Results 211 to 240 of 377
-
2013-02-28, 07:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Gender
-
2013-02-28, 07:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Around
- Gender
-
2013-02-28, 07:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- The land of corn
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
-
2013-02-28, 07:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Yes, Durkon is running out of spells, but so is Malack.
Of course, this might be a similar situation to the black dragon vs V one, which teached us that whitout spells... Durkon is just an ale-sipping monkey. While Malack? He is still a vampire.
Speaking of V, I hope s/he's around and comes in blastin' fire on the Lizgreaper's tail as soon as s/he hears commotion with his/her delicate elf ears.
Durkon has already said that he doesn't want to call the others, so unless V or Roy decide to jump in and help him on their own intent... the future where Durkon goes back to his dwarven lands posthumously and brings havok to them (as a vampire), looks closer every minute.
Yup. Brilliant and unexpected doesn't sit well with us.
Boring and clichéd is more our thing.
PS: some people are still questioning Malack's alignment, and trying to convince us he's not Evil? How quaint!Last edited by ManuelSacha; 2013-02-28 at 08:47 PM.
-
2013-02-28, 07:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Durkon's best move at this point might actually be to kill Belkar. Durkon could then withdraw safely to rejoin the rest of the party, there would be no danger of Belkar being turned into a vampire, and the Order could always resurrect Belkar later on (which Durkon would probably insist on under these circumstances). I doubt Belkar would even be upset (at least until he realized he lost a level.) He would probably be impressed that Durkon could be so ruthlessly pragmatic.
-
2013-02-28, 07:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Gender
-
2013-02-28, 08:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- In a building.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
It's still only cannibalism if you eat your own species. Most of the races in D&D are similar enough that I would consider it cannibalism, but lizardmen and Kolbolds aren't mammals, so I wouldn't consider it cannibalism if they ate humans and related species, ethics aside. However, even as a funeral right cannibalism still generally taboo because it spreads diseases.
The act of eating sentient beings that isn't covered under the definition of cannibalism deserves its own word, frankly. Cannibalism is a more specific subset of that.
Edit: Obsessively fixed for wording.Last edited by Feddlefew; 2013-02-28 at 08:16 PM.
-
2013-02-28, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
Hypothetical Order vs. Malack, if Durkon retreats
Assuming Durkon can retreat to his friends...
Malack probably has <100 hit points. That is dangerously low when up against multiple foes at this level.
We know Haley carries a few silver arrows. Silver arrows employed in a magic bow will do the job.
Roy's sword has a mysterious green effect that damages undead. Regardless he can blow through a measly 10 DR with Power Attack, if necessary.
Belkar would have the most trouble. But he still gets his Favor Enemy (Humanoid Reptilian) bonus. With strength and magic bonuses, he will easily do more than 10 per hit, even if not much more.
Elan can cast Mass Cure Light to heal his friends and hurt Malack at the same time. That is a sweet 1d8+13 damage.
It adds up quickly, even without V around.I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2013-02-28, 08:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Around
- Gender
-
2013-02-28, 08:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: Hypothetical Order vs. Malack, if Durkon retreats
Last edited by Kish; 2013-02-28 at 08:19 PM.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2013-02-28, 08:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Durkon still has a bunch of wounds, did he CCW on Belkar or himself??
Bard with the self-discipline of a kitten on cocaine....
The "Tiny Firebreathing Avatar of Death!" himself!
I am a Neutral Good Human Bard/Wizard (6th/4th Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 12
Dexterity- 15
Constitution- 12
Intelligence- 18
Wisdom- 16
Charisma- 16
-
2013-02-28, 08:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
Re: Hypothetical Order vs. Malack, if Durkon retreats
The answer to Dominate is a 1st level spell. If Durkon does not have it, he is most definitely in trouble. Eventually Malack will succeed in Dominating Durkon himself.
For what it is worth (not much), seasoned dungeocrawlers put Extended Magic Circle Versus Evil on a couple party members for exactly these kinds of situations. At this level of play, such would last almost 5 hours, so it is a no brainer to do before combat.I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2013-02-28, 08:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- I wish I knew...
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
/facepalm
Durokon, PLEASE tell me you didn't forget a simple Protection from Evil spell, did you? You know, the one that suppresses mind controlling effects plus gives additional bonuses against evil creatures?SpoilerQuite possibly, the best rebuttal I have ever witnessed.
Joker Bard - the DM's solution to the Batman Wizard.
Takahashi no Onisan - The scariest Samurai alive
Incarnum and YOU: a reference guide
Soulmelds, by class and slot: Another Incarnum reference
Multiclassing for Newbies: A reference guide for the rest of us
My homebrew world in progress: Falcora
-
2013-02-28, 08:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
The assumption is that Malack's max HP is sub-100. As a vampire with no Con bonus and a level below Durkon's, that is not unlikely.
Edit: CCW removed the stab wounds Belkar dealt him. That left the damage from Flame Strike, which was remedied with CMW.Last edited by Shale; 2013-02-28 at 08:18 PM.
Originally Posted by The Giant
-
2013-02-28, 08:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Ah, not a possibility I'd considered, my mistake.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2013-02-28, 08:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
Re: Hypothetical Order vs. Malack, if Durkon retreats
I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2013-02-28, 08:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Hey, since Haley calls Durkon "D," does that mean we can now call him Vampire Hunter D?
-
2013-02-28, 08:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Boooooooooooo!
Originally Posted by The Giant
-
2013-02-28, 08:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
I really like that both Durkon and Malack have their moments of badassery in this fight. Both characters are great in my book, and whatever the outcome, I'm glad neither is going down without a fight. Also, I think my favorite part of this strip is when Durkon offers to resurrect Malack--that's a very Durkon thing to do and is one of the reasons he's a hero in this comic.
I can see arguments both for foreshadowing of Durkon's death (the last panel with Thor as well as the prophecy) and of an intervention by V (by virtue of being part of the half of the party with a good Will save). I don't know what I'm hoping for, but I would still like Malack to get out of this alive because there's a lot we could learn about him and the rest of his party.
-
2013-02-28, 08:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
DR and frighteningly high AC mitigate that low hp a lot when it comes to melee. Between lizardfolk and vampire, he's got ELEVEN natural armor while completely naked, toss a ring of protection +5 and bracers +8 on that (and he could have better, an epic ECL char should have epic wealth and items, and as a cleric he could cast while wearing proper armor under that robe, +5 mithril chainmail would be a lot better than bracers) and you're looking at AC on par with Xykon. (Oh, throw in dodge bonuses too, +4 dex for vampire and free Dodge feat so another 3 AC there)) Maybe even better (Almost certainly better). Roy might land a hit or two, but his later attacks with lower BAB are going to whiff, same with Belkar and Halley. Especially Belkar, who likely lacks a +5 weapon, let alone two.
In fact, his AC is so high that even if Durkon had Disrupting Weapon memorized (which would be handy for Xykon's minions, if not Xykon himself) it'd likely only be useful on an ally's weapon, since he's probably way outclassed.
...
Wait, that's it. Durkon is going to cast Disrupting Weapon on Mr. Scruffy's claws, who is going to roll a natural twenty and destroy Malack utterly. It'll be so dramatic (and hilarious!)Last edited by Stormlock; 2013-02-28 at 08:48 PM.
-
2013-02-28, 08:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Not that I dispute the usefulness of these spells, but to me, that sequence was less about game mechanics and more about Durkon's character. His essence. His integrity. This is the dwarf who, in On the Origin of PCs, said:
Spoiler
It don't matter none tha they be rotten warts on tha arse o' tha world, I still have a duty not ta get 'em killed. Tha's what being a dwarf is all aboot.
-
2013-02-28, 08:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Toledo, Ohio
- Gender
-
2013-02-28, 08:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Prince Fraternal of Pudding, Snuzzlepal, Feezy Squeez Lover, MP, Member of The Most Noble And Ancient Order Of St. George, King of Gae Parabolae.
Lego Ergo Sum
"Everyone's cute if you just look at them the right way"~Rebekah Patton Durham, Princess of Pudding.
"If they have stats, we can kill them... I'd like to point out that we also have stats..." ~ PhoenixGuard09.
Warhammer 40K: Where the faction that is a cross between the Inquisition and Space Nazis are the good guys.
-
2013-02-28, 08:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Algarve (The West)
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
The 200 year thing tells us that Malack's kids were indeed vampires.
Avatar: ruthless Parson (Erfworld).
-
2013-02-28, 08:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
I like Durkon and don't want him to die. I agree with the analysis that the story has foreshadowed the possibility of his death here. I understand that to make a good story, sometimes beloved characters have to die. So if this is the end of Durkon, or the beginning of undead Durkon, it won't have been unexpected, and it might be necessary, but I'll still be sad.
-
2013-02-28, 09:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
The issue with that is that it is cannibalism when unintelligent (for our purposes, Int< 3) creatures eat other members of their own species. It doesn't carry the moral weight, of course, as they aren't really capable of moral action, but the term is properly a technical one, not a moral one.
-
2013-02-28, 09:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
I was re-reading Don't Split the Party and noticed that The Giant stated that we'd be meeting another of the factions involved in trying to control the gates (presumably, the people who cast the scrying spell at the fake gate site).
Wouldn't this make a heck of a time to add that complication?
-
2013-02-28, 09:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- Korea
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Alright, new outcome prediction. I maintain my former idea that Durkon will lure Malack close to the outdoors, dispel his sunlight protection, and Spartan kick him outside.
My new hope is that, as Brom mentioned, Malack will have a magical item to keep him safe from sunlight, either as a backup or because he lied about the spell in the first place. He will use Gaseous Form, and scream as if the sun is burning him into mist or some such thing. Then he will either escape to fight another day...or try a counterattack on Durkon.
My hope, anyway.
-
2013-02-28, 09:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
The person who cast the scrying spell at the fake gate site was named Zz'dtri. We've met him.
(Yes, this is confirmed by Word of the Giant.)Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2013-02-28, 09:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #874 - The Discussion Thread
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature