Results 511 to 540 of 629
Thread: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 12:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- California (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Since Atreyu's cool, and I'm not a wolf, I'mma gonna go with Tasroth.
Want an avatar? Shoot me a PM.
Current DYF Avatar by the fantastic Alarra
Awards/Trophies/Quotes
ABR: SDSB ArchiveSpoiler
-
2011-02-21, 01:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Well if I'm right then not killing Atreyu today possibly gives the wolves lynch control (and thus victory) due to the extra voting power of the prof. Not that I bothered doing any maths.
-
2011-02-21, 08:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- The Fortress of Cereneld
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
I agree with Ramsus. Atreyu. And I do suspect Szilard as well (yes, I know it's easy to claim this now, but I was thinking it during the Night phase). Honestly, my brain clearly isn't working right as well, because I can see all the reasons I should have voted for Atreyu yesterday.
And I'm suprised but pleased that we haven't lost yet.What do you mean "Dungeon Master" isn't a proper job?
Thanks to Thufir for the avatar.
D&D Characters Past and Present:
Spoiler
The Honest Man (3.5 LG human fighter), Princess Kailee (4e Good elf cleric), Elric (4e Good human paladin)
Talia Dakashnit (3.5 CE human fighter), Gabriel Stryfe (d20 Modern fast hero), Tacin Willow (3.5 NG human fighter//bard)
GitP Blood Bowl Legacy League - Season 3 recruiting
-
2011-02-21, 11:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- The Steamboat
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Hmm.... Atrey or Tasroth.... >.<
......Atreyu.
-
2011-02-21, 12:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- JC, TN or Camelot.
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
And what happens if you're wrong, because I'm telling you, as sure as tacos are tasty that I'm not from Camp-Wrong-Side-of-the-Tracks this time.
^ RUKI!!
But seriously, go compare how I played this game compared to how I played the other two games that I was in. In those I was wolfy and I really didn't say or do much with the game, just RP'ed a little bit. In this game I heavily implied I was from the Real World, which I would not have done if I was part of Real Life.
Care to make a rebuttal or will you keep following a list that hasn't worked out so well so far? Is your only argument really "Well, the list has been wrong so far, so its got to be right now? I mean...It's a list.!"Last edited by Atreyu the Masked LLama; 2011-02-21 at 12:18 PM.
inner circle Legionary of Resiliance
I love my Ceikatars!
Spoiler
Not here as much. I am out Roman around.
-
2011-02-21, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- In the shadows
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
For this purposes of this discussion, Lex = the Narrator Lex-Kat, and Lex-kat = the character Lex-kat.
Since this game has already turned controversial, I'm going to step in and ask:
Why is no one willing to consider Murska is lying?
It all begins with Supagoof's Day 10 narration, seen here.
The basic claim by Murska is: I sent Murska a PM telling him he is a playgrounder. Then sent him another claiming I made an error, and he was now Lex-kat.
The question I would hope someone would have asked, not me or Supagoof, is: Why would Lex allow the game to continue with Murska and Sanity both thinking they were Lex-kat?
It just doesn't make sense. If I'd mistakenly made Murska a Playgrounder and then made him Lex-kat, why would I have allowed Sanity to be declared Lex-kat when he died?
If Supagoof had made a mistake at the end of the narration, I would have corrected it, immediately. No ifs, ands, or buts. Sanity is Lex-kat. So why do you still believe that Murska is?
The proof is out there. When Alarra was being lynched, I allowed it, not because I was trying to even the score, but because I still thought I had not made a mistake. As previously stated, I had counted the votes for Korias vs. Gray Mage twice, and still come out with a tie that Gray Mage won. Or lost, depending on you P.O.V..
After FC's Night Kill (but before the actual narration), I started creating a table to show FC who voted and how the vote tally went. It was then that I found the missing vote for Korias, and immediately began trying to make it better.
I was going to add Gray Mage back into the game, with two free scries. But upon thinking it through, it would not have worked. It would have instantly given the Playgrounders a trustworthy Seer, and he had the benefit of six players he no longer had to consider targets. The Devil would have still had to look through four of those.
So I nixed that plan. Sorry Gray Mage. That's when I asked for your opinions. What did I get? Everyone who posted about it, including some of the dead, said continue the game. And what was Fleeing Coward saying? He was sure he'd figured out who Lex-kat was. Of course, he had a nearly legitimate reason to still believe Murska. Imperial Psycho had vouched for him after-all.
So the game continued, Fleeing Coward died, and Sanity was lynched the next day, claiming to be Lex-kat. Murska was doomed! After Sanity's lynch, Ramsus swiftly pointed out Murska's non-Lex-katness.
Murska claimed narrator mistake. Ramsus asked me to confirm, hence asking me to out Murska myself. Now, that is not the narrator's place.
I should not have to tell you that there is only one Lex-kat role in this game. That to have two Lex-kats fluttering around would have been uneven against the wolves. I should not have to tell you that if the mistake had happened like Murska claimed, I would have either informed Murska that I had been doubly mistaken, or informed Sanity702 that he was not Lex-kat. But I definitely would not have been counting both of them as Lex-kat.
But I am doing so now. Why? Because I consider this to be a wolf victory.
SpoilerAtreyu the Masked Llama has been unmasked. He is, Atreyu the Masked Llama. A playgrounder.
GAME OVER!
Player list
Spoiler{table=head]#|Player|Killed?|Role
1|Haruki-Kun|Winner!|Journalist (Devil)
2|Murska|Winner!|Professor (Alpha)
3|Qwaz|Winner!|Parent (Beast)
4|Ramsus|Day 14|Zeb the Troll
5|Szilard|Night 13|Playgrounder
6|Tasroth|Day 13|Playgrounder
7|Lord Fullbladder, Master of Goblins|Night 12|Playgrounder
24|Atreyu the Masked Llama|Day 12|Playgrounder
23|cd4|Night 11|Playgrounder
22|Eldritch Knight|Day 11|Playgrounder
21|Otakuryoga|Night 10|Supagoof (Careless Baner)
20|Sanity702|Day 10|Lex-kat (Narrator)
19|Fleeing Coward|Night 9|Playgrounder
18|Alarra|Day 9|Hacker (Disguiser)
17|Orzel|Night 8|Playgrounder
16|Mangosta71|Night 8|Roland St. Jude (Killer)
15|Zanshin|Night 8|Parent (Beast)
14|Lady Tialait|Day 8|Playgrounder
13|Imperial Psycho|Night 7|Indurain (Seer/Fool)
12|Korias|Day 7- AL|Atreyu the Masked Llama (Seer/Fool)
11|Gray Mage|Day 7|Shadow (Seer/Defender)
10|Matt K|Day 6|Doctor (Voider)
9|the Fiery Tower|Night 5|Alarra (Alarra)
8|Blue Ghost|Night 4|Murska (Seer/Defender)
7|Deathslayer7|Night 4|Pudding Troll (Shield)
6|Helgraf|Day 4|Playgrounder
5|Zar Peter|Night 3|Playgrounder
4|Thufir|Day 3|Playgrounder
3|Indurain|Night 2|Playgrounder
2|Reinholdt|Night 1|Playgrounder
1|Duneyrr|Day 1|Playgrounder
[/table]
Let the heated debate over how I should have handled this begin!
-
2011-02-21, 12:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- In the Interwebz
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
That was fun.
"I laugh at life, it's antics make for me a giddy game. Where only foolish fellows take themselves with solemn aim.”
-
2011-02-21, 12:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
I know some people are gonna moan about about the one (There was only ever one) narrator error so I'm just going to jump in and say that had Korias won the lynch vote as he was supposed to none of the *Maths* that should have outed Murska would have built up steam so quickly like it did.
Sure we netted Gray mage, a seer, but it essentially shoved Murska and Alarra into the fire too. The real-worlders would have prefered that it didn't happen either and that we stayed under cover too. Murska was having to be super careful with his point the whole game and this kinda messed that up. What I'm trying to say is We were forced to scramble by the mistake too so I don't feel it directly favoured us.
Everyone left - When the one error was spotted it was immediately confessed. When directly questioned about Murskas claim lex refused to confirm or deny it. I would usually read this as an attempt not to influence the game...the fact that it was Murska...saying it on day 10?...the fact that it was Murska saying anything on day 10? I'd of called him a wolf. I wish to applaud you all for giving him the benefit of the doubt. It must be nice to live through a whole game now and then
I want to thank Lex and the Goof. Good, if controversial, fun!
Tasroth - I do apologise. I see now how you may not have been a wolf
Imperial Psycho/Lex - Have to ask, was Murska scry because you were a fool at the time or did the Alpha scry as villager here. Because the opening narration didn't mention that as an Alpha power I assumed fool.
MattK, Zanshin, Alarra, Haruki-Kun & Murska - Had a blast "Would wolf again! 5-Star!"
