New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 29 of 29
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Lightbulb Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Looking for some suggestions for a character that I'll be playing this evening in a new 3.5e game. Kind of want to play a melee build of some sort. Been a while since I've hit things with a big stick.

    My stats are kind of rediculous. 18 18 16 16 15 12

    Any official book is acceptable, though I won't have access to any books until I get to the game tonight.

    In this campaign we have one restriction, there are only spontaneous spell casters.

    Since I wanted to beat people with a big stick, I went ahead and Okay'd playing a Mul from the Dark Sun campaign setting, using the conversion provided by www.athas.org found here: The Burnt World of Athas (DS3_R7.pdf)

    This basically gives me +4 Strength, +2 Con, -2 Cha, Darkvision, for +1LA. We're starting at level 4, so I'll buy off the LA at level 3. Basically Muls are super-dwarves, and classify as a dwarf for all intents and purposes.

    I just can't decide what I want to do with it. So far there's a barbarian, a druid, a warblade, and a scout in the party.

    I'd be grateful of any prospective write-ups anyone can suggest. I'm having a massive mind-blank for this character and I can't shake it.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    I would have said Binder if it wasn't for the Charisma penalty, and there's allready a Warblade in your group. So I'll suggest either the Incarnate, Totemist, or Duskblade. Though a Binder can still work great, seeing as you have rediculous stats.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Flickerdart's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    With those insane stats you might get good mileage out of a Paladin. 18 STR, 18 CHA, 16 WIS and CON, 15 INT and 12 DEX makes a rather shiny knight. Jump into a PrC as early as you can, since there's nothing for Paladins beyond 6th level. Alternately, the UA Prestige Paladin variant entered through a UA Spontaneous Casting variant Cleric (since there are no prepared casters in your world) gets better casting and needs to spend fewer levels for Paladin goodies, even if your mount will be a lower level.
    Quote Originally Posted by Inevitability View Post
    Greater
    \ˈgrā-tər \
    comparative adjective
    1. Describing basically the exact same monster but with twice the RHD.
    Quote Originally Posted by Artanis View Post
    I'm going to be honest, "the Welsh became a Great Power and conquered Germany" is almost exactly the opposite of the explanation I was expecting

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Flickerdart View Post
    With those insane stats you might get good mileage out of a Paladin. 18 STR, 18 CHA, 16 WIS and CON, 15 INT and 12 DEX makes a rather shiny knight. Jump into a PrC as early as you can, since there's nothing for Paladins beyond 6th level. Alternately, the UA Prestige Paladin variant entered through a UA Spontaneous Casting variant Cleric (since there are no prepared casters in your world) gets better casting and needs to spend fewer levels for Paladin goodies, even if your mount will be a lower level.
    Instead of pumping charisma he's better off taking the Serenity feat from Dragon Compendium, basing all paladin abilities off of wisdom. I wouldn't play a paladin either way though, but if you do... Serenity(Dragon Magazine Compendium) and Battle Blessing(Complete Champion) are a must for you.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Flickerdart's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Dragon Mag isn't a "book" as such, so it might not be allowed, and with monster stats like that he has better things to do with his feats.
    Quote Originally Posted by Inevitability View Post
    Greater
    \ˈgrā-tər \
    comparative adjective
    1. Describing basically the exact same monster but with twice the RHD.
    Quote Originally Posted by Artanis View Post
    I'm going to be honest, "the Welsh became a Great Power and conquered Germany" is almost exactly the opposite of the explanation I was expecting

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Flickerdart View Post
    Dragon Mag isn't a "book" as such, so it might not be allowed, and with monster stats like that he has better things to do with his feats.
    Dragon Magazine Compendium is a book, actualy.

    And no, basing everything off of wisdom makes him less mad as well as granting some additional power, seeing as wisdom is better then charisma in about everything. 18 Str, 18 Wis, 16 con, 16 int, 15 dex, 12 charisma. Also; Battle Blessing is a must for paladins. But I'll say it again; play something other then a paladin, like a totemist or incarnate.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    +1 for playing an Incarnate. They're kind of like Bards in that they don't need high stats (I once played one without anything higher than a 14 and did just fine), but they're able to benefit from all of them.

    Well, or a Bard, I guess. Bards are cool, but yeah, they're not so much the "hit with a big stick" types. They're more "hit with a little stick and have it hurt WAY MORE THAN IT SHOULD" types.
    In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Gentlefolk, learn from Zaq's example, and his suffering. Remember, seven out of eleven players who use truenamer lose their ability to taste ice cream.
    My compiled Iron Chef stuff!

    ~ Gay all day, queer all year ~

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Conundrums.

    I'll be honest... I don't like paladins. And unfortunately, I don't think we have a Magic of Incarnum book.

