Results 1,471 to 1,500 of 1523
-
2009-03-06, 01:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
When the TV show consists of little less than propaganda. Like Captain America. But we don't call the Nazis Nazis, we came up with another name for them.
It adds something. Not much, but it's not nothing.
Will do.
But people do associate what they see on TV with real life, even if they're watching fiction.
A name occasionally used by the public in light conversation. And before the public is part of the UNA.
But if you like structure, why are you trying to get us to be more random?
Because there are some who do like it.
If it's "just a name" and "no big deal" and we like it, why shouldn't we use it?
So am I. We can have a character mention FAIL in a comic to another character, who then acts confused, and the first character explains the idea behind it. Then it'll be canon.
Well, that kind of goes against the "do what you want" spirit of ABR, but sure. One vote for not kicking out the idea of using FAIL.
Captain America beats up Nazi's on a regular basis. Tony Stark is seen taking his fateful injury in the middle east in his latest incarnation. And this is a propaganda riddled show about someone defending the UNA against its enemies, realistically they'd have a parallel to ALF, and if the show is widespread, realistically people would use the parallel in real life discussions.
So you're against it because you don't like it. While we've been working at including other people's ideas in some way, even if it wasn't how they originally saw them being used.
-
2009-03-06, 01:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Darlington, Co. Durham
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
So do we count Threeshades' latest comic as taking place before the Mass Fly?
-
2009-03-06, 02:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Garbsen, Germany
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
everybody's talking about mass fly spells. I must have missed that part in the comic.
-
2009-03-06, 02:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- In the mind.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
The mass fly comic hasn't been made yet I believe.
If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.
Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.
-
2009-03-06, 02:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Garbsen, Germany
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
then why should it nt be before the mass fly?
-
2009-03-06, 02:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
-
2009-03-06, 02:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- In the mind.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Ah. So it's an "off-panel" thing. No wonder I didn't notice it.
If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.
Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.
-
2009-03-06, 02:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
It doesn't matter if they do or don't. Why on earth would they call them FAIL? It doesn't make any sense. You don't give a joke name to a terrorist organisation, it doesn't happen. Terrorism is something serious, giving them a joke name is beyond stupid, it's completely ridicules.
If FI is supposed to be structured and serious why would you even consider using the world "FAIL". It's hypocritical. It's like having a hardcore horror film and all of a sudden care bears come out and sing.
... Well not that extreme but you get what I mean.
It doesn't fit.
So am I. We can have a character mention FAIL in a comic to another character, who then acts confused, and the first character explains the idea behind it. Then it'll be canon.
There are ten people. Everyone is religious. They all call their God X. But one person decides to call the God Y. When he talks to the other people about Lord X but calls him Lord Y, they're not going to know what he's talking about.
So you're against it because you don't like it. While we've been working at including other people's ideas in some way, even if it wasn't how they originally saw them being used.
I've given lists of why I don't think we should use it.
Also, note the smiley at the end of that point.
Anyway, wouldn't it make more sense to use a different name that actually makes sense like "The Terrorists" or "Igon's army" or something along those lines?
Something with out an acronym.
It works much better and is less confusing because it doesn't sound like an official name, but still gives another name for people to use.
I think that's a fair compromise.
Use FAIL- 1
Don't use FAIL- 1Last edited by Nameless; 2009-03-06 at 03:24 PM.
-
2009-03-06, 02:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Garbsen, Germany
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 03:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- In the Playground
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Vampire Rot, it's apparent that we will get little to no respect here, so I say we just either wait for FI, or fight the Shades. Just a suggestion, seeing as we have only been put in two comics besides our own. Or so.
@Nameless: Chalk up another vote for not-fail, if mine counts.Last edited by Falgorn; 2009-03-06 at 03:32 PM.
Dr, Bath's Dolly!
-
2009-03-06, 03:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Airstrip One
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
It's a from kids show. That's the in universe explanation behind the name. The hero regularly defeats the goons of the evil organisation "FAIL" who plan to overthrow the UNA and 'liberate' the population.
Out of universe, we're using the name because we're trying to compromise here.
It's like having an additional level of detail in what is meant to be a complex plotline. ALF is so unreal to most of the population of Avbaroy, it's like something out of a kids show. Hey, it's just like the organisation in that show there!