EDIT - PS, I have taken a leaf from Duneyrr's book and saved all the wolf PM's. I shall post them up as and when I have the time. Just for a look at how we really scrambled...and were convinced of a secret role for a while
EDIT 2 - Game rules feedback. Having to find 4 potential seers is a little bit of a mountain to climb. I realise two are neutral and *could* be recruited but the chances of that are slim to none if their "wards" are village which if distributed randomly is more likely.Last edited by Qwaz; 2011-02-21 at 12:59 PM.
-
2011-02-21, 12:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- In the shadows
- Gender
-
2011-02-21, 12:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Great Britain
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
I knew Murska was lying the moment he said he was Lex-kat.
Sadly I became aware of it posthumously.
-
2011-02-21, 12:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 01:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Well, I did suggest that you shouldn't put me back in the game and could instead say that I got an honorary win due to narrator mystake or something like that.
-
2011-02-21, 01:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Last edited by Qwaz; 2011-02-21 at 01:07 PM.
-
2011-02-21, 01:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Whose eye is that eye?
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
I... can't believe I lived.
I mean, I knew I was doomed when Sanity died, and figured I'd done a good job of myself while I was alive. I was hoping on Haruki to win alone as there were no Seers left and he was under the radar.
But out of the principle of the thing, I made up a desperation attempt half-jokingly to try to convince someone to not vote my way... and then decided to keep up with it after it actually worked.
I mean, the narrators have the duty to confirm if they made an error. They also have a duty to not confirm if someone lies about an error. So the fact that they didn't confirm should've been a dead giveaway.
-
2011-02-21, 01:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 01:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 01:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Whose eye is that eye?
- Gender
-
2011-02-21, 01:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 01:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Were you originally gonna defend Murska? That would have been great to get another scryer on board!
EDIT - Reply to below...Owww :(Last edited by Qwaz; 2011-02-21 at 01:21 PM.
-
2011-02-21, 01:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
-
2011-02-21, 01:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Great Britain
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
My scrying record is something to behold.
1: Murska - Playgrounder (LIEEES)
2: Alarra - Interference
3: Atreyu - Interference
4. Forgot to send one in, I think.
5. Voided.
6. Voided.
7. Dead.Last edited by Imperial Psycho; 2011-02-21 at 01:23 PM.
-
2011-02-21, 01:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Yes, but I was really happy when he said he was the baner. That meant that if I were to lead the lynch against the wolves, and that if he'd protect me every night, I wouldn't be neither lynched nor night killed by mistake. But then LT didn't see my PM telling Zanshin was the beast before she posted and she didn't want to edit and there were that mistake with the counting of votes and you know what happened.
-
2011-02-21, 01:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Trogland
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
That was fun to watch!! I was really upset when I died so early, and didn't expect to care about the game much longer. However, I just couldn't stop watching, wondering how long Alarra could stay alive in her own game. I figured she'd get Shadow ruled after day 3 of a game named after her!
And then there's Murska's blown Bluff check...and every villager failing their Sense Motive on it.
Well done Real Lifers, even with the mistake, you earned that victory!!
-
2011-02-21, 02:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- JC, TN or Camelot.
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Aye! I agree with Indy, well except that I'm not dead. However, it was quite a fun game. I'd be up for another. I do wish I'd had more time to devote to this one, but alas, being villians in 2 other games did limit my time.
Also, SERIOUSLY, note how I goofed off in this one and not the other two. I'm really a rather predictable player and my wolfiness can be assertained in 2 to 3 days.inner circle Legionary of Resiliance
I love my Ceikatars!
Spoiler
Not here as much. I am out Roman around.
-
2011-02-21, 02:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Tacoma, WA
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Dang. Would it matter if I say "I told you so?" I guess not. Good game I had fun reading it!
-
2011-02-21, 03:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- California (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
I guess I kinda survived til the end?
Fun game, even though I didn't do much.Want an avatar? Shoot me a PM.
Current DYF Avatar by the fantastic Alarra
Awards/Trophies/Quotes
ABR: SDSB ArchiveSpoiler
-
2011-02-21, 04:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
Before Game even Starts
Spoiler================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Lex-kat
Date : 2011-01-11 06:26
Title : Re: Alarra ITP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh no worries. With the number of games recruiting right now (a post christmas/new year boom?) I might suggest putting
mine on hold for a quieter time. I'll see what the sign ups are like toward the end of the month.
No worries. I'll just stick to my "don't sign up to any more games for the minute" plan.
Originally Posted by Lex-kat
Introductions
Spoiler================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-11 06:38
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh. I'll be as active as you need. I'm a Brit who works in a nightclub so it might be at some ungodly hours but I
shouldn't miss any days.
