Results 481 to 510 of 1476
-
2011-02-10, 08:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ēast Seaxna rīc
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
"that nighted, penguin-fringed abyss" - At The Mountains of Madness, H.P. Lovecraft
When a man decides another's future behind his back, it is a conspiracy. When a god does it, it's destiny.
-
2011-02-10, 09:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Philippines
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-10, 11:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Gender
-
2011-02-10, 11:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Mass.
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-11, 01:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
-
2011-02-11, 01:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Somewhere lost in dream.
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-11, 07:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Av by Smuchmuch
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Everything?
There is a grand total of zero non-psychic units, save for some models in some entries, by overall, everyone in entry has at least one psychic model. Ahem.
The only problem is, his 'witchy' army consisting of 2+ save models is going to be rather hard to count-as.
By the way, I posted spoilers, and as usual, nothing happened. There were more posts requesting spoilers than discussing them. Oh, well.
Maybe this extra proof spoilers are real will start something :P
Spoiler
-
2011-02-11, 09:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-11, 09:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Southwestern Germany
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
I have that battle report I promised practically finished, except for the diagrams showing what actually happened during the battle. Not sure I'll manage to make them today though, as I want to finish painting a model or a few (at least my second Fire Prism) before the tournament tomorrow. Painting will not be rated, but I'd rather have my army look nice regardless. It's their first tournament, after all (they grow up so fast *sniff* ).
Speaking of which, I got only one reply to:
The Saturday in question being tomorrow now. So, any last advice, maybe?LGBTitP Supporter
In a Wonderland they lie, Dreaming as the days go by, Dreaming as the summers die - Ever drifting down the stream - Lingering in the golden gleam - Life, what is it, but a dream?
- Lewis Carroll
-
2011-02-11, 09:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
The only thing I can really suggest is find points for a Warlock with Conceal on your Jetbikes. But, I'm not really sure where you're going to find those points. So, yeah...It doesn't look that good. But, the only way to fix it is to just redo the whole list. Which you don't want to do, right?
-
2011-02-11, 09:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Rumours, at this stage, I can't see being definite. I mean we didn't know bollocks on the Dark Eldar until like a week before they got released.
Models, are harder to change once they have pictures. That giant walker dude looks dumb though.
"Holy arse, re-rolls".
I get the distinct feeling any opponents you have will hate you.I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2011-02-11, 09:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
All we really knew about Dark Eldar was that they had poison. So exciting...It really wasn't. And, even then, the Codex was only on preview for two weeks before release - and only if you had pre-ordered it - as opposed to the three weeks-to-a-month previews that we're used to.
The giant walker...Thing...Looks completely stupid.
-
2011-02-11, 09:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
-
2011-02-11, 09:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2011-02-11, 10:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Colour me unimpressed.
All it means is that for the next few months everyone needs to remember to take Plasmaguns until the next non-SpaceMarine army comes out.So... Tired...
-
2011-02-11, 10:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Southwestern Germany
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Yeah, Conceal would be great... not sure what to remove either, though. I wouldn't mind redoing the whole list if it meant making it more effective, though - however, I don't know what exactly my partner has available, nor whether he will be willing to change his list, so whatever change you suggest, bear in mind I should probably bring at least two Troops choices, as my partner is likely to bring no more than one, and that it should compliment his list (Kairos Fateweaver, Soulgrinder, some number of Bloodcrushers, some number of Plaguebearers) well.
Also, since the tournament will be tomorrow, I will have to make do with the models I already have. Namely:
- Farseer on Jetbike
- Warlock on Jetbike
- 12 Jetbikes (4 with Shuriken Cannons)
- 15 Rangers/Pathfinders
- 10 Fire Dragons (with Exarch, bearing Dragonbreath)
- 2 Fire Prisms
- Wave Serpent with EML
I could put together a second Jetbike-Warlock, if necessary, and if I really rushed I guess I could put 10 Striking Scorpions together as well, but that's about all I could do (and I'd prefer to spend the time finishing the painting of my second Fire Prism).
Judging by past tournaments I witnessed, I expect almost only Space Marines (of different variations), maybe with a few Imperial Guard armies in between. In the two games I've had so far, the Fire Prisms always proved highly effective; the Jetbikes and Pathfinders varied (in one game against Black Templar, the Jetbikes were so-so, but the Pathfinders were awesome, in the other, against Imperial Guard, the Pathfinders were so-so - though at least they did a good job against carapace armour - and the Jetbikes were awesome).
"Hate the game, don't hate the player".
Eh, if you mean they'd hate me because it's effective, all the better. If you mean they hate me because it's annoying, I think I can offset that with general niceness and quick rolling.LGBTitP Supporter
In a Wonderland they lie, Dreaming as the days go by, Dreaming as the summers die - Ever drifting down the stream - Lingering in the golden gleam - Life, what is it, but a dream?
- Lewis Carroll
-
2011-02-11, 10:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- ^ Creds to Lord Raziere
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-11, 10:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Isnt the knight dreadnought thing just a smaller version of the 9m tall knight titan? Or depending on the scale of the model it might actually be a knight walker. They almost exclusively are used on mars now for defence since the titans replaced their role on the battlefield. They were really cool back in the day and I could see the grey knights having a few lying around seeing as they are obsessed with religion and keeping tradition. It does look a bit odd but I suspect that is because it is just standing straight. If it was in a walking position it would look far more natural.
Lillien Lemmerin:http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetvie...sheetid=111721
Member of the Mr Scruffy fan club
-
2011-02-11, 11:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Av by Smuchmuch
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
*cough*Penitent Engine Mk II*cough*
Except pilot isn't stupid and actually wears 2+ armour and has some guns.
Also, Apothecary, Teleport Packs, Paladins, Champion and a few other things on picture don't warrant mention?