    I hate making last minute characters. Everyone always beats me to the roles I like to play. :)

    Edit: Apparently there's another player I was unaware of... A spontaneous cleric. Hrmph.
    Last edited by Jorlain; 2010-05-29 at 11:46 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    Conundrums.

    I'll be honest... I don't like paladins. And unfortunately, I don't think we have a Magic of Incarnum book.

    I hate making last minute characters. Everyone always beats me to the roles I like to play. :)

    Edit: Apparently there's another player I was unaware of... A spontaneous cleric. Hrmph.
    Ohhhh, so your DM allows the spontaneous divine casting variant? How do you feel about druids? And the PH2 Shapeshifter variant? Will be weaker then a regular druid, but that's a good thing. You get high stats so Shapeshifter variant might actualy be better.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Banned
     
    true_shinken's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Dungeoncrasher Fighter. Use your big stick to ping-pong your enemies.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Escheton's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Netherlands

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Dragon shaman, dragon shaman, dragon shaman.

    Halfling or gnome, or that superdwarf, but halfling or gnome is more fun.

    Be all about the power, THE UNLIMITED POWER!!!

    Get lotsa con so you never really need more then half your hp. (vigor)
    Deal bonus damage against anyone daring to hit you and your allies (energy shield)
    well, thats about it, the other aura's suck. Though 5 or 6 lvls are pretty damned sweet.

    Just be more badass then the warblade, cleric and rest of them combined. As a small char.

    Get a crusaderlvl at lvl 5 or 8 for second or 3rd lvl maneuvers and stances that complement your awesome dragon-y power.

    Dip a totemist lvl around that time as well. Not sure what to do past lvl 8 though. But there has got to be some prestigeclass that adds to the awesomeness.
    Last edited by Escheton; 2010-05-29 at 12:22 PM.
    "Quick Draw. It grants the ability to turn any boring non-combat scenario into combat as a FREE ACTION."-Deleted User

    Handy links:

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Escheton View Post
    Dragon shaman, dragon shaman, dragon shaman.

    Halfling or gnome, or that superdwarf, but halfling or gnome is more fun.

    Be all about the power, THE UNLIMITED POWER!!!

    Get lotsa con so you never really need more then half your hp. (vigor)
    Deal bonus damage against anyone daring to hit you and your allies (energy shield)
    well, thats about it, the other aura's suck. Though 5 or 6 lvls are pretty damned sweet.

    Just be more badass then the warblade, cleric and rest of them combined. As a small char.

    Get a crusaderlvl at lvl 5 or 8 for second or 3rd lvl maneuvers and stances that complement your awesome dragon-y power.

    Dip a totemist lvl around that time as well. Not sure what to do past lvl 8 though. But there has got to be some prestigeclass that adds to the awesomeness.
    Dragon shaman is a sub-par class which relies on charisma for his touch of vitality ability. He doesn't have MoI available. Playing a crusader -can- work, but a binder would give him more flavor. Oh, and binder.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Escheton View Post
    Just be more badass then the warblade, cleric and rest of them combined. As a small char.
    Dragon shaman is just a weak Dragonfire Adept.

    Anyway, if you're ok with +1 LA, how about using an official 3.5 race? Namely, goliath: +4 strength, +2 con, -2 dex. Powerful Build (and always counts as running for jump checks).
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenish View Post
    Dragon shaman is just a weak Dragonfire Adept.

    Anyway, if you're ok with +1 LA, how about using an official 3.5 race? Namely, goliath: +4 strength, +2 con, -2 dex. Powerful Build (and always counts as running for jump checks).
    I second this idea, will make some options quite a bit stronger, like the Crusader and Binder. But aside from that it would be nice to hear- Wait, why haven't I mentioned the Psychic Warrior yet? You know what, I'll do it now:

    Psychic Warrior!
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Never done a psionic class before. That might be interesting. I was always under the impression, though, that psi warriors were sub-par. They sound interesting, though.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    Never done a psionic class before. That might be interesting. I was always under the impression, though, that psi warriors were sub-par. They sound interesting, though.
    Psychic warriors are solid tier 3, on par with ToB classes and miles ahead of fighters, monks, rogue, barbarians and their ilk.

    [Edit]: Psywar can grapple the tarrasque!
    Last edited by Greenish; 2010-05-29 at 02:41 PM.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Psychic Warrior it is!

    Being that I've never played one, happen to have any advice? Our DM doesn't impose penalties for multi-classing, though I try not to go much beyond 2 base classes, as things tend to get too muddy and it takes away the fun (for me, anyways).

    Thanks for the help so far! I'm kind of excited now. :)

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    Psychic Warrior it is!

    Being that I've never played one, happen to have any advice? Our DM doesn't impose penalties for multi-classing, though I try not to go much beyond 2 base classes, as things tend to get too muddy and it takes away the fun (for me, anyways).

    Thanks for the help so far! I'm kind of excited now. :)
    Psywar build compendium. You can build one to make many things, so maybe tell us what you would like to do?
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    I'm gunning for a Two-handed melee character, that doesn't lose usefulness after level 6.

    Full BAB would make me happy, but 3/4 BAB can be made to be good enough providing the abilities compensate.

    Psychic Warrior sounds awesome, but the guys I play with are kind of elite character builders. It's tough to keep up with them. I don't want to have a useless character because I didn't have the knowledge to make the character correctly. Of course, then I'd be able to make a new one if he died, though. :)

    I guess what I mean, is that I'd like a (mostly) pure damage character for this game. If you can think of something that isn't overly complex that you think might work out for me, great!

    Hah, I sound like such a putz. :)

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    I'm gunning for a Two-handed melee character, that doesn't lose usefulness after level 6.

    Full BAB would make me happy, but 3/4 BAB can be made to be good enough providing the abilities compensate.

    Psychic Warrior sounds awesome, but the guys I play with are kind of elite character builders. It's tough to keep up with them. I don't want to have a useless character because I didn't have the knowledge to make the character correctly. Of course, then I'd be able to make a new one if he died, though. :)

    I guess what I mean, is that I'd like a (mostly) pure damage character for this game. If you can think of something that isn't overly complex that you think might work out for me, great!

    Hah, I sound like such a putz. :)
    No, it's great that you tell us what you want, as long as that's clear we can scour any books we want!

    A simple pure damage character is a barbarian, though a Duskblade is even better, as well as giving more choices. Psychic Warriors are fun to play, you just need to know when to use your powers and which to choose, other then that they're quite simple.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Maybe I'm focusing too much on hitting things with a big stick and should drop the Mul idea.

    I mean, we don't have any arcane casters at all... I'm kind of loathe to play a Sorceror, though. Not a big fan of bards, either...

    Are there any decent spontaneous summoner builds? Might be fun to summon hordes of monsters, elementals, et cetera... Especially if I could get my hands on some battlefield control, too.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    Maybe I'm focusing too much on hitting things with a big stick and should drop the Mul idea.

    I mean, we don't have any arcane casters at all... I'm kind of loathe to play a Sorceror, though. Not a big fan of bards, either...

    Are there any decent spontaneous summoner builds? Might be fun to summon hordes of monsters, elementals, et cetera... Especially if I could get my hands on some battlefield control, too.
    A Psion Shaper has exactly what you want!

    Oh, and you might want to look at this: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/frcc/20070718

    Play a binder!
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorlain View Post
    Are there any decent spontaneous summoner builds? Might be fun to summon hordes of monsters, elementals, et cetera... Especially if I could get my hands on some battlefield control, too.
    Druids get spontaneous summons from a decent list and some rather effective battlefield control. Spirit Shamans are spontaneous casters with druid spell list, and they get to select their spells known every day.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    What book do binders come out of?

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Tome of Magic, it also has Shadowcasters and Truenamers. Shadowcasters can be fun with any of the various fixes and the truenamer is broken(broken as in it doesn't work, and overpowered when it does).
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Banned
     
    true_shinken's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Well, is you drop the mul thing, you could play a Factotum.
    Large parties also benefit the most from classes like Bard, Dragon Shaman and Marshall.
    Since you guys don't have an arcane caster and you want to hit things, I second the Duskblade suggestion, though.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    gallagher's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Some corn field
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    i would actually be a shapeshift druid, its an ACF or a cleric, go for either divine might/righteous wrath path for cleric, or the shapeshift druid ACF. then you can break the house down
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by 3SecondCultist View Post
    ...

    You're just going to start randomly setting things on fire, aren't you?
    Quote Originally Posted by TechnoScrabble View Post
    ...

    This entire campaign's going to become nothing but partying in a long forgotten world, isn't it?
    In the past, I played Sir Theo Roost.
    I am soon to begin playing his heir, Dora the Destroya

    Avatar by Szilard

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by gallagher View Post
    i would actually be a shapeshift druid, its an ACF or a cleric, go for either divine might/righteous wrath path for cleric, or the shapeshift druid ACF. then you can break the house down
    Well, without the shapeshift variant you can break down Tokyo.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Suggestions for Build [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenish View Post
    Well, without the shapeshift variant you can break down Tokyo.
    Yeah, but he's only level 3 when he starts, so he can have a strength score of 26 with the Shapeshift variant, though I think Mul's get +2 Strength/+4 con instead though, not 4/2.
    Please read and evaluate the changes I'm trying to smooth out in this thread: http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154036

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •