Results 31 to 60 of 119
Thread: Fumbles
-
2019-09-22, 10:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Frozen City
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
If there's a friend don't fire. Friendly fire is 100% avoidable if you're making logical decisions. If you do hit a friendly target you have made a bad decision. Or an Evil(tm) decision. Even demons think twice about hitting a peer.
"Movement speed is the most important statistic in this game."
"Give them no mercy for they give no mercy to us."
"I see one of those I kill it!"
-
2019-09-22, 10:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
Re: Fumbles
Yes, but how many fumble charts account for fighting a stationary target, and how many simply require a 1 to be consulted?
And more specifically to your example, in all the presumably hundred of paintball rounds fired at friends (or strangers, depending on the range) how many times have you dropped your gun? Had all of the balls spontaneously explode in the hopper? Because those are just as likely to be found on a fumble table as friendly fire.
I'm not saying fumbles don't happen. I'm just saying if you want a realistic fumble, a master fencer might overextend and leave a hole in his defense that a similarly master fencer might exploit. He's not going to accidentally cut his own arm off.Last edited by Ryton; 2019-09-22 at 10:22 PM.
-
2019-09-22, 10:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- Seattle, WA
Re: Fumbles
Not quite fumbles, but my current table has the current house rule for skill checks: a nat 1 isn't an auto-fail, but imposes a -10 penalty to the role, and a nat 20 isn't an auto-succeed, but grants a +10 bonus to the check.
Originally Posted by Darths & DroidsOptimization Trophies
Looking for a finished webcomic to read, or want to recommend one to others? Check out my Completed Webcomics You'd Recommend II thread!
Or perhaps you want something Halloweeny for the season? Halloween Webcomics II
-
2019-09-23, 12:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
-
2019-09-23, 12:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
Depending on the tone and setting i don't disagree with this either. i however still enjoy the mechanic in a horror/gritty realism game a lot.
You're right. The examples given are far less likely to occure. This is why they'd be represented as a smaller percentage on the d100. For more realism you could add a seccond table referanced to by the initial fumble chart; however this would be overcomplicating things.Last edited by Asmotherion; 2019-09-23 at 12:53 AM.
-
2019-09-23, 01:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
Re: Fumbles
Since this is the d20 forum, the majority fumble rules are easy to show as bad, especially for skills. After all, they come up 1 in 20 times in that most of them work off rolling a 1.
For attacks, there's already a critical failure state, the automatic miss - that works because all it does is waste a single attack that may not have even hit in the first place. If on top of that you add in additional consequences, you're making attacking more frequently a curse, not a blessing. If a Fighter 20 with his 4 attacks has a higher chance of humiliating or worse hurting himself than a Commoner 1 does, it's a bad rule. Simple as that.
For skills, this ties into the rules for taking 10. In activities like skills, it should be possible to perform consistently and even perform under pressure. That's why taking 10 is a thing, to prevent someone who is knowledgable in a field from randomly not knowing basic facts about that field. If you even use the most basic of critical failure states - failing on a 1 - what you're saying is that in a dangerous situation, even a 20th level 30 STR Barbarian fails at jumping a foot upwards 1 time in 20. I'm hardly a paragon of fitness nor would I be particularly high level, but in a dangerous situation, I absolutely do not have a 1 in 20 chance to fail to jump a foot into the air.
If you're using another probability system, such as d100s, then the issue is lessened but not absent.Last edited by Divine Susuryu; 2019-09-23 at 01:11 AM.
-
2019-09-23, 01:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Fumbles
The use of supplemental, unofficial or-- worst of all-- homebrewed critical fumble rules is an instant dealbreaker for me. Not only are they a complete violation of everything I want from my roleplaying time, but long experience discussing fumble rules has taught me that their presence invariably means that the game will be filled with all kinds of other intolerable stupidity.
The only games in which fumble rules are even theoretically acceptable are games like Paranoia and TOON and other games that are supposed to be ridiculous, slapstick farces... and I generally do not prefer those sorts of games as a rule.
Which of those examples do you think should even occur one time in a hundred after a character rolls a 1 on a d20? Once in every 2,000 attempted attacks?
There's simply no way to make the "realism argument" for critical fumbles even remotely valid.
Other people have already pointed out how comedically unrealistic most fumble rules systems really are and how completely inappropriate they are for maintaining a gritty, serious tone, but I'm just going to share my Rolemaster story.
