Results 91 to 120 of 275
Thread: Worf vs Solo
-
2014-06-30, 10:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- right behind you
Re: Worf vs Solo
I think we basically claimed physically they would be a good match for each other. Worf too is bigger stronger and heavier than a human. I admit to not knowing the exact difference but its there. On an unrelated note, can someone tell me the name of the ds9 episode where worf is captured and forced to fight jemhadar one on one, and proceeds to kick so much ass the jem hadar themselves respect him?
"Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum"
Translation: "Sometimes I get this urge to conquer large parts of Europe."
"If you don't get those cameras out of my face, I'm gonna go 8.6 on the Richter scale with gastric emissions that'll clear this room."
-
2014-06-30, 10:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
That was "By Inferno's Light."
Questions:
--Can the sensors on a Star Wars ship detect something coming toward them at a speed faster than light?
--Can the Millennium Falcon have any hope of seeing a quantum torpedo heading right for it at warp speed, or have any hope of escape?
--Has Han Solo ever heard of the Picard Maneuver?Last edited by Kislath; 2014-06-30 at 10:35 AM.
-
2014-06-30, 11:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Worf vs Solo
Assuming they don't drop out of hyperspace until reaching port with their cargo, the first two might not apply. Also, is a quantum torpedo used to subdue? Unless Worf has dead-or-alive orders, I don't think his opening salvo will be meant to kill.
The third? Solo, in universe, was a skilled pilot even before receiving military training. He then spent the rest of his life getting better at piloting. I'm going to guess he's familiar with just about every way to handle a starfight, and possibly has invented more maneuvers than Picard.
-
2014-06-30, 11:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
Unknown, nothing in Hyperspace moves as slowly as a Star Trek ship.
--Can the Millennium Falcon have any hope of seeing a quantum torpedo heading right for it at warp speed, or have any hope of escape?
--Has Han Solo ever heard of the Picard Maneuver?
Really, stop trying, even based on only movie canon the Defiant attempting to engage even a jumped up smuggling freighter like the Falcon is like you trying to take on an APC with a nerf gun. Worf can try all the clever tactics he likes, he's still only got a nerf gun.
-
2014-06-30, 11:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
You mean Star Wars values, right? The Star Trek manual, reportedly, was actually used as a sort of tech bible for the first four of its movies. It's Incredible Cross-Sections that gets the flack for being wildly disparate to visual movie evidence.
A bomb that can make a star nova is a pretty impressive thing.NOW COMPLETE: Let's Play Starcraft II Trilogy:
Hell, It's About Time: Wings of Liberty
Does This Mutation Make Me Look Fat: Heart of the Swarm
My Life For Aiur? I Barely Know 'Er: Legacy of the Void
-
2014-06-30, 11:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
That too. Though the ICS books were also used as a reference in episodes 2 and 3.
But the Star Trek technical manuals also give figures well above what's ever shown to happen on screen. Between them the TNG and DS9 ones give torpedoes of that era up to 1.5kg antimatter warhead and 78% peak efficiency, for a maximum energy yield just under 50 megatons (actually around 48) but the effects shown on screen whenever they are used, plus their effects on easily predictable things like asteroids, demonstrate far lower yield than that, even when using maximum yield would seem to be most sensible. In Pegasus it's stated that the Enterprise would have to use "almost all" of its complement of 275 torpedoes to destroy an asteroid around 5km wide, which based on its volume and likely composition would take roughly 125Mt to completely pulverise and around 30 to shatter. Which puts the actual demonstrable yield of a photon torpedo roughly in the 100-400 kiloton range.
I'm fairly sure Hutts fart louder than that.
-
2014-06-30, 12:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- right behind you
Re: Worf vs Solo
Thanks, im a fan of that episode.
"Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum"
Translation: "Sometimes I get this urge to conquer large parts of Europe."
"If you don't get those cameras out of my face, I'm gonna go 8.6 on the Richter scale with gastric emissions that'll clear this room."
-
2014-06-30, 07:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Worf vs Solo
Not to mention he had it with him on a shuttle. Given how easy it is to blow stars up in Star Trek, if they went evil nova bombs like in Andromeda are simple for them. It is harder to stabilize a sun, as seen in the episode with the race that suicides at 60. Plus Enterprise shields can go into the corona of a star I think. Not sure how long they can stay there. And in Voyager pilot did they not say that the 2 quantum torps they used on the array ripped a hole in subspace?
No way Worf could or would do it, but I think a pack of star destroyers would have a hard time surviving a Genesis torpedo near them. Cloaked mines existed in DS9, so cloaked torpedoes should be fairly easy.
>Except none of those things are actually true? I mean really, have you seen the shows or movies? Star Trek ships are invariably slower and less mobile than their Star Wars counterparts (as well as being smaller and less well armed).
