Results 631 to 660 of 1485
-
2013-01-16, 07:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
-
2013-01-16, 07:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Buck and ball was probably standard by the late 18th century. Prior to that, there were examples of multiple loads (I think often two balls). Shot was probably used more for hunting -- especially in a time when your opponent had a good chance of being armored.
Historically buckshot was used by guards, but I'm not sure how far back that goes.
There really wasn't the need for a dedicated "shot weapon" and I'm not aware of any until the late 17th century. As most weapons were smoothbore just pick one that gives you the right spread and go with it. A blunderbuss was a kind of coach-gun. The bell end to the barrel doesn't do anything for the spread of the shot, instead it facilitates loading on the back of a moving carriage. :-) They don't show up until the 18th century (maybe very late 17th).
-
2013-01-16, 07:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Protecting my Horde (yes, I mean that kind)
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
-
2013-01-16, 08:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
It's not really my area of knowledge let alone expertise when you get that late, but my understanding was that it was a rather gradual process where the primer and the load became increasingly standardized. The invention of corned powder led quickly to the pre-measuring of powder for each shot, and shortly after that you see depictions of guys with little bundles of powder (sometimes with a bullet tied up in a second part, and / or the pre-measured primer).
Like this guy from 1585
See the little bandolier of pouches along his chest? The thing he has in his right hand is an aiming stake, which may also serve as a linstock. He would rest his gun on that when shooting.
The percussion cap came along in the early 19th Century, which was basically the primer with an explosive mixture (fulminate of mercury) that would detonate when struck by a hammer. Just like a cap if you ever had a cap gun. This is the basis of most bullets today. Gradually the brass cartridge evolved from the old cloth cartridge, through a paper stage (IIRC) and on to modern firearms.
Fusilier can probably fill in more details but I think that is the basics of it.
G
-
2013-01-16, 08:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Goats feet and cranequin had become pretty widespread by the 15th Century but I'll defer to your familiarity with Italy on this one. I think generally though when people talk about crossbows, they tend to conflate or confuse different types, since they all look quite similar. In Central Europe there were several distinct types or grades of crossbows in use side by side, including the stirrup crossbow, all the way to the phasing out of all crossbows as military weapons by around the mid 16th Century.
I think this is the source of a lot of the confusion in the endless debates about English longbows vs. crossbows (and everything else). They tend to compare longbows to light crossbows when talking about range and penetration and then to windlass crossbows when talking about reloading.
It's kind of like with guns, a lot of people couldn't tell the difference between a carbine, an arquebus, a late or early musket, or a blunderbuss, but as we know they were very different weapons with different levels of performance.
Actually a pavisieri didn't necessarily carry a pavise, and was usually a spearman with a shield of some sort. By the middle of the 15th century such shields were usually oval or round shaped. Still big but not a pavise (in the sense that it could not be planted on the ground).
Pavises may have continued in use Central Europe for a bit longer. Here you can find the Bohemian's boasting about their pavises as late as 1519.
http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=2711
But I get the feeling that they were rather behind the times tactically speaking (not technologically speaking, however).
But where are the Spanish and French pavises from that time period?
By the early 1500s the Spanish were starting to show themselves to be a leading military power, and while an early adopter of arquebuses, they still employed crossbowmen.
Pavises limited the infantry's mobility, and as tactics evolved they were increasingly discarded. It's not like there's a switch thrown, and suddenly everybody threw their pavises into furnaces -- but over time their use diminished. That diminishment may have occurred at different times in different places. But it's pretty clear it began in the 15th century and was complete, at least by 1550.
I suspect their decline was due to muskets, and cannon.
G
-
2013-01-16, 09:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Protecting my Horde (yes, I mean that kind)
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
That matches my limited knowledge, so that seems reasonable. I know that percussion cap were still in use by the time of the US Civil War, and were basically standardized to the point that they could mass produced by the Union, or imported by the Confederacy. Of course by that point the common firearm was a rifle, rather than a smooth-bore firearm.