But, if the religion refers to a particular sect as Sect A, but then someone calls it Sect B, because their just like that sect on TV, then it might catch on.
Well, I didn't exactly ignore the other points. My argument was that those reasons are invalid.
It's a name from a kids show. It's not meant to be a serious name.
-
2009-03-06, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
But it would make more sense to give them another name which doesn't sound like an official name and isn't yet another acronym.
And a terrorist group and joke one is still unrealistic, whether it's from a kids show or not. You would want to warn the kids about the group, make them look evil not make them look funny.
-
2009-03-06, 04:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Reply Hazy. Ask again.
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Meh. stop arguing. Its getting annoying.
As for the Energy drain, as I see it, it doesn't need to be a slam attack or any other natural wepons, thats just for D&D. If a vampire can energy drain by hitting people with a part of its body, it makes sence that on any physical contact (such as a poke) could let said vampire energy drain. And she is not paralysed, just surprised. I mean, if it felt like your very life energy was being sucked out, what would you do?
But with the mass fly spell, Threeshade jumping on me is before that, then they both go back and get the spell, and start flying up, right?
And shouldn't someone make a new thread or something?
-
2009-03-06, 04:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
I vote Not-fail. It seems to me that people would actually call the TV version the original name instead of the other way around. Unless they don't want their kids to know what's going on with the terrorists in the real world, then they might say FAIL when the kids are around (highly unlikely). But aside from that people would recognize that FAIL is just a take-off of ALF, and call FAIL ALF. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Besides, every other media probably calls it ALF, why would ONE TV show make people call an organization a joke name when EVERYTHING ELSE (newspapers, government, etc.) calls it something else. The show might be popular, but it can't make everyone call a terrorist organization a joke name.
*cough*This sounds more like "people arguing and then not listening to the other persons argument, accusing the other person of not listening to their argument, and then throwing their previous argument back at them." than "discussion".*cough* What? I didn't say anything.
-
2009-03-06, 04:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- North
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Treasured Quotes
-
2009-03-06, 04:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
-
2009-03-06, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
I cant remember why the ALF don't like the UNA to be honest.
Use FAIL- 1
Don't use FAIL- 3
-
2009-03-06, 04:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 04:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- North
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Treasured Quotes
-
2009-03-06, 04:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Darlington, Co. Durham
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 05:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- On Paper
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
I vote for FAIL. One that note, can we all agree to abide by this vote. Really, I don't care one way or another (Though considering my arguments, apparently I do), but when we say we arn't using it, Gremlin is insistant that we do (Actually, he suggested a reasonable compromise), Nameless is then insistant that we don't use it. Neither side is willing to back down, so lets let this vote settle the issue once and for all.
For the sake of completness, let's say that when there have been no votes for 24 hours, the voting is closed and the current tally stands, unless it's a tie in which case we extend it another 24 hours. Otherwise the voting is never officially over, and is therefore fairly pointless.
-
2009-03-06, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- London, UK
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
-
2009-03-06, 05:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Ancapistan
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Dark Souls Remake in a Nutshell
Don't mess with a Primarch
Sometimes I make avatars too. Shoot me a PM if interested.
-
2009-03-06, 05:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- In the Playground
-
2009-03-06, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Garbsen, Germany
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- North
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
I vote for FAIL.
@Falgorn: One of my characters will soon agree with you but right now they all are criminals (exept those who don't exist and work for the resistance spy department wich doesn't exist either) so they don't care what your opinion is.
@Rand: Gremlin wanned the UNA to call the resisytance (ALF) for FAIL bt some dislike that, he then compromised saying that it's what public people call them because of that's what a terrorist group that's supossed to be a pparody of them from a TV show is called.Treasured Quotes
-
2009-03-06, 06:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Okay, first of all:
It is not a kids' show!!!
By all accounts, it is a very mature show.
Second:
Put in another vote for 'use FAIL'.
Finally: People use it because it's politically correct, and also catchy. Also, because the show is very popular.
Now, this vote doesn't really matter. Especially if it is a tie. We'll call them FAIL and ALF, and you guys can rant about it all you like, that will change nothing. So it's a bit pointless.Last edited by The Gremlin; 2009-03-06 at 06:11 PM.
-
2009-03-06, 06:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 06:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Gender
-
2009-03-06, 06:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- In the mind.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XVIII
Argument about FAIL vs ALF: "tl, dr".
If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.
Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.