblotopia, or does Xykon guess the real reason -- that Redcloak was using the distraction of the Resistance for a few unaccountable minutes with the phylactery?Last edited by Snails; 2013-02-05 at 04:50 PM.
I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2013-02-06, 03:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Redcloak missed one
Ser Ilyn, Ser Meryn, Queen Cersei, King Joffrey, The Tickler, The Hound, Ser Amory, Polliver, Raff the Sweetling, Weese, Dunsen, Nale, Ser Gregor Clegane and Chiswyck: Winter is coming!