-
2013-01-16, 09:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Regarding the blunderbuss / dragon / musketoon family of weapons, I gather they were used somewhat extensively in the 18th - 19th Centuries for naval warfare, notably by pirates, and also to some extent by cavalry (isn't 'dragoon' derived from 'dragon' as in the short blunderbus?).
That is interesting about the rifles in the US Civil War I thought it was mostly still smoothbore muskets at least in the early part. I know by the end the North had lever-action rifles which must have conferred a huge advantage I would guess?
G
-
2013-01-17, 12:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
-
2013-01-17, 12:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Basically. Smoothbore muskets were around in large numbers at the start of the Civil War, whereas the newer rifle musket design (referred to as M1855, but not entering production until 1857), was only available in limited quantities. Some smoothbore muskets had been rifled as well, a conversion process that continued during the war. At the beginning there was so much need for muskets of any kind that they imported all sorts of weapons. Gradually as the war progressed you would see fewer and fewer smoothbores, but they never disappeared completely, even in the Union armies (especially in the western theater).
Rifle muskets were the "standard" design at the time. There were several forms of breechloader available, and even a few repeaters -- but they were rare. While it is true that a Union soldier would be more likely to have a repeater, they were never widespread among the Union army. At the end of the war, some of the cavalry regiments seem to have been well equipped with Spencer repeating carbines -- but the army abandoned these during the late 1860s for single shot breechloaders.
-
2013-01-17, 01:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
No. The percussion cap was just the primer, it was an explosive designed to detonate on impact, usually a "fulminate" of some sort. The main charge of gunpowder still had to be loaded independently.
On some breechloader designs (Sharps carbine and rifle), a paper cartridge containing the powder and bullet could be loaded into the gun as a unit, but a percussion cap still had to be placed on the "nipple". For muzzle-loading weapons, if paper cartridges were being used they were opened, the powder poured down the barrel, then the bullet inserted (either with the remainder of the paper, or squeezed out of it -- depending upon drill manual used).
The percussion cap, is in my opinion, a huge revolution. Or at the very least the first step in a revolution. It allowed for the concept of a "self-contained cartridge", in which all the ammunition components are bundled together in a single unit.
The first designs were paper cartridges, with gunpowder and bullet sandwiching the percussion primer. Soon metallic cartridges were invented -- they solved the problem of gas-seal by being able to expand when fired, then contracting slightly allowing for extraction of the spent cartridge.
At this point magazines start to become feasible, as well as automatic weapons, etc.
-
2013-01-17, 02:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Pavise
Osprey Men-at-Arm 94: The Swiss At War 1300-1500, pg 16:
By the time of the Burgundian Wars the pavise had ceased to be used by the Swiss as a protective shield for crossbowmen and handgunners, although it was probably used in siegework.
-
2013-01-17, 04:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2013-01-17, 07:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Cippa's River Meadow
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
I will do, weather permitting. *Tries to keep a straight face*
Out of curiousity, do you have a book and page reference for the scene in question? Our range has moveable targets, so I can actually test the feasibility of hitting a target at that distance while using a 3ft wall as cover (within the limitations of my bow).
-
2013-01-17, 08:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2013-01-17, 09:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
It's quite possible that author was indeed thinking of some really heavy warbows there, which can pretty much only be shoot from upright position, with the whole use of back, legs etc. to draw it.
With lighter bow that one can more or less comfortably draw with motion of shoulder area only, one can obviously try to perform more 'tricky' shots.Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2013-01-17, 10:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Cippa's River Meadow
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
While I won't dispute the first point as I have limited information on the scene in question, I will the second. Unless you're very strong, any full drawing is done using the back muscles, even with comparatively light bows.
With half drawing you can get away with arm only, but I had sufficient space to reach full draw using my back while kneeling (hence why I listed my bow length and my height). If you had a very long bow that you couldn't hold while kneeling, then I would agree that would be an issue, but most self bowmen I've seen tend to angle their bows anyway as they don't have an arrow rest.
Aside from giving the archer a steady base, I'm also not quite seeing how the legs are involved in drawing a bow, unless you've got really odd technique.
-
2013-01-17, 11:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Steady base, as of point to push/pull off, while drawing really heavy bow, shifting your weight to be able to pull the bow...
English archers were even often depicted barefoot for maximum adhesion, AFAIR.
Here's fun little video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyEIk...layer_embedded
Upright posture is pretty obviously universally required for human to perform "maximum strength" lifting, pushing, throwing, hacking and whatever, bows are not different.Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2013-01-17, 12:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Found a very good website on the history of early firerams, thought people here might be interested
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~dispater/handgonnes.htm
G
-
2013-01-17, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Cippa's River Meadow
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Huh, interesting video. It's from the English Warbow Society so presumably it's a legitimate historical technique.
From the society entry requirements, that selfbow has a minimum draw of 70lbs at 32" full draw (my arms won't even reach that far ). I will question what sort of accuracy that technique has though, but if you're just firing into formations, I guess it doesn't matter that much.
That said, the Mongols are renowned for their horse archery and what research I can find suggests their bows had a similarly heavy draw weights, so I presume it's still possible to not need your legs to draw powerful bows (with some technique modification).
Some additional research suggests that English bows were also used mounted, although with some issues as the mounted archer could only really fire sideways effectively - firing forwards as horse archers often did usually resulted in the bow poking the horse, which affected your accuracy and reload times.
My turn for interesting videos: Battlefield kyudo.
While he's using a yumi (Japanese bow) which is designed to be off centre, he doesn't appear to have any trouble drawing or hitting his targets while kneeling.
I can't find any reference to the draw weight of his bow, although war yumi were recorded to have a draw weight of 90lb (I doubt that this bow is that heavy though).
-
2013-01-17, 02:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- kendal, england
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
to expand on others points:
the concept of a cartridge ( a bullet and powder in a contained case of some sort) appears to date back to the 1500s as shown. they contained a ball and a mesured amount of powder, to speed up loading (compared to mucking about witha powder horn). Here is a a photo of some english civil war (~1640s) reenactors, whichs gives you a good idea of the size of the wooden cartridges. A dozen were carried, which led to the nickname "the 12 apostles" for the cartridges.
Paper cartridges were, according to the Wiki, used as far back as 1586, and, to my knowledge, replaced wooden cartridges sometime in the mid-to late 1600s, with paper being standard by 1700 or so. paper was better, because:
A. you can carry more
b. was easier to use than a wooden one,
C. the paper could be waxed or greased to add water proofing to the charge, making it work better in wet weather.
D. the paper acted as wadding (very important in a age where bullets were deliberatly made too small to easy loading).
Now matchlock weapons were standard in the 1600's and remained in use in europe in some roles until as late as 1720, if the Wiki is to be believed. I understand that in india and china the cheap and simple matchlock soldiered on to the early 19th century (i'm pretty sure that some indians in the 1810s and that most chinese in the 1840's faced off agianst british redcoats with matchlocks in hand).
one point i'd like to make about the different locks is that the wheel and flintlocks was that these were both more reliable than matchlocks (though even a napoleonic era flintlock had a field misfire rate of about 1 in 5 shots), and that the flintlock in particular was much faster and easier to load, as you didn't need to faff about with a piece of burning string in one hand while pouring gunpowder in the other, not to mention the fiddling about needed to keep the match burning properly (i'm pretty sure the frist dozen of so steps for loading a matchlock are dedicated solely to sorting out the match).
thus, a unit with flintlocks ws both faster firing and suffered fewer misfires than a matchlock unit, which led to thier quick adoption in europe.
next major innovation is the precussion cap, which replaced the small pan of powder (which was the major cause to misfires in flintlocks, as the powder here either failed to ignite or went off without setting off the main charge, a "flash in the pan") with a small 'cap' of precussion (shock) sensitive explosive (orginally, they tried to replace the whole powder charge, but the results were too unstable and shock sensitive for practical use, so they lowered the charge and created the cap). this, again, made the weapon quicker to load and more reliable, and was adotped around the 1840-1860 era, along with rifled barrels, leading to the change from flintlock mustkets to precussion rifles used in the Crimean and Amerian Civil wars.