Now, I grew to love Rolemaster eventually, years later, even if I do still strip out the goddamned fumbles. But a couple of people in one of my old D&D groups, a long time ago, were Rolemaster people and they really went hammer and tongs into convincing me how much better Rolemaster was. (They were playing Rolemaster Fantasy Roleplaying, for reference, the 3.5 to Rolemaster Standard System's 3.0.)
I'm going to state this up front, that I had a real hard time with the system going in. I didn't have enough time to read and digest the rulebook, and Rolemaster Fantasy Roleplaying has an especially steep learning curve for people who aren't already well-versed in the ICE way of doing things.
So it took me almost two hours to finish up my character, holding up the rest of the game. I made some kind of lizardman fighter.
In our very first combat, finally, I rolled pretty poorly on my initiative and ended up going last... after a couple of orcs had disarmed me and wrestled me to the ground. This, admittedly, was fun and exciting. But pinned to the ground, I only had one real maneuver available to me... so I attempted use my reptilian nature and bite one of my enemies.
And I rolled a 03 on d%, a critical fumble. I had to roll again and subtract the result from 03.
And I rolled a 97, for a total of -94. Which means... I had to roll again and subtract the result from -94.
The guys from my D&D group are giving me knowing glances. The guy I just met chuckles. I get another pair of d10s out of my bag, and my girlfriend (at the time) blows on them.
00. -194.
The DM loans me his "lucky" dice. 96, total of -290, and just barely forcing another reroll. Everyone is now watching with rapt interest.
99 brings me to -389. On more reroll. 95. I utter the foulest curses I know and go to pick up the dice, but the DM stops me: "You only have to reroll on 96 or higher."
Total of -484. One in 3.2 million chance. We consult the fumble chart, and indeed, I have injured myself... to the tune of an E Critical and another E Critical on the Bite chart.
Got identical results on both critical rolls: Instant decapitation.
In the most realistic combat system in any roleplaying game ever, my character bit his own head off, twice, on his first attack roll.
I've never played a more realistic fantasy battle since.Last edited by FaerieGodfather; 2019-09-23 at 01:40 AM.
-
2019-09-23, 01:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
The only fumble rules I've ever seen be mostly functional are the ones from shadowrun 4e, mostly because the more skilled, better equipped and more apt you are for what you're doing the less and exponentially less likely you are to glitch. You can also succeed while simultaneously glitching, and glitches are decided by the GM and supposed to be not disastrous: knocking over an object you were jumping over and falling on a nail you didn't see is an example given.
-
2019-09-23, 01:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
Re: Fumbles
-
2019-09-23, 07:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Eastern US
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
So you would be OK with the ranged fighter sitting out most combats because there is almost always going to be an ally near an enemy? And the higher level the ranged combatant, the more they should sit out since they would be making more attacks, making it more likely to hit an ally?
Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
-
2019-09-23, 08:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
It's been said before, but I'll say it again.
It punishes martials for trying to do the one thing they're good at. I have the mentality of 'punishing' players for bad tactical decisions, the fighter swinging a sword at whatever needs to die, is a pretty sound tactical decision in my books. Arguably the fighter should get a bonus for swinging weapons, possibly in the form of some sort of good base attack bonus.
-
2019-09-23, 09:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
Since most fumble rules are applied to melee attacks as well as ranged, does this mean that everybody should just break off into 1v1 duels all the time (or 2v1 with flanking if your ally needs to be in reach to risk getting hit)?
That seems fair enough. I've just had bad experiences with people sticking fumbles into heroic fantasy, which left me rather soured towards fumbles in general.
-
2019-09-23, 09:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
It is traditionally the function of the enemies to provide this though.
If you want "gritty realism" you shouldn't want the kind of slapstick that most fumble tables devolve into as people find ever more goonish nonsense to fill them up with.
(Also you don't need fumbles for friendly fire. The best friendly fire rule I ever saw was in the skirmish game Infinity. If you fire into a melee you take a -3 penalty on a D20. If you miss by 3 or less you hit the wrong target.)Last edited by GloatingSwine; 2019-09-23 at 09:39 AM.
-
2019-09-23, 10:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Nottingham, England
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
I've been thinking a bit more about this, which as far as I can see is the main mechanical problem with fumbles (most of the other objections seem to come down to "I find they make the game less fun for me" or "they're nearly always badly implemented"). I think it could be largely solved by using a slight variant of the fumble mechanic in the DMG. If instead of always making a DC10 Dex check, you make either a DC10 Str check (for most melee weapons) or a DC10 Dex check (for ranged or finesse weapons) to avoid fumbling. This would mean that martial characters who specialised in either Str or Dex would get less and less likely to fumble on their chosen attack style as they go up levels, with the chance becoming zero if the relevant ability score reaches 28.
Not only do I always use some kind of confirmation roll as I already noted, in the current version I'm using the penalty for a standard failed confirmation is pretty mild: lose your next attack (if making a full attack) or half of your next move while you steady yourself, or take a -2AC penalty when next attacked if you don't have any actions left to lose this round (if you're not attacked before the start of your next turn, congratulations, you got away with it). I only get the "catastrophe table" (drop weapon, fall over, hit self, hit ally, break weapon) out if they get a natural 1 on the confirmation roll as well as the original attack roll.
-
2019-09-23, 10:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Frozen City
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
"Movement speed is the most important statistic in this game."
"Give them no mercy for they give no mercy to us."
"I see one of those I kill it!"
-
2019-09-23, 10:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: Fumbles
That still punishes martials way harder than it punishes casters:
Without fumble:
level 20 wizard rolls a 1: spell misses
level 20 fighter rolls a 1: attack misses
With fumble rule, no confirm:
Level 20 wizard gets an AC penalty: the miss chance they have from any number of the spells that do that don't care, their AC was uselessly low anyway, and they shouldn't be anywhere near enough to melee combat for an enemy using a single move action to endanger them.
Level 20 fighter gets an AC penalty: is now significantly more likely to die because any number of enemies can move in to kill them since they're at the front lines.
Lost movement:
Wizard: less likely to need to move, since they have ranged spells, if they absolutely need to move 30ft right away, can use any number of teleportation spells they can get.
Fighter: unless you're an archer, sucks to be you I guess.
Lost attack:
Wizard: never takes full attacks
fighter: functions at half effectiveness this turn since lost attack + the auto miss equals 2/4 attacks doing no damage
Crit fail with a confirm:
Drops weapon:
Fighter: looses 6 attacks worth of damage and opens themselves to opportunity attacks.
Wizard: lol wut weapon
hits someone else:
Fighter: someone else takes some damage
Wizard: someone else now needs to save or die, or any number of other nasty things (exhaustion, sickened, panicked etc.)
This gets slightly better with the introduction of caster implements, but it's still 2 lost spells vs. 6 lost attacks. add in the fact the martial characters are still more likely to induce a fumble, and that wizards can just use AoEs to never risk it and you have a supremlyy unbalanced system.
-
2019-09-23, 10:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: Fumbles
having played an archer, I can confirm that's not true. Encounters rarely outnumber you more than 7:1, which is the amount it would need to be for each square next to your allies to be full.
of course you could get in an archer battle, but in that case it's better to let your melee rush the archer, since archery provokes AoO in melee combat.Last edited by Voidstar01; 2019-09-23 at 11:01 AM.
-
2019-09-23, 11:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
Fumbles are for bad guys, and mook bad guys at that. When I DM, Random Orc #12 might roll a fumble on a 1, and have some hilarious catastrophe happen to him. That doesn't happen to PCs or main bad guys.
-
2019-09-23, 12:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- France
- Gender
-
2019-09-23, 01:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
Re: Fumbles
Fumble Resistance (feat): allows you to make <insert check here> to avoid fumbles. Does not work against provoked fumbles
Fumble Immunity (feat, requires Fumble Resistance): you no longer roll for normal fumbles, and allows <roll> (as Fumble Resistance) against provoked fumbles.
Humiliating Critical (feat, requires Improved Critical): whenever you would score a critical hit - even against foes normally immune to critical hits - you may force the foe to roll on the critical fumble table instead. If your weapon has more than a x2 crit, they roll an additional fumble for every multiplier of your weapons crit above x2.
Obnoxious Target (feat, requires Dodge): wherever the target of your Dodge bonus attacks you, they must make <roll> or suffer a fumble. This counts as provoking a fumble.
Provoke Fumble (spell, Sorcerer/Wizard 2, Chaos 1, Luck 1, Hexblade 1): target must make a Reflex save, or their next attack within 1 round/level provokes a fumble.
-
2019-09-23, 02:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Fumbles
This is actually an official variant..... For checks that auto succeed/fail on a 20/1 (which does not apply to skill checks). I had a DM that ran this for skill checks, and it was universally loathed by everyone at the table. It gave rise to the joke about olympic swimmers drowning in swimming pools, because even with +14 to swim, rolling a 1 results in you sinking under the water.
More often than not, this poorly concieved houserule is actually detrimental as opposed to helpful. Since most people will stick to attempting skills they're at least moderately trained in, it's rare that people will attempt something that would require a natural 20 to succeed, with or without the +10 modifier, thus, in most circumstances, the +10 modifier will never actually be useful, since you will succeed on something less than 20 anyway, and scoring above the DC doesn't do much. On the flipside however, it is quite possible to have a modifier so high that it will succeed even on a 1, however with this rule, you need a whopping +10 more to achieve that. Thus, more often than not, the +10 goes unused, while the -10 acts as an annoying hindrance.
Don't be this guy's DM. If you're going to use that variant, use it where it's supposed to be used: attack rolls and saves.
To be fair, mooks are different from minions. Orc #12 may not necessarily apply, but kobold or imp #12 could make more sense.Last edited by Crake; 2019-09-23 at 02:18 PM.
World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2019-09-23, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- Eastern PA
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
For my games i run both fumble and crit charts, it adds a sense of mystery to the game and lot of comedy. the charts is only rolled on combat because skills can't fumble or crit, you just did really good or bad.
as for combat, my PC love it when they crit a enemy and kill it in one shot, slicing off legs or arms, crushing skulls or just plain decapitating someone. but they know this comes at a cost, because fumbles can happen, and you can end up killing yourself or allies. but you need to look at it this way, you have a 5% chance to roll a fumble, some classes can even reroll, and if you do fumble, the first 40% (my charts are both percentile out of 100 and only the top 70% are really bad) don't really do anything, trip and fall, reflex save to not, or drop your weapon reflex save to not. but if they kill a fellow player they know they messed up, but they like that about the game, stuff happens in real life that can be very bad, now lets say your always doing dangerous stuff, that amplifies it. this makes the game exciting.
-
2019-09-23, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: Fumbles
Please tell me you at least have players roll to hit against their ally's AC when they're going to hit them? Nothing sounds more suck-tacular than dying because your friends great axe somehow phased through your greatshield, +5 fullplate, and +5 defending shortspear to decapitate you
-
2019-09-23, 08:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
The crucial insight is that special critical hits should give more than critical fumbles take away. When that doesn't happen, then all the bad things people are describing can happen.
Every time I've used special crits and fumbles, at many tables from 1976 to the present, the crits and fumbles have been confirmed the same way
Most of the critical fumbles from the chart in The Dragon #39 are saving throws to avoid a minor annoyance -- "lose grip on weapon; roll dexterity or less on d20 or no attack next round". That means that often, nothing happens - just an additional moment of tension. If not, then the minor annoyance occurs. Many of the rest are a small amount of damage. None of them are permanent damage.
I agree with you that critical hits should give more than critical fumbles take away. Any rule that fails to do that is a bad rule. But that doesn't mean fumble rules are bad. It means that THAT fumble rule is bad.
I agree with you that special critical hits should give more than critical fumbles take away. That doesn't say that fumbles are bad. It just tells you how to design fumbles that aren't wrong.
This is instantly fixed by ensuring that special critical hits give more that critical fumbles take away.
As with all other home-brewed rules, home-brewed fumble charts should be carefully designed to make the game fun for the players. If your DM isn't doing that with his fumble rules, then the problem isn't fumble rules; the problem is a DM who isn't making sure that his home-brewed rules are making the game more fun for the players.
I agree with you that stupid fumble charts are stupid. The answer is fumble charts that aren't stupid, not getting rid of fumble charts.
Using the special critical hit and fumble charts from The Dragon #39 has never cost my PC the fight. Mostly it just complicates the fight. And once it unambiguously won us the fight. [The DM later told us that he wasn't going to have the BBEG kill us, but my lucky strike prevented him from delivering his big speech.]
Then those are bad tables. That doesn't prove that all fumble tables are bad.
If I had your experiences, I would probably agree with you. But I have used reasonable special critical hit and fumble tables, and have had great times.Last edited by Jay R; 2019-09-23 at 08:35 PM.
-
2019-09-23, 09:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
-
2019-09-23, 09:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Collegeville, PA
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
Just curious, but why is your anecdotal evidence any more valid than mine?
And regardless of how much fun you might have (accidentally) had the math is not on the side of the players when critical fumbles are in play. Over the course of the campaign they will statistically harm the PC's far more than they harm the enemies.Resident Mad Scientist...
"It's so cool!"
Spoiler: ContestsVC I: Lord Commander Conrad Vayne, 1st place
VC II: Lorna, the Mother's Wrath, 5th place
VC XV: Tosk, Kursak the Marauder, Vierna Zalyl; 1st place, 6th/7th place
Kitchen Crashers Protocol for Peace
-
2019-09-24, 12:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
Re: Fumbles
Should have taken 10.
(Though yes, I agree. It's poorly conceived. Even with judicious use of Take 10, in combat this still leads to [master acrobats] faceplanting on any floors that are not smoothed out to professional standards [flagstone, rough hewn floor, slight slopes, etc.], and failing really obvious Listen checks like someone speaking right next to you. )
-
2019-09-24, 06:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- Eastern PA
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
-
2019-09-24, 07:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- South Africa
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
I like fumbles because of my philosophy of "conflict is chaos" and the idea that it's fun to unexpectedly have things go badly sometimes.
There are two problems:
1. People often like to play as powerful people and don't like being forced to have their characters make stupid mistakes. This is a taste issue. Personally, I consider that part of the fun.
2. It widens the gap between melee and casters. Though this is fixable. Firstly, you can only fumble on the first roll of a round (high BAB doesn't screw you over) and secondly, you always have to roll to cast a spell (a fumble causes you to lose the spell AND zap yourself for damage scaling by spell level). That means casters can't avoid the consequences of fumbles.The Good Cat Mistress shall show mercy to her servants
My Homebrew
SpoilerRace
Wiggles
Monsters
Cold iron dragon
Argent dragon
Base Class
Glowherd
Silly stuff
Acid classes (as inspired by DracoDei)
Keeper of the Fourth Gate (PrC)
Competitions
Afroakuma's Giantitp Villain Competition
Other
Sereg's Alternative Pronunciation Guide System
Competitions that I've Currently Entered: Lord Gareth's The Alter of Naught Base Class Challenge
-
2019-09-24, 10:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: Fumbles
All the anecdotal evidence is equally good. My logic is more valid than yours because it is supported by all the anecdotal evidence, not just some of it.
You wrote, "No one ever rolls to confirm a critical failure (at least not at any table I have played at)."
This anecdotal evidence is perfectly good to describe your tables. But my anecdotal evidence shows that it cannot be generalized to all other tables. Hence my conclusion, "If I had your experiences, I would probably agree with you. But I have used reasonable special critical hit and fumble tables, and have had great times."
On the subject of whether fumble tables can ever work in a game, your anecdotal evidence shows that what you did worked badly. My anecdotal evidence shows that what I do works well.
My conclusion that it can work well or badly depending on implementation is supported by your anecdotal evidence as much as by mine. Your conclusion that it is always bad is disproven by mine.
First of all, so what? Living dangerously is the point of an adventure game. The way for a PC to avoid harm is to stay home. But nobody wants to play Hovels and Housework.
I have said it several times in my post. I will now say it so directly that you cannot deny that I have said it. I play with special critical hits and critical fumbles. I agree with you that adding critical fumbles without special critical hits is a net tactical loss for the PCs. [I also don't care, but that's a different issue.]
But that's not what I'm defending. I'm defending a system in which special critical hits add more than critical fumbles take away. By the exact same logic that you are using, this is a net gain for the PCs, and especially a net gain for the martial characters.
[I agree that fumble tables with instant kills are horrible. I don't do that, and I'm not defending that. A good fumble table should add complications and suspense, not random death.]
The tables I use are from The Dragon #39. More than half of the fumble results are a DEX roll to prevent a fall, dropped weapon, lost action, or the like. This is not a huge penalty even when you fail the roll. Many of the others are an automatic penalty of the same basic level. Actually doing damage to oneself or an ally is pretty rare (16% of fumbles, which are only 5% of all misses), and never overwhelming. Meanwhile, the additional crit damage from the special crit table is quite helpful.
In over 40 years, I've only had two PCs die, and neither of them came from a critical fumble.
I've certainly lost fights -- fleeing, being captured, etc. But I would have a lot less fun in a game I could never lose, so I reject your notion that making it possible for PCs to lose encounters makes all the fun "accidental".
A good fumble table should add the occasional extra moment of suspense, and occasional setbacks to overcome.
"Accidentally"? Accidents don't last over forty years.
Have fun your way, and that's great. But please recognize that there is not only one way, and that disagreeing with you does not make my fun accidental.
Have your fun, purposely using what you have made work, and I will have mine, purposely using what my DMs and I have made work.