Chuffed to be picked. Let's steal Alarra for our own!
I take it you'll be sending in the kill Murska?
Originally Posted by Lex-katOriginally Posted by Matt K
From : Qwaz
To : Murska
Date : 2011-01-12 01:33
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thumbs up. Understood.
Originally Posted by Murska
Day/Night 1
Spoiler================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-12 22:43
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sanity702 & Duneyrr have given us a gift. Let's say Duneyrr does die today. Tonight we kill & scry and tomorrow post
something like...
"Duneyrr did have a point. Were you just saying that so your first day kill would seem more random? Are you actually a
wolf Sanity702?"
No way that one doesn't take off
================================================== ==============================
From : Murska
To : Lex-kat, Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-13 16:42
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sending kill at Reinholdt for now. Any kill messages from the wolves that come after this one will take preference.
================================================== ==============================
From : Haruki-kun
To : Alarra, Matt K, Murska, Qwaz, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-13 17:23
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Murska
Note: Honestly, Murska, I'll be very surprised if you survive too long in this one. They're gonna be on your tail. And
this time you're actually guilty. <.<
================================================== ==============================
From : Matt K
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Murska, Qwaz, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-13 18:11
Title : Re: ItP: The Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds good, I'll be voiding Lady Tialat.
Day/Night 2
Spoiler================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-14 17:17
Title : Re: Scry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose with 5 scryers that's gonna be fairly common. With the Seer/Fool randomly changing throughout the game they'll
have a real problem getting a network together properly.
I see these as the real threats
SpoilerShadow (Seer/Defender)- Everything learned has a price. And almost no one knows that more then Shadow, except
maybe Murska. Each night Shadow can send in a name to learn the role of that player. Though his scries are 100% accurate,
his goals are not.
Murska (Seer/Defender)- Everything learned has a price. And almost no one knows that more then Murska, except maybe
Shadow. Each night Murska can send in a name to learn the role of that player. Though his scries are 100% accurate, his
goals are not.
I''m guessing maybe one is a wolf role and one is a villager? Or maybe they are Rivals. Trying to find and take out each
other?
Either way. Without extra info those two are the biggest threat to us as they can trust their scrys and form a
network...etc
Let's look on the positive. We didn't lose info...we stopped someone else gaining info!
Originally Posted by Haruki-kun
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-14 17:41
Title : Re: itp Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phew, you lucky ******!
Also "how rude"! I thought it was manners not to scry you for at least a few days to give you a chance to play
Question is. Do we kill him Asap to knock at least one seer/fool out or would that just make the other the Seer
constantly?
Originally Posted by Murska
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-14 17:48
Title : Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murska just posted this in Central.
I'll send in the kill until I hear you're back.
================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-14 19:10
Title : Re: itp Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and everyone. I know it's probably obvious but just incase.
Noone try to start anything against Ramsus today. It'll look like we're in touch with Murska and villagers would have no
reason to be so on Day 2. It'll make IP suspicious.
================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Thufir
Date : 2011-01-16 15:08
Title : itp Battle for Alarra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey -REAL LIFE NAME REDACTED-,
Thought I should give you a heads up you're 1 day off from Autolynch!
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showt...=181892&page=4
================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-16 15:45
Title : itp Battle for Alarra night 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, what do we do?
I suggest we kill Indurain tonight. He voted for lady T day 2. If we kill him now it adds weight to the Lady T is a wolf
theory already presented in thread and more firmly points the finger at those late on the Duneyrr bandwagon day one.
The fact there was no majority reached for the day lynch is great. Any money they'll argue about random voting and giving
proper reasons now. Hopefully they'll be more willing to fall onto trapped bandwagons...Trapwagons?
Since IP didn't get interferance on Murska we know the other 3 scriers (Murska, Shadow & other seer/fool) didn't try a
peek at Murska night 1. Might be worth disguising him as a villager but I reckon with the amount of heat Alarra's getting
in thread she'll be scried multiple times over the next few days so she should keep disguising herself. ontop of that, we
lose Murska we lose an extra point or two (which he has to use very carefully anyway or risk revealing himself), we lose
alarra, we lose the possibility of an inside track on the network which will doubtless form.
As far as Scrying goes I have no particular ideas. Gray Mage seems to be offering analysis and keeping an eye on things.
Anyone?
Voiding. I suppose it's an effective way to neutralise IP, while using the Kill & the scry to search for others. It's the
most efficient use since he's the only assured powerrole we know but it will throw suspicion onto Murska if we do it for
too long. Plus side it'll keep the other Seer/Fool distrusting their scries for longer.
tl;dr: I suggest
Void Imperial Psycho
Kill Indurain
Scry Gray Mage
Disguise Alarra (as whatever you have been...keeping it consistant)
What's everyone else thinking?
With Murska away for the weekend I intend to send the kill in in around 9 hours unless I hear some arguement.
If I should be sending in any of the other actions just let me know. Might be easier for lex if she got one consolidated
PM of our actions. I don't really know wolf etiquette
================================================== ==============================
From : Qwaz
To : Haruki-kun
Date : 2011-01-16 18:40
Title : Re: itp Battle for Alarra night 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm given to believe IP and if we can influence him night on night to scry various people we can use him to find the other
Seer/fool (fool's only accurte reading usually).
Maybe best to be sure.
Originally Posted by Haruki-kun
From : Qwaz
To : Matt K
Date : 2011-01-17 00:00
Title : Re: itp Battle for Alarra night 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah sounds about right mate.
Watch out incase Murska calls an audible though
Originally Posted by Matt K
From : Qwaz
To : Alarra, Haruki-kun, Matt K, Murska, Zanshin
Date : 2011-01-17 22:48
Title : Re: itp BfA Scry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the other option. I've no problem with killing him, but while he does live, let's use him. I agree he is a
potential liability though while he lives the OTHER seer/fool cannot be sure what they are. That's not to mention Murska
and Shadow pondering about out there.
Maybe he should live up until the point we're about to kill one of his scries?
Originally Posted by Haruki-kun
From : Murska
To : Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-16 15:51
Title : Re: itp Battle for Alarra night 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm back now. As Alarra already knows, IP told me he'll scry her. I'm assuming Alarra disguised herself as a villager -
should we have her disguise herself as some sort of a powerrole to be sure of IP as well as possibly get more into his
trust?
As for the kill, no objection there. I'll be sending it along now, feel free to switch it if we come to another
conclusion.
Scry... perhaps we should make sure of IP? Or maybe scry someone else, whom we don't know of, to increase our general
knowledge more.
================================================== ==============================
From : Murska
To : Lex-kat, Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-16 15:52
Title : Battle for Alarra N2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Targetting Indurain for death, kthx. As usual, superceded by other options sent later.
================================================== ==============================
From : Haruki-kun
To : Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-17 15:15
Title : FW: I scry with my little eyes...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Lex-kat
Less likely scenarios include him already being in contact with another scryer.
================================================== ==============================
From : Zanshin
To : Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-17 19:17
Title : Re: itp BfA Scry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Murska
is about Alarra. No one seems to be pointing at her today yet, so that is a good sign. The Thufir bandwagon seems to be
steaming along nicely as well.
The subterfuge center of my brain has been on hold- ironically due to RL issues-so if there is a pattern we canI just now saw a possibility: Helgraf's post on Day 2.
exploit I don't see it yet.
We kill him, or Lady T, and it could implicate Szilard or cd4.
================================================== ==============================
From : Zanshin
To : Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-17 23:23
Title : Re: itp BfA Scry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule bothers me about any alliance with IP:
(The role of who is the Fool, and who is the Seer is randomly changed throughout the game.)
As the fool (which until proven otherwise we can assume he is), we should have him scry a villager as many nights as we
can. If he hits a "Wolf", we get a free day kill. And the good part is when that person shows up as a Villager, oops, I
guess you've changed from Seer to Fool.
Of course that'll be the last day we can use him and he must die.
================================================== ==============================
From : Murska
To : Qwaz
Date : 2011-01-20 14:38
Title : FW: itp BfA Scry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by MurskaLast edited by Qwaz; 2011-02-21 at 04:32 PM.
-
2011-02-21, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Milliways
- Gender
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
To Lady T- if I had any idea my outlandish post would have ended up the way it did... I probably still would have done it. Sorry.
But I did not expect to take the Killer out with me. My plan was to claim I was the victim of a malevolent Disguiser.
Shots rang out, as shots are wont to do.
Top Narrations/Deaths featuring myself (in no particular order):
1. Saved by the Konami code!
2. Wait, I was an android?
-
2011-02-21, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
-
2011-02-21, 05:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Great Britain
Re: ITP- Battle for Alarra
People kinda overestimated how much I trusted Murska, tbh. I defended him a bit, but only saying 'I've known him for some time and wolves haven't got me.'
I was actually somewhat suspicious of him for some time. I didn't tell him who I scried after night 2.