Results 481 to 510 of 3609
Thread: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
-
2012-12-20, 08:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- <<Undetected>>
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A261: (correction) No.
Originally Posted by SRDOriginally Posted by SRDLast edited by mattie_p; 2012-12-20 at 08:32 AM.
Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)
Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.
-
2012-12-20, 09:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Stillwater
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A262
No.
In the case of a morningstar vs a Black Pudding:
Originally Posted by TypeOriginally Posted by Split
-
2012-12-20, 09:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q263
Is "unarmed strike" considered a melee weapon for the purposes of the Snap Kick feat (Tome of Battle)? In other words, can you US and then US again (doing less damage on the second one, unless your strength bonus is 0 or less), or do you have to use a manufactured weapon first and then a Snap Kick?
-
2012-12-20, 09:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Stillwater
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A263
No, an unarmed strike is considered a simple unarmed attack, not a melee weapon, according to Table: Weapons. You would have to use another weapon.
-
2012-12-20, 10:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q264
If I take a substitution level for a certain class, need I take every level of that progression?
For example, if I take the first level of the Elf Paladin substitution levels (Races of the Wild), do I need to take the next levels at Paladin levels 3 and 5?
Is it diferent for non-racial substitution levels?
-
2012-12-20, 10:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Stillwater
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A264
No, you don't have to take every racial substitution level, per p106 of Races of the Dragon. Same with other substitution levels, according to Champions of Valor.
-
2012-12-20, 12:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- <<Undetected>>
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q265: My concern is not the immunity, but the fact that it appears any slashing or piercing weapon causes them to split. I guess what I am asking is would the morningstar deal normal bludgeoning damage, then cause it to split due to the piercing damage?
To use the same quotes you cited:
Originally Posted by TypeOriginally Posted by SplitBlank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)
Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.
-
2012-12-20, 12:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- On Paper
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q266: Does the Bonus HD from being an Animal Companion cause an Animal to increase in size, gaining the associated bonuses to strength, AC, natural weapon, ect that it would had it just been a monster with advanced HD?
-
2012-12-20, 01:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 266
No, the animal companion does not increase in size when gaining the bonus hit dices for being an animal companion.
-
2012-12-20, 01:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q267
The Leadership Feat: Does it let the player have ANY of the NPC classes? Inc Adapts?"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff."
The First Rule of Thesaurus Club is: You do not Talk, converse, chat, speak, gossip, chatter, natter, utter, discuss, confer, reason, deliberate, consult, parley, lecture, sermon about Thesaurus Club!
-
2012-12-20, 01:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 267
Yes. NPC classes are still classes. They are only specially noted as being NPC classes because they are supposed to be weaker than classes intended for players.
-
2012-12-20, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q268
Will pounce give you all itterary attacks itterary off hand attacks from twf feats and all natural attacks obviusly not used in weapon attacks?Last edited by Yomega; 2012-12-20 at 02:02 PM.
-
2012-12-20, 02:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 263 [correction] Yes.
The distinction used in Snap Kick is between ranged and melee weapon attacks. An unarmed strike, for categorization purposes, is treated as a light melee weapon.An unarmed strike is always considered a light weapon.
A 268 Yes.
Pounce will let you execute all the attacks which the full attack action allows.Last edited by Curmudgeon; 2012-12-20 at 02:57 PM.
-
2012-12-20, 05:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Tacoma, WA
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q 269
I am a level 3 Cleric. I cast Spiritual Weapon. The spell attacks once in the round it appears, and lasts 3 rounds. How many total attacks can it make? Three, or four?I will NOT succumb to evil!...Unless she's cute._____________
Avatar by Miss Nobody
-
2012-12-20, 05:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q 270
Quoting a piece of the Vow of Peace, from Book of Exalted Deeds:
" If a creature strikes you with a manufactured weapon, the weapon must immediately make a successful Fortitude save (DC 10 + one-half your character level + your Con modifier) or shatter against your skin, leaving you unharmed."
What if someone shot a arrow at me? The bow or the arrow makes the save?