Yes I have, and in the movies and the series blowing up a sun was not in any way some kind of super feat. Sure ship on ship ST loses, but they DO have the ability to take out whole star systems with single shots just they will not do it. No special superweapon needed.
>I've never heard anyone claim the Federation could destroy a star with sheer firepower.
Then you need to watch the shows. Not sheer firepower, a single or duo of torpedoes.
-
2014-06-30, 10:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
Re: Worf vs Solo
They have one substance that when correctly configured in an explosive, can take out a star by exploiting its effects on nuclear fusion. The ones that made it look easy were an evil genius and a Changeling, while the Romulans had problems stabilizing the substance. Although the material is apparently quite easily bred in a standard warp core, it doesn't seem like the weapon is "simple" except for beings that are more advanced than the Federation.
The Enterprise-D could, for a few minutes, and only after modifications, as seen in "Descent, Part II." The ability to do so was new at the time, since the metaphasic shield that allowed it was first seen in "Suspicions."
Tricobalt weapons, not quantum.
-
2014-07-01, 12:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Worf vs Solo
They also blew a sun up by accident trying to stabilize it. Sure it was unstable but still they play with stars far too easily. And the shield mods that allow it should be common since it happened before DS9 and Defiant was built. SW is bigger by far and a larger scale but ST advances more and faster, adapts better...for the most part.
-
2014-07-01, 06:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- The Battlefield
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
The problem with comparison, I think, is that both Star Wars and Star Trek are, at least to some degree, inconsistent in the tech level they apply due to a great many different writers with differing understandings having dabbled with both series (this is one of the things I utterly detest about multi-writer projects in science fiction).
For those in the Star Trek camp who have difficulty with the idea that a modified freighter could outfight a dedicated capital ship, I offer an alternative scenario:
Fast forward to three years after the battle of Endor, Han is now in command of the Mon Remonda a top of the line Star Cruiser- and considering that Star Wars capital ships don't tend to the have the same paucity of firepower on their flanks that their trek equivalents seem to have (seriously, phasers are supposed to be omnidirectional, but they almost always seem to engage targets in their forward or aft fire arcs) I doubt the defiant (or even the Enterprise-E) has much chance in a stand up fight.Part of YugiohITPAvatar by Smuchmuch
Warning: This post may contain traces of nuts, madness and/or sarcasm, you have been warned.
-
2014-07-01, 07:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
You guys are crazy. Worf would win. Eventually, Worf would win. He does not fail. He is Worf.
I think the very notion of The Falcon or even a Star Destroyer surviving a fight with the Defiant, a ship loaded up with weapons capable of tearing apart the very fabric of space, is sheer lunacy, but putting that aside, one day, Solo is going to land someplace. When that happened, he would be a sitting duck. His ship, powered down and defenseless, would be crippled with one phaser pulse. The Defiant's sensors are more than capable of spotting Solo even on a world full of humans, let alone a world full of aliens, and in the blink of an eye, Solo would be beamed to the brig.
-
2014-07-01, 08:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Re: Worf vs Solo
You guys are crazy. Worf would win. Eventually, Worf would win. He does not fail. He is Worf.
I think the very notion of The Falcon or even a Star Destroyer surviving a fight with the Defiant, a ship loaded up with weapons capable of tearing apart the very fabric of space, is sheer lunacy, but putting that aside, one day, Solo is going to land someplace. When that happened, he would be a sitting duck. His ship, powered down and defenseless, would be crippled with one phaser pulse. The Defiant's sensors are more than capable of spotting Solo even on a world full of humans, let alone a world full of aliens, and in the blink of an eye, Solo would be beamed to the brig.
In the scenario you describe with Worf one day beaming Solo up from some random planet Worf had already lost the contest, as he had by then failed to stop Solo from delivering his cargo, if he then turns out to afterward be a sore loser and kidnap Solo, then it still dont change the outcome.
And we have already determined that the difference in techlevel means Worf is a native in a cano trying to stop an armed freigh hauler with his bow. He would newer even get close enough to show Solo his weapons were ineffective.thnx to Starwoof for the fine avatar
-
2014-07-01, 08:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Wisconsin, USA
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
Star Trek technology makes a slight swipe at being advanced.
Star Wars tech is riddled with idiotically primitive stuff. Laser cannons that eject spent cartridges, lasers that only work if they look like a crossbow, interstellar space ships that apparently have gas tanks (see Obi Wan and Anakin escaping at the start of Episode III), energy bolts so slow that a guy with a laser stick can deflect them like he's playing baseball.
So, I nominate Star Trek to win on the basis of its pretend-tech being marginally less dumb.Last edited by Bulldog Psion; 2014-07-01 at 08:22 AM.