Religion?
I think you mean Sisters here. Or Space Marines. I don't remember GK having any religious beliefs, they don't even have Chaplains, IIRC.
-
2011-02-11, 11:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
I'm going to disagree with Cheesegear on the warlock. Conceal is a reasonable choice on a guardian squad, but nothing else. A 7 strong unit doesn't have enough bodies to have a 5+ do a whole lot for it, its not like a 20+ strong unit of boyz or nids where attrition is a given. Besides, early turns when you are getting into position you have a free 3+ cover save, and once you get into position your normal movement (ie assault move) should make it so it is very rare that you can't get normal cover (which is a better save too). Besides, you have to take more then 6 AP3(or better) wounds on the unit before conceal is better then having the two extra bodies that the warlock costs compared to normal jetbikes (well its only 1 extra body when you count the warlock, 2 if you compare it to what you have now). Most armies (especially at 750 points) aren't going to have that many, especially since most of the things that fit the role will be looking at the prisms. In most cases I expect you will loss the jetbikes to attrition in which case you will never even use the conceal save.
Normally I would also suggest more troops on the chance of an objective based game, but with a team (especially deamons) I wouldn't expect that to be a problem.
-
2011-02-11, 11:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Southwestern Germany
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Mmm, true enough; something similar was my reasoning for not putting a Warlock into this list in the first place (though I admit last game I had I really wished I had had a Warlock with Conceal. Though to be fair, that was against Imperial Guard who really loved Stormtroopers...).
There will be three games (each against different opponents); one will be Annihilation with some minor special rules I've forgotten, one will be dividing the table in four quartiers and having one objective per quarter, with one side being defender (and having to roll for each unit in which quarter it starts), with the attacker side coming from the table's edges, and one that will be basically the normal 1d3+2 mission objective game, Pitched Battle, except for having the Night Fighting rule during the first turn.
And yeah, I'm having a bit of a bad feeling about going in with so few troops myself, but with one unit being infiltrators, one being jetbikes, my partner being Daemons, and my tanks being fast skimmers, I think we should manage.LGBTitP Supporter
In a Wonderland they lie, Dreaming as the days go by, Dreaming as the summers die - Ever drifting down the stream - Lingering in the golden gleam - Life, what is it, but a dream?
- Lewis Carroll
-
2011-02-11, 11:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
To be absolutely fair, it isn't my list that's designed to be up close and personal so much; I just have a pair of units in Chimeras that do. Everyone else sits back with lascannons, missile launchers, and yes, grenade launchers, at least when I have the points to fit all that in. And I only have it set up that way because I'm allying with Space Wolves of late, and they're going to bloody well charge forward no matter what I do; putting some bullet bait in the form of APCs and a Demolisher up front helps immensely. And even without that, you can't just bunker up around your objective all the time and hope to ever win a game; that's a recipe for a draw at the very best. If you're not prepared to move forward to capture, then you simply won't.
Last edited by Renegade Paladin; 2011-02-11 at 11:57 AM.
"Courage is the complement of fear. A fearless man cannot be courageous. He is also a fool." -- Robert Heinlein
-
2011-02-11, 01:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Sweden
- Gender
-
2011-02-11, 05:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
-
2011-02-11, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- San Francisco
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
How are you supposed to use Lysander?
-
2011-02-11, 06:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Honestly, with great difficulty.
Okay, two things he does;
Gives a ruin or fortification in your Deployment Zone +1 Cover Save. So, put an objective there.
Makes your army Stubborn. The only time your Leadership ever gets modified in any significant way is when you lose Assault by truckloads.
Lysander lends himself to shooty-heavy armies that don't move forwards a lot. Whatever you've got sits in that three-storey 3+ cover save ruin and shoots the crap out of things, then every unit you have should be a tarpit. Yeah. Play defensively.
Lysander is not aggressive. That's one of the reasons everyone hates him.
-
2011-02-11, 08:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Philippines
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Also, he works incredibly well when attached to Sternguard. Not only does he allow them to re-roll any failed to hit rolls with their Bolters, he also makes everything think twice before assaulting that squad.
I don't think the Dreadknight looks bad at all. I mean yeah, there is only so much that I can discern from that blurry photo, but it reminds me of the APU's from The Matrix. I can just imagine myself yelling "KNUCKLE UP!!" before I unleash it's supposed "hojillion" Psycannon shots at the enemy.
-
2011-02-12, 01:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Summoners Rift
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
Soooo... My brother plays orks. I kind of know the codex, well enough to know certain parts.. He's still a beginnerish. Basically some one of his starting games he had orks explained to him. When he did, they told him when he waaaaghed with nobz and charged they gained a bonus to toughness (T5) and that it was unrelated to furious charge. Being the..kind of guy I am I contest rules I've never heard of or don't understand and ask the person (ally or opponent) to look it up and show me. I have a habit of doing this unfortunately.. but the rules are the rules and they're there for a reason. Anyways since he could not prove or disprove that it existed or point out where.. I had to assume it was incorrect.
Does anyone know if the nobz get T5 under any circumstance? Especially note if its related to the waaagh. Please and thank you for your help, I've poured over my notes and whatnot for an hour.
Also... note. Scouts with combat blades and pistols.. not as bad as I thought. Most enjoyable to outflank and assault a 30boyz mob and win
-Wrath"If you can, then do. If you cannot, then find a way so you can."
LGBTiTP Supporter
Swain Avatar by Zefir
-
2011-02-12, 01:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- ^ Creds to Lord Raziere
-
2011-02-12, 01:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Summoners Rift
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop X: "Everybody Expects The Inquisition!"
"If you can, then do. If you cannot, then find a way so you can."
LGBTiTP Supporter
Swain Avatar by Zefir