Results 211 to 240 of 277
-
2012-09-04, 11:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
while your statements are all true, your BA is limited by the amount of numerical base attack points you have, regardless of strength or weapon bonus. between the fact that kensai only gives you 7 points of BA, along with the fact that you're supposed to have combat expertise somehow (passive way monk 1 seems the most straightforward, but it loses another precious point of BA) and that you have to multiclass to fighter or something for ride means you're kinda expected to lose at least 4 points of BA. you're barely getting your 4th iterative at all at that point, and that seems like it's against the intent for a melee centric class like kensai.
the str boosting thing doesn't stack with itself since stuff from the same source doesn't stack. it is nice that it's untyped, but since it takes a move action to activate and lasts for class lvl/2, I'd hardly call it game-breaking.
and I wouldn't say the weapon's "free," the way you pay for it is with 10 levels of kensai in your build, same as dread necro's "free" lich apotheosis. well, yeah, it's free if all 20 levels of your build are a 0 cost to you.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-04, 11:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
For starters, I know that a chain devil IS a kyton. Otherwise, you'd have pointed out that there's no difference between a bone devil and an osyluth, which are exactly the same thing. One is a different name for the other.
The "menacing" part is as follows. You have a 8 HD creature at 15th level. That 8 HD creature is considered a CR 6 creature. Disregarding the thing with CR, in theory, that means a 6th level party of four can fight a kyton/chain devil and win, so as long as they consume at least 25% of its resources (to fulfill the 4 encounters/day thing). You are a 15th level character, am I correct? By the time you get Summon Fiend, you are.
Now, as I mentioned with other builds, I like the choice of the chain devil over the babau. Notice how I somewhat glee'd over Reykja's choice of kyton, what with its regeneration, teleportation and other tricks. In fact, this is what I said regarding the Chain Devil/Kyton:
Unlike the Babau, the Chain Devil is surprisingly resilient (Regeneration!),Originally Posted by MeOriginally Posted by Me
Let's go with you, and with...say, the Sacred Demon. Note how I praised that his Babau was stronger than others, because as a Malconvoker and as a summon/calling specialist, that's his bread and bones. Had he chosen a Chain Devil, that Augment Summoning would have granted him a +4 to Strength and Constitution (with the concurrent +2 to attack rolls, damage rolls, and 2 HP/HD), even if only an enhancement bonus.
As for why I went for a "relative"...well, when I hear of "razor", here's what I believe it's a razor:
Spoiler
The description for the Chain Devil's chains goes as follows: A chain devil’s most awesome attack is its ability to control up to four chains within 20 feet as a standard action, making the chains dance or move as it wishes. In addition, a chain devil can increase these chains’ length by up to 15 feet and cause them to sprout razor-edged barbs. IMO, a "razor-sharp barb" isn't necessarily a razor. What was exactly the Rag and Bones' offering to the Chain Devil?
Originally Posted by The Rag and Bone Man
Originally Posted by The Rag and Bone Man
That said, is my sister a relative? Is my cousin a relative? Last I know, both my sister and my cousin are humans. Perhaps it's the way it's worded that elicits confusion, but when I saw how the chain grabbed a few razors, I figured that it had to be a unique fiend, and not your vanilla chain devil. If it is...well, my apologies, but take for granted that I don't think a kyton and a chain devil are any different. Perhaps I was too absorbed on the Cenobite feel that a Freudian slip escaped from my mind?
That said: is the kyton menacing against a 12-HD creature? Is a kyton more menacing than an erinyes (CR 8, 9 HD, flight, more SR, ability to summon other fiends [something that can't be done if summoned, but can be done if called upon], the entangling rope, true seeing), or a bone devil (with the fear aura, poison, more SR, more HD, more CR...notice why I pointed you for osyluth instead of kyton?), or even a barbed devil? In comparison to those, aside from the regeneration effect (which I admit, it's VERY good), the kyton/chain devil is nothing more than a mook. If you had something to boost the Kyton/Chain Devil, it would have been a bit more menacing. However, you're not a buffer; you're a debuffer, and what little buffs you get you have to share with your better undead creatures (the shadows, the 10-headed fiendish hydra skeletons). The kyton doesn't feel like useful as a combatant if you think about it.
2. For Ash'okk Larr, T.G. Oskar notes that Skarn are "by definition, Lawful" when this definition does not match the wording in Magic of Incarnum, where they are noted as "usually lawful. . . Chaotic Skarns are nevertheless tolerated and even welcomed in Skarn society"(p.16). The Originality deduction here appears based on a faulty premise and on a qualm with Elegance; the Chairman asks that the score be re-evaluated on that basis.
What makes a Skarn so extremely important to as to merit being THE choice for the build, in comparison to a different but likely original choice? Is it the boost to Strength at the expense of Dexterity? Is it the spines that can be boosted if you have the ability to bind a chakra to your arms? Is it the bonus to Intimidate and Climb? Perhaps the reptilian subtype?
Well, I see that he chose a class that went for good Strength, and no penalties to Wisdom OR Charisma, so perhaps that disregards Half-Orc. However, fluff-wise, would half-orc fit? Let's see.
Ash'okk's brief mention of Skarn is as follows:
A somewhat “loose cannon” mercenary, Ash’okk was born a Skarn amongst a village of humans. Growing up he quickly took to the sword, slaughtering three bandits when his village was attacked at the age of 18.
A somewhat “loose cannon” mercenary, Ash’okk was born a Half-Orc amongst a village of humans. Growing up he quickly took to the sword, slaughtering three bandits when his village was attacked at the age of 18.
Let's find a better race that has no LA, no penalties to Wisdom or Charisma, and doesn't work with humans...how about Darfellan?
A somewhat “loose cannon” mercenary, Ash’okk was born a Darfellan amongst a village of humans. Growing up he quickly took to the sword, slaughtering three bandits when his village was attacked at the age of 18.
A somewhat “loose cannon” mercenary, Ash’okk was born a Darfellan amongst a village of humans. Growing up he quickly took to the sword, slaughtering Sahuagin bandits when his village was attacked at the age of 18.
If Ash'okk went with Skarn, it had to be because of something. If he wanted to follow the Skarn lore, he should have inclined towards law and perhaps sought to find perfection (the aspiration of a typical Skarn) as destined to a descendant of the Mishtai. If he wanted to go against the flow, he could have mentioned it. As it stands, the only claim to his originality is "I'm a Skarn, and I chose to be chaotic". Anyone could have claimed that.
The reason I was so down-trodden, Mr. Chairman, by Ash'okk's entry in terms of Originality was because his claim towards originality was, IMO, too bland. I think I showed that already. It's so bland, no attempt to spice it up could remove that blandness. I don't intend for a master story, able to explain everything: however, there was nothing that really made me believe it was necessary that a Skarn was part of the build, or why, thematically, there was a need for a Fighter there (being a "loose cannon", explaining how he became a Barbarian would have made it unique). I was looking at two expertly done build in terms of originality, so maybe going from a very original build to a very bland build did it in.
Now, does the choice of Fighter, Paladin of Slaughter and Thrall of Juiblex make it stand up a bit higher in Originality? Perhaps, but IMO, any point I add feels like I'm somehow prizing the Skarn choice and a bland explanation of each choice. There IS a thematic link that's not usual by making a paladin of a demon prince and then becoming its thrall, but where does Fighter and Acolyte of the Skin fit in? Why does Ash'okk became an Acolyte? Oh yes, there is one sentence explaining that:
He was learning how to bind the skin of a demon over his own to allow him to service his Lord better.
It may sound a bit demeaning, but bear with me on this. It's probably the frustration speaking than anything else. I would have loved to see a martial-inclined build enter the class and rack up nice points in Originality, Power, Elegance and Use of Secret Ingredient. Really. One martial-inclined class that felt like it NEEDED to enter the Acolyte class would have probably reached an instant 5. I was already a bit frustrated with the Butcher (and he got a 3.5 on Originality, which is above average), and quite surprised with Wyrmbeard (I mean, he chose an invocation using class, but he went with a curve that was un-hittable; a sure strike if I may say so), then I see yours and...well...the story doesn't help you in any case.
Now, if that is enough explanation to justify why Ash'okk got a 1 on its score when it probably should have been higher, I rest my case. If it doesn't, then perhaps the Chairman may elaborate on Ash'okk's defense: perhaps he may offer a valid point, after my dissertation, that leads me to add perhaps one whole point. However, I refuse to give anything higher than a 2.25 because I feel I would be supporting bland, unoriginal entries where the shock factor matters more than making sense.
If it makes Ash happy: he got a higher score than Morrigna, whom I claimed was the one that needed the Secret Ingredient the least. You can quote me on that, even if I mentioned that the backstory didn't really justify Ash'okk entering AotS either. Ash'okk was at least a bit more devoted to Juiblex than Morrigna was devoted to Malcanthet, and she had this "wear the skins of things" story that could have easily made her meet that goal.
3. I'd like to ask judges to refrain from comments like "If I could, I'd make a better Acolyte of the Skin for you" (quoting a comment under Eshpaunsuud Zhirvaush's judgment); regardless of intent, it reads as "I could have done a better job than you did," which is contrary to the spirit the competition is trying to engender.
It's a misunderstanding.
Let's go bit by bit. The claim for "making a better Acolyte of the Skin for you" wasn't meant as a threat or a challenge of "I could do a better job than yours"; if that was a challenge, I would have entered the competition instead of judging.
And yes, I am well aware I mentioned something like this:
That's a bona-fide attempt for an entry if I ever have seen one. Yet, I did mention something like this:
But again, I thought of this right now, and it wasn't my plate.
But, what I meant with Esh was another thing entirely. Much like what happened with Morrigna: the PrC fit thematically (one was aiming to improve itself with each ritual, the other was more of a skinwalker). Of both, Esh had that problem a bit more with Morrigna (the theme fit, but the class definitely wasn't meant for her as the abilities it offered didn't fit the overarching theme, which was "midwive of aberrations").
What I really meant was "if I could 'brew a better PrC for you to use, I'd let you to". One that really made justice to the build. The reason is because the ability bonuses didn't really grant a noticeable improvement to Esh, and the abilities granted required quite a bit of effort to improve, one that Esh couldn't do because he was already limited. That's why I felt Acolyte of the Skin made no justice to Esh, because it required far more than he could deliver in order to fully take all advantages of the class. I praised his attempts (Mortalbane as an improvement to Poison, the fact that Dexterity is his main attack method) to improve the class' abilities, but he was already growing thin with his feats and spells to really do anything else. And the abilities he got really don't fit him: he was going for charms, illusions and others, and all of a sudden he gets three extremely limited abilities such as a gaze of fear, a gaze of spontaneous combustion and a poisonous touch. Every time I looked between what he had and the class, it felt that the PrC did no justice mechanically to what he wanted to get. I know that's the gist of the competition (you don't get what you want), but he made such a nice effort that I felt inclined to say "I have to make a better PrC to make you justice".
Speaking of which, I WILL. In fact, I was already working on it. If I may, I'd like to see how Esh works replacing all the levels in the Acolyte from Complete Arcane and how he'd go with the homebrewed version. I extend the same invitation to Morrigna. The chefs may attempt to do that on their own, if they wish. Is that the right olive leaf to offer, or is it still the wrong answer?Retooler of D&D 3.5 (and 5e/Next) content. See here for more.
Now with a comprehensive guide for 3.5 Paladin players porting to Pathfinder. Also available for 5th Edition
On Lawful Good:
T.G. Oskar profile by Specter.
-
2012-09-05, 01:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Last edited by Kelb_Panthera; 2012-09-05 at 01:35 AM.
I am not seaweed. That's a B.
Praise I've received A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign
Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle
-
2012-09-05, 04:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
But... essentially what you're saying is that you're judging it based on backstory, rather than actually on the build - aka if the backstory was more eloquent then it would have recieved a higher score.
That seems entirely fair and balanced. After all, this contest was made to determine who can write the best story!
-
2012-09-05, 06:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Originally Posted by Venger
That was, indeed, what I (thought I) indicated.
Originally Posted by T.G. Oskar
-
2012-09-05, 12:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
IMHO, discussions about a judge's work don't really help. TG did a fine, detailed judging. It took a lot of his time and nowadays judges don't even get badges anymore. Does he need to be bothered further yet because people didn't like his judging?
-
2012-09-05, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Spring, TX
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I have to ask...did anyone else look at this PrC and think "You know, Truenamer fits right in here?"
-
2012-09-05, 01:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
-
2012-09-05, 02:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-05, 02:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
-
2012-09-05, 02:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Now that you've said it's Kensai, it won't be.
Last edited by Kazyan; 2012-09-05 at 02:22 PM.
-
2012-09-05, 02:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
-
2012-09-05, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
oh, I'm far from sure. I thought it was clear from the context that I was joking, but I guess not. a 10 level prestige class with no casting and intimidate as a class skill doesn't exactly narrow it down much in my mind either. it could be anything from exemplar to twisted lord, I don't really have a way of narrowing it down.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-05, 03:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
-
2012-09-05, 03:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
-
2012-09-05, 04:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
-
2012-09-05, 04:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
-
2012-09-05, 07:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
No need to apologize to me, I used math! Apologize to math if you're going to apologize to anybody!
Except you totally don't need to apologize at all because the estimates were pretty spot-on.
So yeah, insanely close to what I estimated, especially considering the fact that I rounded a bit.
Anyway, I enjoyed reading your critiques, though I can't say I had the patience to sit through more than half of the ones that weren't for my build... that's a lot of reading, you know?It's been a bit, GitP. If you're reading this, you're either digging through old stuff, or I've posted for the first time in forever.
If you want to stay in touch, reach out to me on twitter (same username).
The best answer is always to ask your DM.
Unless you're the DM, in which case you should talk to your players.
-
2012-09-05, 10:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Where do you get the notion that kensai = fear stacking?
Kensai gets intimidate as a class skill and, IIRC, a couple of small, situational bonuses to cha related skill checks, but that doesn't really seem to me like it demands fear stacking. You could even use signature weapon to pick up a few fear effect causing/boosting enhancements onto him in-class, but I still don't see it as automatic.I am not seaweed. That's a B.
Praise I've received A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign
Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle
-
2012-09-07, 08:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Less than 36 hours until the judging deadline--are any others weighing in, or will this be a one-judge round?
-
2012-09-07, 08:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
looks like a one-judger from where I'm standing. it was hard enough to find someone who wanted to scrutinize one acolyte in the form of building it for a week, but looking at 10? I'm not surprised there aren't more judges. I think gbprime mentioned he was halfway through judgings last week, but I don't believe he's commented since. I can't say I blame him, I'd be a little daunted by judging all the entries this time around as well. if none of the other judges are going to have it finished by saturday, will the chairman call it early?
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-07, 09:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Hmm, judges penalising people for taking poetic license with fluff, snarky comments towards people for guessing at the next SI...kind of glad I've been away for a coupe of weeks.
Last edited by Thurbane; 2012-09-07 at 09:23 AM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2012-09-07, 09:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Maybe it has something to do with the upcoming change of seasons?
People get irratable toward the end of winter and a little anxious toward the beggining of fall.I am not seaweed. That's a B.
Praise I've received A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign
Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle
-
2012-09-07, 09:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-07, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Alright, gentlemen.
After a while trying to quell that combative spirit of mine, I've made a decision, but that decision is strongly influenced by the current state of events.
I am willing to re-evaluate Ash'okk's Originality rating from the ground up, as per the Chairman's wishes. That should solve the problem. I've noticed that a part of the spectators (and the Chairman, mostly) aren't happy with my decision, so it's for the best that I solve that. I can't do it now, but I might take some time at night to solve it. I think I explained my reasons why I made my choice (and expanded upon them), but the silence and the way the Chairman agreed with a subsequent comment have led me to think he's unhappy with the answer.
However, I've seen two comments that I find a bit unsettling. I can't demand an apology. I can't help, though, to see them as anything but snark (particularly one that's outright sarcasm). I'd hope to see that was, just as my "passionate" answer ("passionate" in the sense that it was driven by the emotions at the moment), a "passionate" response, and not anything else.
Is that alright with everybody?Retooler of D&D 3.5 (and 5e/Next) content. See here for more.
Now with a comprehensive guide for 3.5 Paladin players porting to Pathfinder. Also available for 5th Edition
On Lawful Good:
T.G. Oskar profile by Specter.
-
2012-09-07, 11:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Amen. Please, let's try to keep the emotions aside. I know that, whether as contestants or judges, we pour hours of our time into these posts. However, at the end of it all, we're talking about a game. Let's still try to have some fun along the way .
-
2012-09-07, 01:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I think less snark would be greatly appreciated. by everyone
-
2012-09-07, 11:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I don't mind snark so much, at least not until it starts to get hostile.
I am not seaweed. That's a B.
Praise I've received A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign
Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle
-
2012-09-08, 12:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Bellona
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
Seems like most contests recently have all been either one or two judges... It's a shame. I wish I knew a way to encourage more judges. I will say this - barring major life/work interference, I will make it a priority to judge for the next contest I don't enter. I've entered 8 contests and only judged once, so I definitely owe it.
Optimization Showcase in the Playground
Former projects:
Shadowcaster Handbook
Archer Build Compendium
Iron Chef Awards!
Spoiler
GOLD
IC LXXVI: Talos
IC LXXV: Alphonse Louise Constant
IC XLIX: Babalon, Queen of Bones
IC XLV: Dead Mists
IC XL: Lycus Blackbeak
IC XXXIX: AM-1468
IC XXXV: Parsifal the Fool
IC XXX: Jal Filius
-
2012-09-08, 01:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground XXXVI
I'd have loved to judge, but between life and trying to see if I can drum up some trophies (going... alright. Nothing yet that I'd be willing to post, but getting there), I've been far too slammed.
As a consolation prize, I may have some trophies for y'all by the end of (next) week.