Spoiler
So the song runs on, with shift and change,
Through the years that have no name,
And the late notes soar to a higher range,
But the theme is still the same.
Man's battle-cry and the guns' reply
Blend in with the old, old rhyme
That was traced in the score of the strata marks
While millenniums winked like campfire sparks
Down the winds of unguessed time. -- 4th Stanza, The Bad Lands, Badger Clark
-
2014-07-01, 08:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
-
2014-07-01, 08:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Gender
-
2014-07-01, 08:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- right behind you
Re: Worf vs Solo
BWR has a good point. Remember the grand falcon escape from Hoth? Half the damn ship wasnt assembled properly, A freaking droid fell into the circuitry, and instead of a massive plasma explosion, he just got tangled up in the wires. If that had been star trek, c3po would have been melted into slag, and at least 15 eps relay conduits would have erupted into sparklers like its the 4th of july. Directly into the faces of everyone in the cockpit. I keep hoping that someday Star Trek ship builders will stop using c-4 as wire insulation, but it hasnt happened yet.
"Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum"
Translation: "Sometimes I get this urge to conquer large parts of Europe."
"If you don't get those cameras out of my face, I'm gonna go 8.6 on the Richter scale with gastric emissions that'll clear this room."
-
2014-07-01, 08:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
Command consoles are, apparently, cheaper than fuses in the 23rd century.
-
2014-07-01, 09:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Wisconsin, USA
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
Spoiler
So the song runs on, with shift and change,
Through the years that have no name,
And the late notes soar to a higher range,
But the theme is still the same.
Man's battle-cry and the guns' reply
Blend in with the old, old rhyme
That was traced in the score of the strata marks
While millenniums winked like campfire sparks
Down the winds of unguessed time. -- 4th Stanza, The Bad Lands, Badger Clark
-
2014-07-01, 09:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
-
2014-07-01, 10:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Worf vs Solo
I never understood why Starfleet went over to touch-screens for all of their controls. Maybe I don't understand modern military/exploration mindsets, but it seems like a panel you can work with your eyes closed would function more efficiently.
I have a touch-screen in my car. I hate having to take my eyes off the road long enough to simply adjust the thermostat. I can only imagine what it's like during epic space combat.
Unless the tech manuals have described some sort of haptic/tactile feedback, I suppose. Wouldn't know.
But shoot, I forgot about ST sensor technology. If they could pick Solo's life readings out of a massive crowd of similar humans, then Worf would never set an ambush. He would just beam him into the brig. After all, even if he can't stop the delivery, Solo would still be a wanted criminal. Worf wouldn't walk away from that.
So that would be a big no on the isolated jungle combat scenario. Unless the jungle itself would interfere with either the transporter or sensor readings. Which I believe has happened before.
-
2014-07-01, 10:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
-
2014-07-01, 10:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- right behind you
Re: Worf vs Solo
Or scanning for the falcon, then beaming out whatever leaves the ship after it lands. Anyone on board the vessel is at best an accomplice, due to the fact that he is hardly secretive of the fact that he is a smuggler. So beam up everything that moves, then beam down whatever he doesnt want to keep. Or, go at it assassins creed style. Han is wandering around Mos Eisly, one of the many hooded strangers in the area walks by him, tags him with a com device, and boom, two to beam up.
"Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum"
Translation: "Sometimes I get this urge to conquer large parts of Europe."
"If you don't get those cameras out of my face, I'm gonna go 8.6 on the Richter scale with gastric emissions that'll clear this room."
-
2014-07-01, 11:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
-
2014-07-01, 11:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- NYC
- Gender
-
2014-07-01, 11:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
-
2014-07-01, 12:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- NYC
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
Make the exhaust pipe kinked, so that a torpedo can't make it straight into the reactor? Have multiple smaller exhausts, or a grate that stops large objects but lets gas through? Place dedicated point defense/chaff systems on your station's one weakness? Just a thought.
Last edited by Flickerdart; 2014-07-01 at 12:04 PM.
-
2014-07-01, 12:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Gender
Re: Worf vs Solo
I'm fairly sure that if you build a computer system which is, even at a theoretical level, capable of causing your spaceship to threaten to explode simply because of the presence of cheese somewhere in the spaceship you have done something terribly wrong somwhere.
I mean imagine if anyone caught wind of this strategic vulnerability and weaponised cheese.
The consequences do not bear thinking of.
-
2014-07-01, 12:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
-
2014-07-01, 12:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Gender
NOW COMPLETE: Let's Play Starcraft II Trilogy:
Hell, It's About Time: Wings of Liberty
Does This Mutation Make Me Look Fat: Heart of the Swarm
My Life For Aiur? I Barely Know 'Er: Legacy of the Void