-
2012-12-20, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 269
3. The weapon exists for three rounds, the first round is from the casting of the spell to right before the caster gets to act again. In each round it gets to attack once.
A 270
Unfortunately the pacifist can be safely shot. The only thing that touches him is a (manufactured) projectile not a weapon. The feat does nothing against those. A thrown weapon on the other hand would shatter.
-
2012-12-20, 06:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Stillwater
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A265
No, because of "instead" in the Split text. It's either/or with Split, and since the Ooze is not immune to both B/P, it doesn't get the option to ignore the damage and instead split.
-
2012-12-20, 09:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Canada apparently
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
there's an enhancement i wish to use on a hide armor called "beastskin". the cost for it is +2 bonus, what does that mean?
Avatar by Ceika, she's awesome, she deserves your cookies.
old avatar
Spoiler
-
2012-12-20, 09:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- <<Undetected>>
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 271: A +2 armor enhancement means that it costs the equivalent of a +2 added to magic armor. In order to add a special ability such as beastskin, the armor must already be enhanced to +1. If you are adding beastskin to +1 armor, then it costs 8000 gp (9000gp - 1000 gp per the table), or costs more if the armor already has more than a +1 (or equivalent) enchantment.
Last edited by mattie_p; 2012-12-20 at 09:59 PM.
Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)
Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.
-
2012-12-20, 10:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q272
The SRD gives a spot DC of 20 to notice an active invisible creature in a "there's something over there" kind of way and says a listen check (opposed by the invisible creature's move silently check) gives a similar "over there somewhere" result. Are there any rules that would modify this if the "active invisible creature" were flying rather than walking (assume the creature's a janni with perfect maneuverability so there's no flapping wings to hear or anything like that), or is that something a DM would handle case-by-base through circumstance bonuses and penalties?Last edited by Lord Il Palazzo; 2012-12-20 at 10:10 PM. Reason: adjusted number from 271
-
2012-12-20, 10:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- <<Undetected>>
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 272: No.
Perfect: The creature can perform almost any aerial maneuver it wishes. It moves through the air as well as a human moves over smooth ground.Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)
Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.
-
2012-12-21, 01:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q 219 Repeat
How does magic and psionic interact in Faerûn? The Player's Guide to Faerûn says there is no magic-psionic-transparency, but then lists examples of how magic does interact with psionic effects, and then states that psionic interacts exactly like magic interacts with other magic.
Which is it now?
-
2012-12-21, 06:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Lands of Noobaria
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q273
What is the formula for spell casting?
-
2012-12-21, 06:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.
Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity
-
2012-12-21, 06:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Lands of Noobaria
- Gender
-
2012-12-21, 06:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A273 Oh. Caster level checks (used for spell penetration, dispels, and a couple other things) are caster level + 1d20 + feats or items. Usually caster level is the same as the class level of the relevant spellcaster class, and there are various feats and items that boost caster level for spell penetration purposes (such as [Greater] Spell Penetration) or for all purposes (such as an orange prism ioun stone). So a Wizard 6 with Spell Penetration shooting a fireball at a babau would roll 1d20+8 against SR 14: a 6 or higher on the die will succeed, so 75% chance. Against an achaierai, SR 19, he would only have a 50% chance of affecting it.
Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.
Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity
-
2012-12-21, 09:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Lands of Noobaria
- Gender
-
2012-12-21, 09:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Only if the spell requires an attack roll. The attack roll you make will be as normal (BAB + Strength for melee or Dexterity for ranged attacks) unless specifically noted otherwise in the spell's description. Spells that use attack rolls are usually rolled against the target's touch AC.
-
2012-12-21, 11:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
Q 274
Can a Half-elf take the Able Learner feat?
Q 275
I have a classic reach weapon, I threat distant enemies but can't attack an adjacent one. If the enemy walk over the threatened square coming toward me for a melee attack, does he provoke an attack of opportunity?
-
2012-12-21, 11:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII
A 275
Yes.
Q 276
Can a Wall of Chains (BoVD) be conjured in an open field?
Q 277
Can the Steeldance spell (SpC) target weapons being held by enemies?