Here is a video that shows both the loading of a precussion rifles and a civil war era cannon (which is basically the same as napoleonic era cannons, i believe).Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an` Tommy, 'ow's yer soul? "
But it's " Thin red line of 'eroes " when the drums begin to roll
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's " Thin red line of 'eroes, " when the drums begin to roll.
"Tommy", Rudyard Kipling
-
2013-01-17, 02:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Wow check this awesome gun out!
http://www.musketeer.ch/blackpowder/handgonne.html
and this one
Spoiler
both replicas of guns (or 'gonnes') from Danzig, I think 14th Century
GLast edited by Galloglaich; 2013-01-17 at 02:44 PM. Reason: adding spoiler tag
-
2013-01-17, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Good post. A minor correction, use of the percussion cap did not make loading any faster (in fact some claim it may have made it slower). But it was so much more reliable, and made the gun much easier to load in the rain.
A major difference between a civil war cannon and a napoleonic era one would be the ignition system. During napoleonic times they would have used a linstock (a matchcord on the end of a stick), or port-fire (think of a truck flare). Usually port-fire was reserved for instances where speed was desired. By the American Civil War, friction primers were in use. These were inserted into the vent and attached to a lanyard, which was yanked by the gunner to fire the piece.
You are correct about matchlocks (I've fired one) -- a lot of the drill is keeping the hand holding the burning matchcord away from the hand holding the powder!Last edited by fusilier; 2013-01-17 at 03:37 PM.
-
2013-01-17, 03:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- kendal, england
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
that does remind me. I;m resonably certian that at least some cannon in the napoleonic wars were flintlocks. the only pictures i;ve seen are in a naval context, such as here. you can see them agian in the flim Master and commander, where, notably, a main character gets his hand trapped under a flint during the final fight
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an` Tommy, 'ow's yer soul? "
But it's " Thin red line of 'eroes " when the drums begin to roll
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's " Thin red line of 'eroes, " when the drums begin to roll.
"Tommy", Rudyard Kipling
-
2013-01-17, 04:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Surprising how fast they can shoot one of those handgonnes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD6SbAzdvc8
G
-
2013-01-18, 01:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Osprey books are really useful and I particularly like that one, but it's wrong in that particular remark. They tend to be a useful 'starting point' for research but often miss details.
The Swiss were very conservative with weapons, Berne recently (5 years ago) liquidated some pikes they were still holding on to in the city arsenal which ended up on Ebay. I almost bought one.
The Swiss never emphasized guns or crossbows as much as a lot of other armies did, concentrating their strategy on their hard-hitting infantry columns of pikemen and halberdiers; but they did use gunners and crossbowmen as well, they were a very important part of the mix of forces, (typically outside of the main columns, in what were called 'forlorn' hopes') and these men did use pavises, as was common at the time of the Burgundian wars.
These photos are from Grandson Castle where a lot of the loot and weapons from the Burgundian Wars were collected and are now stored. Pavises were used on both sides and Charles the Bolds army during those wars was considered the most sophisticated and well equipped in Europe.
Spoiler
This one is burgundian
Spoiler
Swiss, from the Burgundian Wars
This is a Swiss Pavise from 1445
This Pavise from 1485 is from a part of the Tyrol contest between the Swiss Confederation and Austria, it could be German or Swiss but I think it's Swiss due to the red cross on white background
GLast edited by Galloglaich; 2013-01-18 at 01:50 PM. Reason: adding spoiler tags
-
2013-01-18, 07:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Yeah, but he's loading from premeasured chargers, instead of a powder flask. Laying everything out in front of you does help. Also the shortness of the barrel on those old hand gonnes helps a lot, as it greatly reduces the time for ramming. Nevertheless, with a similar amount of preparedness in a static position, like defending a town or castle wall, that's probably pretty close to what could be done in actual fighting.
-
2013-01-18, 07:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
I know the British did that with their naval cannons (at least by the Napoleonic wars -- I'm not sure when it started) -- it protected the priming powder from water spray. They probably abandoned it for friction primers, when those became available, but I'm not certain. I'm not aware of it being used on land.
-
2013-01-18, 07:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Galloglaich -- I agree with you on Osprey books, but it was the only book at hand that addressed the subject of pavises.
What are you basing your assertion on? The fact that there are some survival examples from roughly that time period? Some period drawings? Are those surviving examples statistically representational? Are the contemporary drawings even accepted to be accurate?
I see no reason to believe either -- period pictures could be based upon older works of art, and idealized reconstructions, and museums are often crammed full of ceremonial arms and armor that were never used in battle. That's often the reason the items have survived.
Finally, there's no claim that pavises weren't used at all during the conflict, just not in open warfare. If you want to refute that claim, I would like to see some reliable evidence.
-
2013-01-19, 12:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
Well, fair enough but it's rather thin soup. It's also (as much as I like that particular one) a fairly old Osprey book.
What are you basing your assertion on? The fact that there are some survival examples from roughly that time period? Some period drawings? Are those surviving examples statistically representational? Are the contemporary drawings even accepted to be accurate?
And the fact that there are 'some survival examples' from not only the same time period, but that they are from same specific series of (late 15th Century) battles you referred to (in the case of three of the images I posted) which I happened to know were at that museum because I'd been there a long time ago.
I see no reason to believe either -- period pictures could be based upon older works of art, and idealized reconstructions, and museums are often crammed full of ceremonial arms and armor that were never used in battle. That's often the reason the items have survived.
http://www.myswitzerland.com/en/le-c...-grandson.html
Finally, there's no claim that pavises weren't used at all during the conflict, just not in open warfare. If you want to refute that claim, I would like to see some reliable evidence.
But I am convinced myself of this and I think I've supplied sufficient counter evidence with some Swiss (and Burgundian) pavises from the period in question. Readers of the thread can make their own decisions, maybe I'm right, maybe you are, maybe we are both wrong. I think the main purpose of this thread is to provide information, which I've tried to do, not to win arguments.
And also on the larger picture - the issue of whether pavises were still widely in use in the 15th Century (and that their use peaked in the 15th). If you look at that excellent Myarmoury thread linked upthread here, you'll note most of the dozens of pavises they depict there are from the 15th or early 16th Century. The reason I believe they were still in use generally in Europe is that the Bohemians who we know used the hell out of 'em, were widely deployed as mercenaries from Northern Poland to southern Hungary. They were the basis of the Hungarian Black Army which I mentioned (and linked to) before, that was one of the biggest military players in Europe at that time.
The real question to me is, why, how did they work. The Bohemian ones used a special construction based on Lithuanian shields, with the central rib and so on, and they all seemed to be made of some kind of composite material of resin, sinew and linen over thick wood (soft fibrous wood, apparently willow in some cases) which may have acted like some kind of modern composite material or it may have just been like the older pavises, in which case you have to wonder how they protected against guns and recurves and heavy crossbows. But one thing I've learned from researching all this stuff, is that these people seem to have known what they were doing more often than not. The image of the ignoramus "Medieval Caveman" that we always see on TV doesn't hold up well in the historical record.
But to me, this is still something of a mystery.
G
-
2013-01-19, 10:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: Got a Real World Weapons or Armour Question? Mk XI
I am not sure that is true at all. Some French commentators mentioned that some of the English archers were so poor they went afoot, but I have never heard any evidence turning that around into a positive choice.
The really heavy bows used by the English War Bow Society are upwards of 120 lbs, which I suppose is why specialist techniques have appeared to deal with the difficulty. By the way, it was apparently early on in the third book that this occurred, when Lord Berrick's men are fighting the brave companions.It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)